Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Paul Sexton
Paul Sexton
Visitors: 97
0
Bar #243582(FL)     License for 48 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Paul Sexton? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

61101  Citizens of State v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N  (1982)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 1982 Citations: 425 So. 2d 534
425 So. 2d 534 (1982) CITIZENS OF the STATE of Florida, Appellants, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and Florida Power Corporation, Appellees. No. 61101. Supreme Court of Florida. December 16, 1982. *535 Jack Shreve, Public Counsel and J. Roger Howe, Associate Public Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellants. William S. Bilenky, Gen. Counsel and Paul Sexton, Staff Counsel, Florida Public Service Com'n, Tallahassee, and Sylvia H. Walbolt and Robert W. Pass of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler..
55147  Austin Tupler Trucking, Inc. v. Hawkins  (1979)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 21, 1979 Citations: 377 So. 2d 679
377 So. 2d 679 (1979) AUSTIN TUPLER TRUCKING, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Paula F. HAWKINS et al., Respondents. No. 55147. Supreme Court of Florida. November 21, 1979. *680 Richard B. Austin of the Law Offices of Richard B. Austin, Miami, for petitioners. Prentice P. Pruitt and Paul Sexton, Tallahassee, for respondents. John P. Bond of Bond, Woitesek & Davis, Miami, for Benny's Transport, Inc. and Charles Eubanks, interveners-respondents. SUNDBERG, Justice. By certiorari to the Florida Public S..
53363  Kimball v. Hawkins  (1978)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 02, 1978 Citations: 364 So. 2d 463
364 So. 2d 463 (1978) James T. KIMBALL, d/b/a American Transportation, Petitioner, v. Paula F. HAWKINS, William T. Mayo, and Robert T. Mann, As and Constituting the Florida Public Service Commission, Respondents. No. 53363. Supreme Court of Florida. November 2, 1978. *464 J.B. Curasi, Tallahassee, for petitioner. Prentice P. Pruitt, Legal Director, M. Robert Christ and Paul Sexton, Staff Counsels, Tallahassee, for respondents. Gregory A. Presnell of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, Orlando, for inte..
14-004724RX  CHILDREN'S HOUR DAY SCHOOL vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 2014
The issue in this case is whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 65C-22.010(2)(e)2.a. constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Rule 65C-22.010(2)(e)2.a. enlarges, modifies, or contravenes the specific provisions of law implemented insofar as it denies licensees an offer of a point of entry into the administrative process.
09-001524  MALIBU LODGING INVESTMENTS, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 2009
Whether the mural on the east exterior wall of the City Inn Hotel is an illegal sign subject to removal pursuant to Section 479.105, Florida Statutes.The display of an unpermitted mural on hotel advertising beer product not "sold, produced, manufactured, or furnished" on premises of hotel, for which hotel owner received rental income, was illegal, and the mural was subject to removal.
06-000365  CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 27, 2006
Should Petitioner, Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (Clear Channel) be permitted to remove, cut, or trim trees located in the view zone related to outdoor advertising signs, FDOT Permit Tag Nos. BL-017 and BL-018, issued by Department of Transportation (DOT) to Clear Channel, for a location at the intersection of Northeast Eighth Avenue and State Road 24 (Waldo Road), in Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida?Respondent should grant a vegetation management permit.
06-002233  CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR-ATLANTIC COAST DIVISION vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 22, 2006
Whether the 14 applications (application numbers 54481 through 54494) for the eight sign structures (six double-sided and two single-sided) adjacent to Interstate Route 95 and the Florida Turnpike within the City of Port St. Lucie should be granted or denied by Respondent.Fourteen applications for signs comply with the requirements of Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code. The signs are to be written industrial or commercial. Zoning is not enacted primarily to permit signs. Recommend that the permits be granted.
06-000153  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS vs SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2006
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be imposed.As an "energy performance contractor," as defined in former Section 235.213, Florida Statutes, Respondent was exempt from the certification requirement of Section 471.023, Florida Statutes.
01-003373  BROWARD COUNTY vs ARTHUR WEISS, TRUSTEE, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 2001
The ultimate issue in this case is whether the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) should grant Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Application No. 970509-10 for conceptual approval of a surface water management system serving a 167.9-acre commercial development in Broward County known as Pembroke Center and issue ERP No. 0600095-S-15 (Permit) to Arthur D. Weiss, Trustee (Weiss). The primary contested sub-issues involve the extent of use of offsite mitigation of the project's wetlands impacts through purchase of credits purchased from Florida Power and Light Company (FPL's) Everglades Mitigation Bank (EMB) 40 miles away in southern Dade County.Applicant for surface water management ERP proposed more than 75% of mitigation required to offset impacts to wetland functions out-of-basin through purchase of credits at mitigation bank 40 miles away--too far to avoid unacceptable cumulative impacts.
01-002704BID  PCL CENTREX ROONEY vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 10, 2001
Whether the Respondents' decision to rank the Intervenor, Turner Construction Company (Turner) first for purposes of entering into contract negotiations was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition as alleged by the Petitioner, PCL/Centex Rooney, a joint venture comprised of PCL Civil Contractors, Inc. and Centex Rooney Construction Company, Inc. (PCL/Centex or Petitioner).Protest cannot challenge provisions of a Request for Statement of Qualifications not timely attached as an issue with the specifications.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer