Leon FL Lawyers | Miguel Oxamendi -- eLawyers

97-004443 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs KENT N. STRAUSS, D/B/A KENT`S NORTHSIDE LOUNGE AND RESTAURANT (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 23, 1997

Should the Petitioner impose discipline against Respondent, holder of an alcoholic beverage license, for violations of laws pertaining to that license?Licensee allowed his employees to engage in conduct involving narcotics by his negligence and his lack of diligence. This makes him subject to license discipline.

98-004703 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs FLORIDA VENTURES, INC., D/B/A CLUB DIAMONDS (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 1998

Whether the violations alleged in the Administrative Action, as amended, were committed? If so, should Respondent be held responsible for these violations? If so, what penalty should be imposed against Respondent?Licensee was held responsible for lewd dances performed by dancers on licensed premises during three visits made by undercover officers to premises in ten-day period. $1,000.00 fine recommended.

96-003665 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs LAWRENCE C. WHITEHEAD, D/B/A JOLLY SPOT (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 1996

Whether controlled substances were possessed, sold, or used at the Jolly Spot Lounge and, if so, whether the owner's alcoholic beverage license should be revoked or whether he should be otherwise disciplined.Possession of controlled substance warranted revocation of alcoholic beverage license.

98-003701 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs JIMMY K. BOYD, D/B/A GET A WAY BAR AND LOUNGE (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 1998

Whether Respondent's alcoholic beverage license number 60-05660, series 2COP, should be disciplined based on the alleged violations of the alcoholic beverage laws set forth in the Notice to Show Cause dated August 14, 1998.License should be revoked where employees ignored flagrant drug dealings on licensed premises.

97-001472 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs SUAMY CORPORATION, D/B/A BISTROL SUNDRIES (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 1997

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the offense set forth in the Administrative Action and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Licensee subject to discipline where it was shown to possess, on the licensed premises, alcoholic beverages it was not authorized to sell.

96-004934 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs KASH N KARRY FOOD STORES, INC., D/B/A KASH N KARRY NO. 620 (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 1996

The issue for consideration in this matter is whether Respondent’s alcoholic beverage license, Series 3-PS, No. 39- 01099, for the premises located at 13508 Florida Avenue, Tampa, should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Action filed herein.Licensee's orientation and employee training was not sufficient to excuse it from responsibility under Florida liquor law for employee misconduct.

96-001011 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs DW/BABALOOS, INC., D/B/A AFTER MIDNIGHT (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 1996

The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of selling alcoholic beverages not permitted by Respondent's license.Bottle club sold beer and whiskey to patrons, who brought no alcoholic beverages to the club. $1320 fine.

97-004378 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs VAMPIRE CAFE, INC., D/B/A VAMPIRE CAFE (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 16, 1997

Whether the Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Action dated June 30, 1997, and, if so, the penalty which should be imposed.Licensee established defense to sale of alcoholic beverage to a minor, and administrative action should be dismissed.

96-002625 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs FUTANA VILLAGE, INC., D/B/A SPINNAKER (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 1996

Whether Respondent owes additional alcohol consumption tax.Free drinks served to patrons when cover charge paid or under membership in club constitute a sale and are subject to surcharge tax. Reliance on audit procedures used in earlier audit was reasonable.

97-000142 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs ALI EID, D/B/A S AND A FOOD MART (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 10, 1997

The issue is whether Respondent allowed his employee to purchase stolen property while working on the licensed premises and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent knew his employee-nephew was buying stolen property at licensed premises.

Miguel Oxamendi