Leon FL Administrative law, Litigation and Real Property Law -- eLawyers

18-003295 IN RE: PETITION TO ESTABLISH THE HARMONY RANCH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs * (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 25, 2018

The issue in this proceeding was whether the Petition to Establish the Harmony Ranch Community Development District (Petition) meets the applicable criteria in chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Chapter 42-1.Based on the record evidence, the Petition to Establish The Harmony Ranch Community Development District satisfied all of the applicable statutory requirements. Therefore, the Commission should formally adopt a rule establishing the District.

14-005657GM ALERTS OF PBC, INC., PATRICIA D. CURRY, ROBERT SCHUTZER, AND KAREN SCHUTZER vs PALM BEACH COUNTY (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 26, 2014

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the amendments to the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan (“the Comp Plan”) adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County by Ordinance No. 14-030 (“Proposed Amendments”) are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2014).Palm Beach County's determination that the proposed amendments to its comprehensive plan are in compliance is fairly debatable.

11-000584GM DIANE BROWN vs BAY COUNTY (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 07, 2011

The issue to be determined in this case is whether Amendment 10-01A to the Bay County Comprehensive Plan (“the Plan Amendment”), adopted by Ordinance 10-22, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1Petitioner failed to prove beyond fair debate that the Bay County's comprehensive plan amendment was not in compliance.

06-004544GM 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC.; AND ROSA DURANDO vs PALM BEACH COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2006

The issues in this case are whether the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan amendments which changed the future land use designations for a 97.55-acre parcel and a 26.23-acre parcel through the adoption, respectively, of Ordinance 2006-28 and Ordinance 2006-29, are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2007).1Two amendments to the Future Land Use Map of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan are not in compliance with state law because they create internal inconsistancies.

09-001204GM PATRICIA D. CURRY, ALEXANDRIA LARSON, SHARON WAITE, AND PATRICK WILSON vs PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 2009

The issue in this case is whether the amendments to the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan adopted by Ordinances 2008- 048, 2008-049, and 2008-050 are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008).1/Petitioners failed to prove beyond fair debate that the challenged comprehensive plan amendments are not in compliance.

06-000881GM DIANE BROWN AND PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 2006

The issues in this case are whether Amendments 05-02B, 05- 02C, 05-02G, and 05-02H to the Bay County Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") are “in compliance” as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.2Sanctions under 57.105 awarded in the amount of $250, plus interest.

07-005755GM LESEMAN FAMILY LAND PARTNERSHIP; WALTER E. MURPHREE, JR.; AND DEBRA C. TREECE, vs CLAY COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 20, 2007

The issue in this case is whether the amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the Clay County Comprehensive Plan, adopted by Ordinance No. 2007-53, is “in compliance” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2007).1Petitioners failed to prove that the designation of 47 acres as Rural Fringe was not "in incompliance."

Vinette Dawn Godelia