Leon FL Lawyers | Paolo Giuseppe Annino -- eLawyers

15-003735RU A. R., A. S., Y. S., D. S., AND Q. J. vs THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 26, 2015

Whether the Children's Medical Services Network ("CMSN") Clinical Eligibility Screening Guide (Version 12) constitutes an unadopted rule whose existence violates section 120.54(1)(a), because the statement has not been adopted through formal rulemaking procedures.The Department's Clinical Eligibility Screening Guide (Version 12), constitutes an unadopted rule whose existence violates section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes, because the statement has not been adopted through formal rulemaking.

96-005814 LENA SUSANNE DAMRON vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 1996

Whether Petitioner satisfies the statutory definition of "autism," pursuant to Section 323.063(2), Florida Statutes, so as to qualify for developmental services administered by Respondent, Department of Children and Family Services a/k/a Department of Children and Families, f/k/a Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (Department).Diagnosis of autism within standards of the profession of psychiatrist, licensed Florida psychologist or skilled Department psychologist was not proven.

96-004200 KETURA BOUIE | K. B. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 04, 1996

Whether Ketura Bouie suffers from “retardation”, as that term is defined by Section 393.063(43), Florida Statutes, and therefore qualifies for developmental services offered by the Respondent agency under Chapter 393, Florida Statutes.Statutory test met. Guidelines and exhibits not introduced are insufficient to rebut. Non-expert speculation is insufficient to rebut proof of eligibility.

93-004863GM 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA AND ROBERT JENKS vs CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 1993

The issue in these cases is whether Amendment No. 93D2 is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City of Daytona Beach comprehensive plan, the regional policies, state comprehensive plan and pertinent statutes and rules.Affordable housing element of plan amendment found to be in compliance. Request for sanctions denied.

86-002601 SCHOOL BOARD OF FRANKLIN COUNTY vs. STANLEY MCINTYRE (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 13, 1987

Willful repeated refusal to obey a reasonable lawful order of school princible who had authority to so direct and sanction; is gross insubordination and neglect of duty.

86-002430RP MARY WARD, MCARTHUR SMITH, AND NIDIA GARCIA vs. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 15, 1986

Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, K. N. Ayers, held a public hearing in the above styled cause on August 7, 1986, at Tallahassee, Florida. APPEARANCES For Petitioner: Paolo G. Annino, Esquire Legal Services for North Florida 822 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32303Rule requiring appellants appealing denial of unemployment benefits to pay cost of preparing transcript held valid.

85-000740 JACK W. SIMMONS vs. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (1985)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 27, 1985

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Petitioner should be deemed to have abandoned his career service employment position with the Department of Natural Resources and, therefore, whether the Department of Administration should issue a final order to that effect. The parties presented Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law which are dealt with in this Recommended Order and, additionally, are addressed in the Appendix attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.Employee who fails to report to work or all his employer for three consecutive days has abandoned his position.

Paolo Giuseppe Annino