Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Randi Ellen Dincher
Randi Ellen Dincher
Visitors: 68
0
Bar #18580(FL)     License for 19 years; Member in Good Standing
Gainesville FL

Are you Randi Ellen Dincher? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
19-001880  BAYFRONT HMA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
These consolidated cases involve three issues: (1) whether the Department of Revenue's ("the Department") assessment against Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC ("Bayfront"), for sales tax on commercial rent payments is erroneous; (2) whether Bayfront is entitled to a refund for overpayment of sales tax on commercial rent payments from August 1, 2014, to July 31, 2017; and (3) whether Bayfront is entitled to a refund for overpayment of sales tax on commercial rent payments from August 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018.Bayfront Baby Place is not exempt from tax as a lease for re-lease or a space used exclusively as a dwelling unit. Recommend sustaining assessment and denying refund applications.
19-001881  BAYFRONT HMA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
These consolidated cases involve three issues: (1) whether the Department of Revenue's ("the Department") assessment against Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC ("Bayfront"), for sales tax on commercial rent payments is erroneous; (2) whether Bayfront is entitled to a refund for overpayment of sales tax on commercial rent payments from August 1, 2014, to July 31, 2017; and (3) whether Bayfront is entitled to a refund for overpayment of sales tax on commercial rent payments from August 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018.Bayfront Baby Place is not exempt from tax as a lease for re-lease or a space used exclusively as a dwelling unit. Recommend sustaining assessment and denying refund applications.
19-001882  BAYFRONT HMA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
These consolidated cases involve three issues: (1) whether the Department of Revenue's ("the Department") assessment against Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC ("Bayfront"), for sales tax on commercial rent payments is erroneous; (2) whether Bayfront is entitled to a refund for overpayment of sales tax on commercial rent payments from August 1, 2014, to July 31, 2017; and (3) whether Bayfront is entitled to a refund for overpayment of sales tax on commercial rent payments from August 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018.Bayfront Baby Place is not exempt from tax as a lease for re-lease or a space used exclusively as a dwelling unit. Recommend sustaining assessment and denying refund applications.
18-002772  GBR ENTERPRISES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2018
Whether Respondent, Department of Revenue's ("Department"), B03 assessment against Petitioner, GBR Enterprises, Inc. ("GBR"), for sales tax and interest is incorrect.Vending machine company's arrangement with schools is in the nature of a service contract and not a license fee for use of real property, and therefore, DOR's proposed assessment is incorrect.
18-004475RX  GBR ENTERPRISES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 23, 2018
As to DOAH Case No. 18-4475RX, whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 12A-1.044(5)(a) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority in violation of section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes.1/ As to DOAH Case No. 18-4992RU, whether the Department of Revenue's ("Department") Standard Audit Plan, Vending and Amusement Machines--Industry Specific, section 1.1.3.3 ("SAP") is an unadopted rule in violation of sections 120.54 and 120.56, Florida Statutes.DOR exceeded its grant of rulemaking authority as to existing rule and the rule enlarges, modifies, or contravenes law implemented. However, agency statement is not a rule.
18-004992RU  GBR ENTERPRISES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
As to DOAH Case No. 18-4475RX, whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 12A-1.044(5)(a) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority in violation of section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes.1/ As to DOAH Case No. 18-4992RU, whether the Department of Revenue's ("Department") Standard Audit Plan, Vending and Amusement Machines--Industry Specific, section 1.1.3.3 ("SAP") is an unadopted rule in violation of sections 120.54 and 120.56, Florida Statutes.DOR exceeded its grant of rulemaking authority as to existing rule and the rule enlarges, modifies, or contravenes law implemented. However, agency statement is not a rule.
17-006516  CELLULAR PLUS AND ACCESSORIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 05, 2017
Whether the Department of Revenue's ("Department") assessment for sales and use tax, penalty, and interest is valid, correct, and should be upheld.Based on the facts presented and the admissions conclusively established during discovery by order of the administrative law judge, the sales tax, interest, and penalties imposed by the agency are affirmed and upheld.
20-005390  B CENTURY 21, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 14, 2020
Whether Respondent Department of Revenue’s (Department) January 27, 2020, Notice of Proposed Assessment to Petitioner B Century 21, Inc. (B Century 21) is incorrect.Petitioner failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent's January 27, 2020, Notice of Proposed Assessment was incorrect.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer