Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Riley Michelle Landy
Riley Michelle Landy
Visitors: 52
0
Bar #84411(FL)     License for 15 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Riley Michelle Landy? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
18-004664  SHANACE ISAAC vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner was overpaid in the amount of $809.46; and, if so, whether she should be required to repay that amount to Respondent.Petitioner did not meet her burden and is required to repay salary overpayment in the amount of $809.46.
17-006468  KARSEN SPRADLIN vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 29, 2017
The issue is whether the Florida Department of Education (“the Department”) committed one or more unlawful employment practices against Petitioner (“Ms. Spradlin”) by discriminating against her based on race.Petitioner failed to present persuasive evidence to support her claims of unlawful employment practices.
18-001302  KID'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE CHARTER SCHOOL ORANGE COUNTY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
The issues are whether the Department of Education’s (Department) decision to deny Petitioner’s application for capital outlay funding for the 2017-2018 school year is in conflict with Florida Administrative Code Rule 6A-2.0020(4)(b), as amended effective August 13, 2017, and is, therefore, based on an unadopted rule; and whether the Department’s decision to deny the application should be determined under the prior version of the rule.Petitioner failed to prove that Department used an unadopted rule in denying its application for capital outlay funding.
17-003898SP  PAM STEWART, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs SILVA OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A NEW HORIZONS (7502), AND YUDIT SILVA  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2017
The issues in this case are whether Respondents, as the owner and operator of a charter school or a private school, or both, engaged in fraudulent activity or otherwise ran the school(s) in a manner contrary to the health, safety, or welfare of students or the public; and, if so, whether Petitioner should revoke Respondents' participation in several scholarship programs that provide financial assistance to eligible students who choose to attend private schools.Because Respondents committed fraud while operating their private school, Petitioner may revoke Respondents' participation in several scholarship programs that provide financial assistance to students of private schools.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer