Leon FL Lawyers | Scott C Wright -- eLawyers

02-002966BID CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2002

Are the intended contract awards by the Department of Juvenile Justice (Department) to Intervenor, Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. (Ramsay) under Request for Proposal (RFP) Numbers J5G01 and J5G02 contrary to the Department's governing statutes, applicable rules or policies, or the specifications of the RFPs?Petitioner failed to show that intended contract awards to Ramsay were arbitrary or capricious, contrary to competition, or clearly erroneous, or that contract awards were contrary to Department`s governing statutes or applicable rules.

02-002967BID CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2002

Are the intended contract awards by the Department of Juvenile Justice (Department) to Intervenor, Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. (Ramsay) under Request for Proposal (RFP) Numbers J5G01 and J5G02 contrary to the Department's governing statutes, applicable rules or policies, or the specifications of the RFPs?Petitioner failed to show that intended contract awards to Ramsay were arbitrary or capricious, contrary to competition, or clearly erroneous, or that contract awards were contrary to Department`s governing statutes or applicable rules.

00-001366BID SOUTH FLORIDA JAIL MINISTRIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 2000

Whether Petitioner's protest, challenging Respondent's "identif[ication of] Associated Marine Institute[s], Inc. for potential award(s) [of] the contract" advertised in RFP No. K9018, should be sustained in whole or in part?The selection of a proposer for potential award of a contract was premature where cost proposals had not yet been evaluated.

99-002620BID NON-SECURE DETENTION SERVICES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1999

Whether Respondent's proposed decision to award a contract to The Next Step Adolescent and Youth Community Center, Inc., pursuant to RFP No. K8025 is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, rules, or policies or the proposal specifications.Agency followed its own statutes, rules, and request for proposals when awarding contract for 16-bed non-secure detention program. There was no conflict of interest with Agency employee having interest in facility leased by proposed contract awardee.

99-001106BID VANGARD COMMERCIAL REALTY, INC., vs ROBERT C. AND SARA E. COOK AND DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 1999

The issue in this case is whether the agency's proposed award of a lease for commercial office space to Respondents, Robert C. and Sara E. Cook (the "Cooks"), is contrary to the agency's governing statutes, the agency's rules or policies, or the bid proposal specifications pursuant to Section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1997). (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated).Proposal for lease with power of attorney not signed by both property owners is a material defect, renders proposal non-responsive, and justifies award of second rated proposal. Note: Agency FO issue date and file date with DOAH are correct.

98-004063BID WHARTON INVESTMENT GROUP, LTD. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1998

The issue in this case is whether Respondent’s intended award of a lease for office space to a bidder other than Petitioner was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Absent finding that bids are responsive, Department should reject all such responses.

97-004370BID 241 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 1997

Is the Department of Juvenile Justice's (DJJ's) intended award of the lease-purchase contract pursuant to RFP-P6P02 to The Haskell Company (Haskell) instead of to 241 Development Corporation (241 or 241 Development) contrary to the Agency's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the proposal specifications? See Section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes, (Supp. 1996).BID responsiveness issues discussed as raised against Petitioner on "standing," as against Intervenor on protest, and as de novo.

98-001641BID ROBERT COOK, SARA COOK, AND ALAN TAYLOR vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 1998

Whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Respondent) decision to reject all bids is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest or fraudulent and should be rejected.Petitioner failed to prove that agency`s rejection of all bids was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest or fraudulent; agency`s articulated reasons sufficient even though supervisor dishonest in her response.

97-001966BID THE VILLAGE SOUTH, INC., D/B/A THE VILLAGE vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 1997

The issue in this case is whether Respondent’s award of a contract in response to a Request For Proposal (RFP) was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to read entire Request For Proposal (RFP) did not disqualify an experienced and knowledgeable evaluator or agency's choice of BID award.

97-001443BID HAYNES SERVICE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 1997

Whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ or Department) acted illegally, arbitrarily, dishonestly or fraudulently in the rejection of all proposals for the Better Outlook Center request for proposals.Agency action was supported by logic. Therefore, it is not arbitrary to reject all proposals.

Scott C Wright