MD Lawyers | Thomas C Mielke -- eLawyers

09-004258 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs RAM'S ROTI PALACE (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 2009

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed the violations of the Food Code and Section 509.049, Florida Statutes, alleged in the Administrative Complaint; Recommend a $3,100.

09-005333 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs TD'S SPORTS BAR AND GRILL (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 30, 2009

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated April 17, 2009, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent had numerous violations of the Food Code; Petitioner proved several and a fine was assessed.

08-004981 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs FOOD FOR YOUR MOOD (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2008

The issue for determination is whether Respondent committed the offense set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what action should be taken.Petitioner demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed a critical violation of the Food Code, regarding controlling pests. Recommendation of $1,000 administrative fine.

08-005414 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs PITTSBURGH PETE`S (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 28, 2008

The issues in the case are whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent had no certified food manager and no documentation that food service employees met training requirements.

07-001407 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CHEF LOU`S CATERING, INC. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 2007

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated December 14, 2006, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.The inspection revealed nine critical violations. Recommend a $4,000 fine.

07-004065 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs FLAMERS (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 10, 2007

The issue in this case is whether the Respondent, Flamers, committed the violation alleged and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Unlabeled food containers that were stored overnight violate Food Code.

07-000200 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs HOUSE OF INDIA (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2007

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent is in violation of the Food Code as a result of its failure to eliminate rodent harborage conditions. Recommend a $1,000 fine.

07-001697 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs ADELITA`S CAFE (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2007

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved that Respondent had operated in violation of Chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulated thereunder, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint.

07-000197 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs FAROOQ UMAR AND SUBWAY 15534 (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2007

The issues are whether Respondents violated provisions of law governing the operation of restaurants and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved one noncritical and three critical violations at a Subway restaurant. Recommend a fine of $900.

07-000494 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CASPIAN CAFE (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 29, 2007

The issues are whether Respondent violated certain provisions of Section 509.032, Florida Statutes (2006), and the rules promulgated thereto, and if so, what discipline should be imposed.Clear and convincing evidence shows that Respondent violated several provisions of the Food Code, one provision of NFPA, and other provisions of the Florida Administrative Code and the Florida Statutes.

Thomas C Mielke