Leon FL and Privacy Lawyers | Virlindia A Doss -- eLawyers

98-000370EC IN RE: WELLINGTON ROLLE vs * (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 1998

The issues for determination are: (1) whether Respondent Wellington Rolle, as the former Director of Personnel for the City of Opa-Locka (City of Opa-Locka or City), violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by using his position to seek from the City payment to which he was not entitled; and (2) whether Respondent John Riley, as the former Assistant City Manager of the City of Opa- Locka, violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by using his position to seek from the City payment to which he was not entitled; and (3) if so, what penalty is appropriate.No corrupt intent shown where assistants to city manager signed personnel forms that resulted in their receiving retroactive salary payments. Assistants had performed work for which they were compensated.

97-002954EC IN RE: GARY D. LATHAM vs * (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 26, 1997

Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by engaging in unsolicited and unwanted sexually or romantically oriented behavior toward a subordinate female employee, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Parole commissioner sexually harassed female employee. Advocate established this by clear and convincing evidence.

95-003717EC IN RE: GARY LATHAM vs * (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 25, 1995

Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by engaging in unsolicited and unwanted sexually or romantically oriented behavior toward a subordinate female employee, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.A Final Order should be entered finding Petitioner guilty of violating Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes. A civil penalty of $4,000 should be imposed, together with the issuance of a public censure and reprimand.

96-002926EC IN RE: WILLIAM CAMPION vs * (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 19, 1996

Whether William Campion, Respondent, as president of Central Florida Community College, violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by using public resources in furtherance of his work with Excel Telecommunications, Inc., and if so, what penalty should be recommended.Duplication of tapes and use of college facilities not violation of ethics code where policy allowed such for public and staff. No corrupt intent.

95-004141EC IN RE: PHILIP LEE SULLIVAN vs * (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 22, 1995

Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty is appropriate.Police chief's security consultant business conflicted with Police duties.

94-005835EC IN RE: ROBERT HOFFMAN vs * (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 1994

Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be recommended.Fire district commissioner did not touch or kiss dispatcher. No violation of statute.

94-004715EC IN RE: LAWRENCE R. HAWKINS vs * (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 1994

Whether Respondent violated Sections 112.3148(2)(a) and 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.County commissioner guilty of sexually harassing employee, misuse of county equipment and employees and failure to disclose trip on financial disclosure.

93-000313EC IN RE: MITCHELL KINZER vs * (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 1993

On September 18, 1991, the Florida Commission on Ethics (EC) entered its order finding probable cause that Respondent, Mitchell Kinzer, a member of the Surfside Town Commission, violated section 112.313(6), F.S., by improperly using public funds for personal purposes; and that he violated section 112.3135(2)(a), F.S., by participating in his wife's appointment to the Community Center Advisory Board. The issues for disposition are whether those violations occurred, and if so, what penalty or discipline is appropriate.Resp. obtained reimburesement for expenses not properly related to public duty and voted to approve wife's appointment to a city board-fine of $300.

94-005524EC IN RE: MIRIAM ALONSO vs * (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 30, 1994

Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes.Call to 911 did not violate Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes.

94-001511EC IN RE: WALTON NEEDHAM SEILER vs * (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 17, 1994

Whether Respondent violated Sections 112.313(6),(7) and 112.3145, Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent guilty of ethics violations used county employees for personal business, used position to advocate for variance for contractor his company had bid with.

Virlindia A Doss