welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Paul Nathan Rendleman
Paul Nathan Rendleman
Paul Nathan Rendleman
Visitors: 48
0
Bar #84604(FL)     License for 15 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Paul Nathan Rendleman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 1012.795, 120.52, 120.536, 120.555, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 17.001, 17.002, 20.165, 282.709, 287.001, 287.012, 287.057, 287.0571, 287.058, 292.16, 320.71, 455.227, 455.2273, 475.25, 489.1195, 489.129, 489.1425, 95.36

10-009317PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs BRIAN VINCENT BURNS  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2010
In this disciplinary proceeding, the issues are: (1) Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint issued by the Petitioner; and (2) Whether disciplinary penalties should be imposed on Respondent if Petitioner proves one or more of the violations charged in its Administrative Complaint.Respondent violated Chapter 489 by abandoning a construction project when he failed to complete the work under contract and he did not include a written statement explaining the consumer's rights under the Florida Homeowners' Construction Recovery Fund.
11-003007PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HUGH D. RHEA  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaints and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Department proved that Respondent violated section 475.624(2) and (15). All other alleged volations not proven. Recommend revocation.
11-003008PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HUGH D. RHEA  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaints and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Department proved that Respondent violated section 475.624(2) and (15). All other alleged volations not proven. Recommend revocation.
11-003009PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HUGH D. RHEA  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaints and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Department proved that Respondent violated section 475.624(2) and (15). All other alleged volations not proven. Recommend revocation.
08-004836  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs FREDERICK B. NOWELL, SR., D/B/A WELLING CONSTRUCTION, INC./REDLAND COMPANY, INC.  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2008
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent has committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Sections 489.129(1)(b) and 455.227(1)(c), Florida Statutes, when he pled guilty to mail fraud in federal district court. Recommend revocation, a $15,000 fine and costs.
14-002205RX  DONNA A. BURNEY vs STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether the Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction to determine whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-4.009 is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority in violation of section 120.52(8)(d), Florida Statutes (2013).DOAH does not have jurisdction to consider challenge to rule 6B-4.009 because it is no longer in existence.
12-001264PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs SARAH ELIZABETH HENDRICK  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 11, 2012
Whether Respondent violated sections 475.42(1) (b) and (e), and 455.227(1) (j), Florida Statutes (2011), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.1/Respndent violated statutes by acting as a real estate sales associate for an entity that was not registered as her employer, and for assisting an unlicensed entity in selling real estate.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer