Pinellas FL Commercial real estate, Mediation and Real estat -- eLawyers

14-000940GM KATIE PIEROLA AND GREG GERALDSON vs MANATEE COUNTY (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2014

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the amendments to the Manatee County Comprehensive Plan (Manatee Plan) adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Manatee County via Ordinance No. 13-10 on December 5, 2013, are “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2013).Petitioners proved that the proposed comprehensive plan amendments which increased residential density in the Coastal Evacuation area and Coastal High Hazard area were "not in compliance."

11-000009GM KATIE PIEROLA AND GREG GERALDSON vs MANATEE COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2011

The issue is whether the plan amendment adopted by Manatee County (County) by Ordinance No. 10-02 on October 12, 2010, is in compliance.Map change not to increase density in compliance because property located within CCHA and CEA and property would be subject to coastal flooding.

12-003219 FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION vs CRP/HLV HIGHLANDS RANCH, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 2012

Whether the Florida Department of Environmental Protection‘s (Department) notice of intent to issue an environmental resource/mitigation bank permit, and notice of intent to grant a variance waiving the financial responsibility requirements for the construction and implementation activities of the mitigation bank to Respondent, CRP/HLV Highlands Ranch, LLC (Highlands Ranch) should be approved, and under what conditions.The applicant is entitled to issuance of a mitigation bank permit, subject to reasonable time lag and risk factor scores. The applicant is not entitled to issuance of a variance from financial responsibility requirements.

05-004402GM FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.; FRIENDS OF MATANZAS, INC.; PATRICK HAMILTON; WILLIAM HAMILTON; AND PHIL CUBBEDGE vs TOWN OF MARINELAND AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 05, 2005

The main issue in this case is whether the Town of Marineland's Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by Ordinance 2005-1 on August 18, 2005,1 are "in compliance," as defined by Section 163.3194(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2005).2 Another issue is whether Petitioners have standing.3It was not proven beyond fair debate that the revision of plan of Town now all in CHHA is not "in compliance."

95-000259GM NICK GERACI, PETER GERACI, AND ADVANCE LEASING AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. vs HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 20, 1995

The issue presented for decision in this proceeding is whether a future land use map (“FLUM”) amendment, adopted by Hillsborough County on October 27, 1994, as part of its Comprehensive Plan update for the planning time frame through 2015 (variously referred to as the “Comprehensive Plan” or "CPU-2015"), that changed the future land use category on a 253 acre parcel1 in Northwest Hillsborough County ("the Geraci Parcel") from Regional Commercial ("RC") to Community Mixed Use-12 ("CMU-12") complies with the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Challenge to portion of 1994 Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan update; Petitioners failed to establish that proposed CMU-12 designation was non-compliant to the exclusion of fair debate.

89-005157GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 1989

The issue in the case is whether the Hillsborough County comprehensive plan is not in compliance for the reasons set forth in the petitions of Sierra Club, Inc.Plan not in compliance due to failure to depict on Future Land Use Map floodplains, historic propertiess, wells and cones of influence, inadequate stormwater loss standard, etc.

96-004752GM ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC., AND GARY BEARDSLEY vs COLLIER COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 09, 1996

The issue is whether proposed amendments to the Collier County comprehensive plan are in compliance with the criteria of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code.Comprehensive plan amendment reinstating agricultural exemptions in Big Cypress area of critical state concern not supported by data and otherwise not in compliance

94-005409 STEPHEN J. DIBBS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 1994

The issue for consideration in this hearing is whether Petitioner, Stephen J. Dibbs, should be issued a permit by the Department of Environmental Protection to fill 2.014 acres of jurisdictional wetlands on his property located at the intersection of North Dale Mabry Highway and Hoedt Road, Hillsborough County, as applied for in permit application No. 292103383.APPLICANT FOR DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT HAS SHOWN THAT PROJECT HAS BEEN MINIMIZED AS BEST CAN BE DONE AND MITIGATION PLAN IS ADEQUATE; REC PERMIT TO BE ISSUED.

90-006639GM SIERRA CLUB, INC., AND MANASOTA-88 INC. vs HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 19, 1990

Thomas William Reese