Leon FL Lawyers | Miguel Oxamendi -- eLawyers

Ago (1975)

Florida Attorney General Reports Filed: Apr. 16, 1975

QUESTION: Can s. 231.39(3), F.S., be interpreted to permit a teacher to utilize accumulated sick-leave credits with pay for pregnancy or pregnancy-related disabilities SUMMARY: In order to avoid conflict with the controlling provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e); ss. 231.39(3) and 231.40, F.S., should be interpreted so as to allow a pregnant school teacher to utilize available sick-leave credit for pregnancy or pregnancy-related disabilities. The provision ..

90-02000 MRG v. State (1991)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 1991 Citations: 576 So. 2d 1378

576 So. 2d 1378 (1991) M.R.G., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90-02000. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 5, 1991. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant M.R.G. seeks review of a circuit court order adjudicating him delinquent and placing him on supervised ..

96-004731 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs BILLY BOY'S OF PINELLAS, INC., D/B/A BIG SHOTS (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 1996

The issue in this case is whether the Petitioner should fine the Respondent up to $1,000 for alleged violation of Section 561.14(3), Fla. Stat. (1995).Respondent bought alcoholic beverages from retailer not licensed to do so. Recommend $1000 fine.

96-005971 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs AHMAD ENTERPRISES CORP., D/B/A NEW HIALEAH SUPERMARKET (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 20, 1996

At the final hearing in this case the Petitioner presented the testimony of three witnesses; two Special Agents of the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco and one Investigative Aide. The Respondent presented the testimony of two witnesses; the owner of the Respondent corporation and her husband. The Respondent also offered one exhibit, which was received in evidence.Unlawful sale of alcoholic beverages and cigarettes to minor warrants seven-day suspension and $1500 Administrative Fine.

97-002261 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs GOLDEN SHOW, INC., D/B/A SOLID GOLD (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 13, 1997

Each of the Petitioners is an applicant for an alcoholic beverage license. The issue in each case is whether the license application of each Petitioner should be granted or denied.Application for alcoholic beverage license should be denied where applicant is alien excluded from USA, applications are incomplete, applicant fails to furnish requested info, and application contains false statement.

97-002844 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs CAFE IGUANA, INC., D/B/A CAFE IGUANA (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 1997

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Emergency Order of Suspension and Notice to Show Cause and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Licensee did not condone illegal drug sales and these drug sales were not so open or notorious to constitute negligent management.

01-000519PL DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs YOSVANI ALFONSO (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2001

$25,000 fine and two years` probation for bail bondsman`s misleading Yellow Pages ads and use of unlicensed employee to return collateral receipt.

99-004363 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs DONNA M. JAQUITH (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1999

Whether Respondent committed the offenses alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Petitioner, a licensed limited surety agent (bail bondsman), published a deceptive and misleading advertisement and should pay an administrative fine of $100.

00-000455 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs RICHARD EDWARD PANAGOS (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 27, 2000

Whether Respondent, a licensed insurance agent, committed the offenses alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Mere possession of controlled substance is not a crime involving moral turpitude. Insurance agent failed to timely report to Department his plea of nolo contendere to felony.

00-000300 LANNIE J. GREGORY vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 19, 2000

The issue in the case is whether the Respondent, an insurance agent, has complied with applicable continuing education requirements.Respondent`s noncompliance with continuing education requirements requires penalty, including temporary suspension of Respondent`s licensure and a $1,000 fine.

Miguel Oxamendi