welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Randall Odo Reder
Randall Odo Reder
Randall Odo Reder
Visitors: 39
0
Bar #264210(FL)     License for 46 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Randall Odo Reder? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-003204  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs SUSIE RIOPELLE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 05, 2003
At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent failed to abide by the coverage requirements of the Workers' Compensation Law, Chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2002), by not obtaining workers' compensation insurance for her employees; and whether Petitioner properly assessed a penalty against Respondent pursuant to Section 440.107, Florida Statutes (2002).Respondent failed to obtain workers` compensation for her employees. Recommended confirming and adopting the Corrected Stop Work and Penalty Assessment Order dated August 2003.
03-001757  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs SUSIE RIOPELLE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 16, 2003
At issue in this proceeding is whether the Respondent failed to abide by the coverage requirements of the Workers' Compensation Law, Chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2002), by not obtaining workers' compensation insurance for her employees; and whether the Petitioner properly assessed a penalty against the Respondent pursuant to Section 440.107, Florida Statutes (2002).Department established that workers on home construction job site were "employees," not "independent contractors."
98-004062BID  SANTA FE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1998
Whether the Respondent's decision to reject the Petitioner's bid proposal for Contract No. E4A83, Financial Project No. 231494-1-52-01, State Project No. 99904-3404, is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Lowest bidder proved by preponderance of evidence that Department of Transportation`s (DOT) decision to award contract to second lowest bidder was arbitrary and capricious. Bid protest should be sustained and contract awarded to lowest bidder.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer