Palm Beach FL Lawyers | Roberta Lynn Fenner -- eLawyers

91-004860 BOARD OF PILOT COMMISSIONERS vs HENRY A. STEELE (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 02, 1991

Whether Respondent, while acting as pilot aboard the M/V Itanage in the St. John's River, Jacksonville, Florida on August 29, 1990, engaged in a practice which did not met acceptable standards of safe piloting. (F.S.A. s. 310.101(1)(k))Failure to meet acceptable standards; too much speed for conditions of limited searoom.

91-004825 BOARD OF NURSING vs PAIGE CHRISTOPHER (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 1991

The issue in this case is whether the nursing license of Respondent, Paige Christopher, should be revoked or otherwise penalized based on the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint.Resp not glty of inaccurate record keeping but did fail to meet min. stand in care of elderly diabetic; failed to monitor blood sugar.

91-003492 BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs MICHAEL J. PONTE (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 06, 1991

Whether Respondent committed the offenses described in the Amended Administrative Complaint? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him?Veterinarian negligent in failing to immobilize bird's broken leg; guilty of bad record keeping; charges of excessive fees and not giving advertised care not proved.

92-002399 BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs MYRLIFLORE DEJEAN, D/B/A MYRLI'S HAIR AND NAIL DESIGN (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 20, 1992

Whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Fine recommended where beauty salon was operated without licensure and in violation of sanitation standards.

91-005042 BOARD OF NURSING vs GAIL ANN SCHAEFER (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 1991

The issue to be decided is whether the Respondent's license as a practical nurse in the State of Florida should be revoked, suspended or otherwise disciplined.Evidence that Respondent altered prescription did rise to level of clear and convincing.

92-000026 BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs KETTLY GUILBAUD, D/B/A WONDERFUL HAIR WEAVING NO. 2 (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 03, 1992

The issue is whether Ms. Guilbaud is subject to discipline for operating a beauty salon with persons who were unlicensed, and for failure to meet standards established by rule for sanitation at the salon.Discipline for failure to hire licensed persons and for failure to comply with sanitation rules or to post those rules in the shop.

91-000320 BOARD OF NURSING vs BETTE J. WILTJER WEATHERFORD (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 1991

The issue is whether Ms. Weatherford's license to practice nursing as a registered nurse should be disciplined for abandoning her shift before a relief nurse was found to assume care for her patients.Nurse disciplined for abandoning shift at mental hospital after criticized by director of nursing for poor relations with doctors and other staff

91-004824 BOARD OF NURSING vs OLEAN S. MCCALL JOHNSON (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 1991

The issues here are those established through an administrative complaint, DPR Case No. 0098360, charging the Respondent with violations under the Nurse Practices Act, Chapter 464, Florida Statutes.Charge of abandoning patients in hospital setting. Not proven.

91-000650 APRIL VANORMAN-DOMINICK vs MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELORS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 1991

Whether Petitioner's challenge to the grade she received on the April, 1990, Mental Health Counseling Examination should be sustained?Challenge to 3 questions on mental health counseling exam meritorious; challenge to other questions without merit.

91-001775 BOARD OF NURSING vs DELORES GROCHOWSKI (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 1991

The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Second Amended Administrative Complaint filed against her, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken, if any.No finding of guilt for unprofessional conduct where no evidence of standard to be met and no competent evidence that chart entries were in error.

Roberta Lynn Fenner