welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Sean Michael Ellsworth
Sean Michael Ellsworth
Sean Michael Ellsworth
Visitors: 93
0
Bar #39845(FL)     License for 31 years
Miami Beach FL

Are you Sean Michael Ellsworth? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 21 CFR 1 301.75, 21 CFR 1301.75

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.54, 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 194.171, 20.165, 20.197, 20.43, 381.0261, 390.011, 390.014, 393.067, 395.003, 408.813, 409.901, 409.902, 409.907, 409.913, 409.920, 415.101, 415.102, 429.01, 429.02, 429.04, 429.07, 429.14, 429.19, 429.23, 429.28, 440.13, 456.004, 456.013, 456.057, 456.061, 456.0635, 456.072, 456.073, 456.079, 456.50, 458.301, 458.305, 458.309, 458.319, 458.320, 458.327, 458.331, 458.351, 459.005, 460.413, 465.003, 465.014, 465.016, 465.023, 465.025, 465.0276, 466.024, 466.028, 499.003, 499.005, 499.006, 499.007, 57.105, 57.111, 627.4085, 627.736, 627.8405, 766.102, 810.02, 812.014, 817.234, 893.02, 893.03, 893.04, 893.07, 90.301, 90.801, 90.802, 90.803, 90.804, 95.011

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.217, 64B8-8.001, 64B8-8.0011, 64B8-9.003, 64B8-9.009, 64B8-9.0091, 64B8-9.0092

04-002708PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs KURT DANGL, M.D.  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 04, 2004
Whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m), (q), and (t), Florida Statutes (2003), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent ordered excessive amounts of anesthesia, failed to timely order chest compressions, and failed to maintain adequate medical records.
02-002978PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY vs GWYNETH M. GORDON, R.PH.  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2002
The issues are whether Respondents committed the acts or omissions alleged in four administrative complaints, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed against Respondents' licenses.Internet pharmacy that dispensed excessive quantities of obesity drugs should pay fine of $24,000 and be placed on probation for one year.
02-002980PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY vs GWYNETH GORDON, R.PH.  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 29, 2002
The issues are whether Respondents committed the acts or omissions alleged in four administrative complaints, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed against Respondents' licenses.Internet pharmacy that dispensed excessive quantities of obesity drugs should pay fine of $24,000 and be placed on probation for one year.
02-002976  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY vs RX NETWORK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2002
The issues are whether Respondents committed the acts or omissions alleged in four administrative complaints, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed against Respondents' licenses.Internet pharmacy that dispensed excessive quantities of obesity drugs should pay fine of $24,000 and be placed on probation for one year.
02-002977  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY vs RX NETWORK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2002
The issues are whether Respondents committed the acts or omissions alleged in four administrative complaints, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed against Respondents' licenses.Internet pharmacy that dispensed excessive quantities of obesity drugs should pay fine of $24,000 and be placed on probation for one year.
99-001663  CARLOS WARTER, M.D. vs BOARD OF MEDICINE  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 1999
The issue in this case is whether the Petitioner filed an application or request for reactivation of his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida pursuant to Section 458.313(8), Florida Statutes.Petitioner/Applicant failed to demonstrate that he had filed a timely application to reactivate a void license.
02-000017MPI  IV CONCEPTS, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 02, 2002
Whether the Petitioner should be required to reimburse the Respondent for Medicaid overpayments as set forth in the Final Agency Audit Report dated October 29, 2001.AHCA proved Petitioner rec`d Medicaid overpayments during audit period of $2,815,847.32. Petitioner not credited for drugs for which it provided no documentation, purchased from unlicensed wholesalers, and that were transferred/billed to another pharmacy.
02-003207PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MANUEL IRIBAR, M.D.  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2002
Whether Respondent committed the offense set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Doctor`s deviation from standard of care warrants six-month suspension.
00-004747PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LELAND M. HELLER, M.D.  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 2000
The issues in this case relate to whether Respondent is guilty of charges that Petitioner has brought against him under Sections 458.331(1)(t), (q), and (m), Florida Statutes, based on allegations that in treating a young patient, Respondent failed to practice medicine with the requisite level of care; inappropriately prescribed excessive quantities of medications; and failed to keep medical records that justified his treatment decisions.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent physician failed to practice medicine with requisite level of care, inappropriately prescribed excessive quantities of medications, and failed to keep medical records that justified treatment decisions.
00-004413PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROBERT A. ROSS, M.D.  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 2000
The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint filed against him, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him, if any.Respondent performed within the standard of care when he encountered a serious vascular injury during a laparoscopic procedure; administrative complaint dismissed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer