Broward FL Banking, Bankruptcy and debt and Consumer protect -- eLawyers

07-003513PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE vs FRANCIS J. FALOWSKI, D.C. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 2007

Whether the Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint issued October 2, 2006, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner offered to perform services beyond the scope provided by law by offering to perform acupuncture services when he was not certified to do so, and violated Section 460.413(1)(t), Florida Statutes. Recommend an administrative fine and probation.

07-003514PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE vs FRANCIS J. FALOWSKI, D.C. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 2007

Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint issued September 29, 2006, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner did not disseminate false advertising because the documents at issue were disseminated to another chiropractor and not to the "public." Recommend that both counts of Amended Administrative Complaint be dismissed.

02-004916RX JOHN W. SULLIVAN, D.C., AND FLORIDA CHIROPRACTORS PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 30, 2002

Whether Rule 64B2-17.0025(4), Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Rule prohibiting chiropractors from administering injectable vitamins not invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority; evidence established statutory definitions of "legend drugs" included injectable vitamins, making administration off-limits.

89-003723 BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs FREDERICK J. KUNEN (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 1989

The issue in these cases is whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice medicine, No. ME 0046170, based upon the alleged violations of Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes, set forth in the Administrative Complaint dated April 6, 1989, (the "First Administrative Complaint") which has been assigned DOAH Case No. 89-3723 and/or the Administrative Complaint dated August 16, 1990, (the "Second Administrative Complaint") which has been assigned DOAH Case No. 91-3864.Respondent improperly prescribed thyroid prescription to patient for weight loss; erroneous insurance billings; Respondent also servered as med director for allergy clinic that billed for sham tests.

90-000068 BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs MANUEL LUNA (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 1990

The issues for determination in this proceeding are whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what disciplinary action, if any, should be taken against Respondent's license.Medical Doctor who treated patient with throat cancer for sore throat without diagnosing cancer or referring patient should be fined $5000 + probation for 3 years.

91-003492 BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs MICHAEL J. PONTE (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 06, 1991

Whether Respondent committed the offenses described in the Amended Administrative Complaint? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him?Veterinarian negligent in failing to immobilize bird's broken leg; guilty of bad record keeping; charges of excessive fees and not giving advertised care not proved.

90-005132 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs BENJAMIN C. ROLFE AND DUANE C. HEISER (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 1990

Whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are true and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Parties stipulated as to violations alleged in two counts of five count Administrative Complaint, and as to recommended penalty. No evidence presented as to other counts.

91-000475 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MANUEL N. LUNA (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 1991

The issues for determination in this proceeding are whether Respondent failed to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment of two patients which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar circumstances and whether Respondent failed to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of the two patients.Respondent was negligent by failing to properly interpret EKG, failing to perform diagnostic tests, on two separate patients.

90-005809 BOARD OF PHARMACY vs AHMAD ALLY AND THE MEDICINE SHOPPE (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1990

Whether petitioner should take disciplinary action against respondent for the reasons alleged in the administrative complaint?Dispensing Tussionex without a prescription results in recommendation for suspension of pharmacist's license.

90-004549 BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs BARRY A. GOLDBERG (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 1990

Whether Respondent committed the offenses described in the Administrative Complaints? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him?Vet not guilty of neglect in treating dog, nor misconduct in practice for drug dealing & having certain drugs in office; guilty of bad recordkeeping.

Neil Franklin Garfield