Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Scott Simpson
Scott Simpson
Visitors: 28
0
Bar #936080(FL)     License for 32 years; Member in Good Standing
Ormond Beach FL

Are you Scott Simpson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52120.56120.569120.57553.72553.73553.88553.898

11-003319  FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF JEANNETTE SHAW-PEREZ vs CITY OF HOLLY HILL  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 01, 2011
Whether Petitioner was the subject of unlawful coercion, intimidation, threats, or interference in the exercise of her rights in connection with Respondent?s regulatory actions regarding rental property owned by Petitioner, in violation of section 818 of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the Fair Housing Act of 1988 and the Florida Fair Housing Act, chapter 760, Part II, Florida Statutes (2011).Petitioner failed to demonstrate that Respondent committed a violation of the Fair Housing Act by coercing, intimidating, threatening, or interfering with Petitioner in the exercise of her rights granted in the Act.
03-000131BC  FLORIDA HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; VOLUSIA HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; AND STAN SHIRAH vs CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA, AND CITY OF PORT ORANGE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 2003
The issue is whether the local technical amendments to the Florida Building Code adopted by the City of Port Orange and the City of South Daytona comply with the requirements of Section 553.73(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2001).The local technical amendments to the Florida Building Code adopted by Respondents failed to comply with the requirements of Section 553.73(4)(b), Florida Statutes.
92-000942  CITY OF HOLLY HILL vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 1992
Whether the application for an at grade vehicle railroad crossing permit should be issued to the City of Holly Hill by the Department of Transportation.City did not prove necessity, convenience, and safety of the proposed railroad crossing.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer