Leon FL Lawyers | Ross A McVoy -- eLawyers

82-003029 1010 SEAWAY DRIVE, INC. vs. ROBERT R. PHIFER, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, AND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (1982)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 01, 1991

The ultimate issue in this proceeding is whether the Department should issue a permit to the Applicant. In its request for hearing, Petitioner asserted that the proposed dock extension would constitute a navigational hazard and would cause certain adverse environmental consequences. At the hearing, Petitioner withdrew its contentions as to adverse environmental consequences. The only issues raised during the course of the hearing relate to whether the proposed dock extension will result in navigational hazards to adjoining property owners.Petitioner should be granted permit to enlarge existing dock because the dock is not an unreasonable impediment to navigation and does not threaten the environment.

85-002904 MANASOTA-88, INC. vs. WILBUR BOYD CORP., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1985)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 04, 1986

Developer made reasonable assurances of compliance. Dredge and fill won't harm water quality and may actually improve the area. Department of Environmental Regulation should grant permit.

86-001078 SARASOTA-MANATEE AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL vs. MANATEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 15, 1986

Application for Development Approval and special permit granted. Terminal project consistent with state/local comprehensive plans.

84-003997 ROBERT W. DODT vs. DNR & NANNETTE K. SCOGGINS (1984)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 11, 1985

Whether the Department of Natural Resources (DNR or Department) should issue a permit to Nannette K. Scoggins to construct seaward of the coastal construction control line.Third-party petition to deny permit for construction seaward of coastal control line should be dismissed for a lack of factual claims alleged.

82-003242 REDDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT vs. CENTRAL FLORIDA UTILITIES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1982)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 30, 1985

The ultimate issue to be resolved at this stage of the proceedings is whether the petition for hearing submitted by RCID was filed in a timely manner. RCID contends that it was entitled to receive actual notice of the application proceeding and to be afforded a point of entry into a formal administrative proceeding. RCID asserts that its petition for formal hearing was filed within the specified period following actual receipt of notice. CFU and the Department contend that actual notice was not required. To the extent that RCID was entitled to actual notice, they contend that it was provided. CFU and the Department assert that the petition for hearing was not filed within the specified time period following receipt of constructive or actual notice.Application for construction permit for wastewater treatment facility denied. Later reversed by Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) and permit granted.

79-000871 MELVIN J. LANEY vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1979)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 28, 1981

Dredge/fill permit should issue subject to conditions.

79-001923 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT vs. FLORIDA CITIES WATER COMPANY, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1979)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 20, 1980

Whether Application #01109-L and Application #01109-J for a public water supply system to serve approximately 17,500 acres of land in Lee County, Florida, should be granted and a permit issued by the South Florida Water Management District.Water use permit should be granted the applicant over objections.

76-000962 PATRICIA GALYON vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1976)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 15, 1977

Validity of Petitioner's reduction in pay pursuant to Chapter 22A-2, Florida Administrative Code. These are appeals of 12 career service employees of the Department of Environmental Regulation to the Career Service Commission, pursuant to Section 110.061, Florida Statutes and Rule 22A-10.05, Florida Administrative Code.Petitioner's claim for reinstatement of old salaries lost in job move from one area to another in the state should be denied.

75-001107 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND vs. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI (1975)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 13, 1977

Petitioner is not entitled to dredge/fill permit to destroy mangrove forests in an aquatic preserve.

76-001725 KAPLAN INDUSTRIES, INC. vs. PROPERTY APPRAISER, POLK COUNTY & DER (1976)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 25, 1977

Grant Petitioner's request for tax reduction for installing metal roofs over the feed sheds where it keeps its cattle because the roofs reduce pollution.

Ross A McVoy