Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Wallace L. Richardson, II
Wallace L. Richardson, II
Visitors: 47
0
Bar #544728(FL)     License for 22 years
Coral Springs FL

Are you Wallace L. Richardson, II? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

86-002462  SARASOTA COUNTY vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 22, 1987
The issue in this case is whether Falconer is authorized to keep finger piers, a wooden deck and an enclosed walkway, which were constructed without permits within the landward extent of Elligraw Bayou, a Class 3 waterbody located in Sarasota County, upon the payment of a $3600 penalty. Specifically, the issue is whether the piers, deck and covered walkway, as built, would have been permitted by the Department if properly applied for, and whether Falconer has provided reasonable assurances that these structures, and the alteration of mangroves in connection therewith, will not violate state water quality standards, and will not be contrary to the public interest as provided in Section 403.918(2), Florida Statutes.Respondent permit for construction is approved because he provided reasonable assurances that the construction is not contrary to public interest.
81-002174  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES vs. SMITH BROTHERS OIL COMPANY, INC., AND BARNETT`S TEXAS  (1981)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 14, 1982
Refund given when found that pumps were not contaminated, but rather pumps inadvertently had the wrong panel indicators affixed during price change.
79-001217  PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES COUNCIL vs. JUDY A. CAIN  (1979)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 15, 1980
Whether Respondent's teacher's certificate should be revoked pursuant to Section 231.28, Florida Statutes, for alleged sale of marijuana, as set forth in Petition, dated May 11, 1979. The parties stipulated to the expected testimony of Petitioner's witnesses, and Respondent did not call any witnesses at the hearing. The parties further stipulated to the admission of Petitioner's Exhibits 1-5 and to Respondent's Composite Exhibit 1. This is an administrative proceeding whereby the Petitioner seeks to take adverse action concerning the teaching certificate of the Respondent based on an allegation the Respondent sold marijuana to a police officer on September 1, 1978. The matter was reported by the Superintendent, Polk County Public Schools, to Petitioner by letter of February 21, 1979. (Petitioner's Exhibit 3) The Petition herein was thereafter filed pursuant to directions of the State Commissioner of Education who on May 11, 1979, found probable cause to justify disciplinary action under the provisions of Section 231.28, Florida Statutes. Respondent requested an administrative hearing by Answer, dated May 22, 1979. Respondent filed a prehearing Motion to Strike the Petition on the grounds that the Polk County Superintendent improperly referred the matter to Petitioner on the basis of Respondent's nolo contendere plea in a criminal proceeding, and had suspended her from employment without an evidentiary hearing. The motion further alleged that Petitioner based its probable cause finding upon hearsay evidence and that it has no authority to make a finding of criminal guilt without a judicial adjudication of the same. Respondent's Motion is denied. Petitioner's Rule 6A-4.37, Florida Administrative Code, prescribes procedures for revoking or suspending certificates. It provides, inter alia, that when a superintendent has "cause to believe" that a certificate holder is "guilty of any offense" for which the penalty is revocation or suspension, it is his duty to file a "signed report" with any supporting documentation with Petitioner. Such a report merely triggers an investigation by Petitioner's staff for consideration by its Executive Committee and ultimate finding of probable cause by the Commissioner of Education. All of these procedures are preliminary in nature. No definitive action can be taken against a certificate holder and no final adverse action may be taken without an opportunity for an adversary hearing. The cases cited by Respondent in support of the notion deal with evidentiary standards for the issuance of final orders and do not relate to such preliminary matters. Petitioner observed the requirements of its rules procedurally in this case.Respondent's license should be revoked for two years for grossly immoral conduct setting bad example for students.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer