Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Sean William Gellis
Sean William Gellis
Visitors: 60
0
Bar #105924(FL)     License for 12 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Sean William Gellis? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-005502BID  ARNAMY, INC. vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 2019
The issue to determine in this bid protest matter is whether the Department’s intended award of state term contracts for information technology staff augmentation services was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.Pets failed to show Dept's intended award of state term contract was contrary to governing stats, solicitation specs, erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, with exception of scoring criteria for 1 proposal for which info overlooked.
19-005504BID  SEVA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 2019
The issue to determine in this bid protest matter is whether the Department’s intended award of state term contracts for information technology staff augmentation services was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.Pets failed to show Dept's intended award of state term contract was contrary to governing stats, solicitation specs, erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, with exception of scoring criteria for 1 proposal for which info overlooked.
18-000613BID  GEO REENTRY SERVICES, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Whether Respondent, Department of Corrections' ("Department") intended decision to award contracts to Intervenors, Gateway Foundation, Inc. ("Gateway"), and The Unlimited Path, Inc. ("UPI"), for licensed in-prison substance abuse treatment services pursuant to Invitation to Negotiate FDC ITN 17-112 ("the ITN"), is contrary to the Department's governing statutes, rules, or the ITN specifications, and contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.DOC's decision to award contracts to intervenors for in-prison substance abuse treatment pursuant to ITN is not contrary to statutes, rules, ITN specifications, contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.
16-005237BID  BRIDGES OF AMERICA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 13, 2016
The issue to be determined is whether the specifications for Request for Proposals number FDC RFP-17-108, “Community Release Center (CRC) in Orange County, Florida,” are contrary to the governing statutes, rules or policies of the Florida Department of Corrections (the Department or DOC).Petitioner did not demonstrate that the proposed RFP specifications were clearly erroneous contrary to competitive, or arbitrary and capricious.
21-001728BID  AMERICAN LIGHTING AND SIGNALIZATION, LLC vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 2021
Whether Respondent's, Florida Department of Transportation ("the Department"), decision to award a contract to Intervenor, DBi Services, Inc. ("DBi" or "Intervenor"), pursuant to the Bid Solicitation Notice and the Specifications Package (jointly referred to as "Solicitation") for Contract No. E5X18 (highway lighting maintenance in District Five), was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or policies, or the solicitation specifications; and, if so, whether the award was contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.ALS failed to establish that the Department acted contrary to its governing statutes, rules or policies, or the solicitation. Recommend award to Intervenor.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer