Leon FL Administrative law, Land use and zoning and Oil and -- eLawyers

12-003369EPP IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, POLK POWER STATION, POLK 2-5 COMBINED CYCLE CONVERSION PROJECT vs * (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 2012

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether the Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the Siting Board, should certify the Polk 2-5 Combined Cycle Conversion Project (“Project”) of Tampa Electric Company ("TEC"), including its associated electrical transmission lines, subject to the proposed Conditions of Certification.It is recommended that the Siting Board certify the Project because it favorably satisfies all of the statutory factors that are to be considered under section 403.509(3), Florida Statutes.

09-006641EPP IN RE: GAINESVILLE RENEWABLE ENERGY CENTER, LLC, PPSA NO. PA09-54 vs * (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 07, 2009

The issue in this case is whether the Siting Board should grant a site certification to Gainesville Regional Energy Center, LLC (GREC) for the construction and operation of a 100-megawatt (MW) biomass-fired electrical power plant in Gainesville, Florida, pursuant to Sections 403.501 through 403.518, Florida Statutes.Applicant entitled to a certificate on existing site for biomass-fired power plant of 100 MW in Gainesville after applicant provided reasonable assurance that need outweighed environmental consequences and broad public interest served by the new plant.

07-002713EPP IN RE: PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 UPRATE PROJECT POWER PLANT SITING APPLICATION NO PA77-09A2 vs * (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 18, 2007

Recommend that the Power Plant Siting Board certify Florida Progress Energy`s Crystal River Unit 3 nuclear generating facility, including the 180 MW Uprate Project.

07-005691TL IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY AND PROGRESS ENERGY COMPANY`S LAKE AGNES-GIFFORD TRANSMISSION LINE SITING APPLICATION NO. TA07-16 vs * (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 2007

The issue for determination is whether either of the proposed transmission line corridors for the proposed Lake Agnes-Gifford 230 kV transmission line comply with the criteria in Section 403.529(4), Florida Statutes, and if so, which of those corridors has the least adverse impacts with respect to the criteria in Section 403.529(4), Florida Statutes, including cost. If one of the corridors proper for certification is determined to have the least adverse impacts, the issue is whether certification of that corridor should be approved in whole, with modifications or conditions, or denied. See § 403.529(4) and (5), Fla. Stat. If the two corridors are found to be substantially equal in adverse impacts regarding the criteria in Section 403.529(4), Florida Statutes, including costs, the Siting Board shall certify the Joint Applicants' Preferred Corridor. See § 403.529(5)(c), Fla. Stat.Applicants` proposed corridor for new transmission line in Orange, Polk and Osceola counties was certified as proposed and determined to be superior to the alternate corridor proposed by intervenor.

07-000105TL IN RE: FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY BOBWHITE-MANATEE 230KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT TRANSMISSION LINE SITING APPLICATION NO. TA07-14 vs * (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 2007

It is recommended that a corridor be certified which combines segments of two of the proposed corridors.

07-004745TL IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY WILLOW OAK-WHEELER-DAVIS TRANSMISSION LINE SITING APPLICATION NO. TA07-15 vs * (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 2007

The issue for determination is whether and the extent to which the proposed corridor by Tampa Electric Company (TECO) contained in its Application for Corridor Certification (Application) should be approved in whole, with modifications or conditions, or denied.The application for a proposed corridor in which to place a transmission line between western Polk County and Brandon is approved; electric and magnetic fields would not affect the health of adjacent property owners.

03-004099 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF JUPITER INLET DISTRICT vs PAUL THIBADEAU AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 05, 2003

The issues are whether Respondent Thidadeau is entitled to a Noticed General Permit, pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-341.427, and a Letter of Consent, pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule, to construct a single family dock in the central embayment of the Loxahatchee River in Palm Beach County.The Applicant is entitled to a Noticed General Permit and Letter of Consent to build a dock in an aquatic preserve, but the Letter of Consent requires the Applicant to remove existing dock and not to moor boats that require more than two feet of water.

Toni Lee Sturtevant