Elawyers Elawyers
Patrick Francis Creehan
Patrick Francis Creehan
Visitors: 116
0
Bar #63540(FL)     License for 30 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Patrick Francis Creehan? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-004291  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES vs JOHN C. MINDER  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2014
Whether Respondent, John C. Minder, committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint issued by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Petitioner) on November 17, 2014; and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove the allegations. Recommend dismissal of the Amended Administrative Complaint.
15-000087PL  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS vs WESLEY BRIAN HAAS  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2015
Whether Respondents failed to abide by various minimal technical standards applicable to the practice of surveying and mapping, in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rules 5J-17.051 and 5J-17.052, or were guilty of negligence in the practice of surveying and mapping, all in violation of section 472.0351, Florida Statutes (2012),1/ and if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Respondents failed to abide by various minimal technical standards applicable to the practice of surveying and mapping, but were not guilty of negligence in the practice of surveying and mapping.
15-000089  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS vs EXACTA LAND SURVEYORS, INC.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2015
Whether Respondents failed to abide by various minimal technical standards applicable to the practice of surveying and mapping, in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rules 5J-17.051 and 5J-17.052, or were guilty of negligence in the practice of surveying and mapping, all in violation of section 472.0351, Florida Statutes (2012),1/ and if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Respondents failed to abide by various minimal technical standards applicable to the practice of surveying and mapping, but were not guilty of negligence in the practice of surveying and mapping.
09-004296PL  FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS vs KAMAL YAZJI, P.E.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 13, 2009
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent violated Section 471.033(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2006), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G15-33.003(2), and if so, what penalties should be imposed?Respondent committed negligence in the practice of engineering in his preparation of plans for a church remodel project.
07-001531F  THE POOL PEOPLE, INC. vs FLORIDA ENGINEERS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 2007
Whether Petitioner is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 57.111, Florida Statutes?Respondent met burden of proving that it was substantially justified in initiating prosecution of an unlicensed practice of engineering charges against a "prevailing small business party." No fees are awarded.
01-003890  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs ROBERT FOOTMAN  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2001
Whether Respondent violated Section 489.127(1)(f), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed against Respondent in this proceeding and should be disciplined.Respondent was shown to have engaged in pool contracting without a license. Respondent presented evidence in mitigation of the fine suggested by the Petitioner.
00-005141PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs DANNY L. REEVES  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 28, 2000
Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice contracting, license number CG C033931, based on the violations of Section 489.129(1), Florida Statutes, as charged in the Administrative Complaint filed against Respondent in this proceeding.Licensed contractor abandoned and mismanaged project causing financial harm to customer; failed to subcontract for portions for which he was not licensed; failed to have local inspections; and failed to advise customer of rights under Recovery Fund.
00-002938PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs RONALD J. POWELL  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2000
Did Respondent commit the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated April 11, 2000, and if so, what discipline is appropriate?There was clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(h)2(k), F.S.
98-003321  DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs CHRISTINE LEE SPRINGER  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 1998
The Department of Insurance (Agency) has charged Respondent with various violations of Chapter 626, Florida Statutes, related to her fitness for continued licensure as an insurance agent. Specifically, the Administrative Complaint dated May 22, 1998, alleges that on July 31, 1997, Respondent pled nolo contendere to presenting a false statement of insurance coverage and grand theft, had adjudication withheld, and was sentenced to probation, restitution, and community service. The Administrative Complaint also alleges that on September 12, 1997, Respondent pled guilty to presenting a false statement of insurance coverage and grand theft and failed to notify the Department of Insurance of her plea. The Administrative Complaint alleges that Respondent thereby lacks qualifications for licensure, has demonstrated a lack of fitness or trustworthiness to engage in the business of insurance and has violated other laws and rules regarding adjudication of guilt or pleas of guilt or nolo contendere. The issues in this proceeding are whether those violations occurred and if so, what discipline is appropriate.Agency proved only that Respondent violated statutes regarding pleas of nolo contendere. Without more than the court records (no witnesses, no testimony), the underlying offenses were not proven.
98-003776  DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs STEPHEN PETER ALICINO  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 1998
This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to take disciplinary action against a licensee on the basis of alleged violations set forth in a one-count Administrative Complaint. It is alleged that the Respondent has violated numerous specified provisions of Chapters 626 and 631, Florida Statutes, by failing to satisfy a judgment entered against him in favor of the Department in its capacity as receiver for an insurance company.Insurance agent`s failure to pay judgment in favor of Department of Insurance (DOI) warrants revocation of license.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer