Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TUSKAWILLA MONTESSORI SCHOOL vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, 04-002769 (2004)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 04-002769 Visitors: 13
Petitioner: TUSKAWILLA MONTESSORI SCHOOL
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Judges: DANIEL MANRY
Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Aug. 06, 2004
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, November 2, 2004.

Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2004
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent should revoke Petitioner's license to operate a child care facility for failure to comply with the Director Credential requirements in Subsection 402.305(2)(f), Florida Statutes (2003), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 65C-22.003(7).Respondent failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner did not satisfy statutory director credentialing requirements.
04-2769

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


TUSKAWILLA MONTESSORI SCHOOL,


Petitioner,


vs.


DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 04-2769

)

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Daniel Manry conducted the administrative hearing of this case on September 29, 2004, in Orlando, Florida, on behalf of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Terry DeLong, pro se

Tuskawilla Montessori School 1625 Montessori Point

Oviedo, Florida 32765


For Respondent: Beryl Thompson-McClary, Esquire

Department of Children and Family Services

400 West Robinson Street, Suite S-1106 Orlando, Florida 32801


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue is whether Respondent should revoke Petitioner's license to operate a child care facility for failure to

comply with the Director Credential requirements in

Subsection 402.305(2)(f), Florida Statutes (2003), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 65C-22.003(7).

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By letter dated January 15, 2004, Respondent notified Petitioner that Respondent intended to revoke Petitioner's license to operate a child care facility on the grounds that Petitioner failed to document its compliance with the relevant Director Credential requirements. Petitioner timely requested an administrative hearing.

At the hearing, Petitioner testified and submitted three exhibits for admission into evidence. Respondent presented the testimony of two witnesses and submitted 11 exhibits for admission into evidence. The identity of the witnesses and exhibits and the rulings regarding each, are set forth in the record of the hearing. Neither party requested a transcript of the hearing. Petitioner filed a Proposed Recommended Order on October 12, 2004. Respondent did not file a proposed recommended order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Respondent is the state agency responsible for registering family day care homes in Florida. Petitioner is licensed as a child care facility and has operated as a child care facility since October 4, 1990.

  2. It is undisputed that Petitioner has satisfied all of the Director Credential requirements, except one. Respondent alleges that Petitioner has not provided Respondent with written verification that Petitioner successfully completed 20 hours of courses required to be certified as a Child Development Associate (CDA).

  3. Petitioner completed the courses required to be a CDA in September 1988, but the record of completion is no longer available from the former state agency responsible for administering the program and maintaining those records. Respondent admits that routine licensing inspection reports by Respondent document that Petitioner completed the courses necessary for the CDA certificate in September 1988, and subsequent inspections never cited Petitioner for failure to comply with the CDA requirement. The testimony of Ms. Terry DeLong, Petitioner's director, was credible and persuasive.

  4. Petitioner has satisfied all of the Director Credential requirements. Respondent should not revoke Petitioner's license because another state agency failed to maintain its records. It would be unreasonable to require Ms. Delong to repeat the courses she has already completed in order to keep operating the child care facility.

  5. The statutory requirement for a CDA certificate is intended to ensure minimal standards of competence. The

    legislature did not intend to put competent child care facilities out of business because state agencies are unable to maintain records of completion.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  6. DOAH has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this case. §§ 120.569 and 120.57(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). The parties received adequate notice of the administrative hearing.

  7. Respondent has the burden of proof in this proceeding.


    Respondent must show by clear and convincing evidence that


    Ms. DeLong did not satisfy the CDA requirements. Department of Banking and Finance v. Osborne Stern and Co., 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996).

  8. For the reasons stated in the findings of fact, Respondent failed to satisfy its burden of proof. Rather, the evidence is clear and convincing that Ms. DeLong satisfied the CDA requirements, but was unable to provide a certificate because another state agency failed to maintain the record of completion. Respondent's own records adequately document

Ms. DeLong's successful completion of the CDA requirements.

RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that Respondent enter a final order finding that Petitioner has satisfied the statutory Director Credential requirements.

DONE AND ENTERED this 2nd day of November, 2004, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

DANIEL MANRY

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 2nd day of November, 2004.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Beryl Thompson-McClary, Esquire Department of Children and

Family Services

400 West Robinson Street, Suite S-1106 Orlando, Florida 32801


Terry DeLong

Tuskawilla Montessori School 1625 Montessori Point

Oviedo, Florida 32765

Paul F. Flounlacker, Agency Clerk Department of Children and

Family Services Building 2, Room 204B 1317 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


Josie Tomayo, General Counsel Department of Children and

Family Services Building 2, Room 204

1317 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 04-002769
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 02, 2004 Recommended Order (hearing held September 29, 2004). CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 02, 2004 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Nov. 01, 2004 Letter to Judge Manry from T. DeLong regarding the completion of the twenty-four hour certificate required for T. Delong`s director`s certificate filed.
Oct. 12, 2004 Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed by Petitioner).
Sep. 29, 2004 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Sep. 20, 2004 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 29, 2004; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL; amended as to Hearing room).
Sep. 17, 2004 Compliance with Order of Pre-hearing Instruction (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Aug. 17, 2004 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Aug. 17, 2004 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 29, 2004; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
Aug. 10, 2004 Respondent`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 06, 2004 Initial Order.
Aug. 06, 2004 Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
Aug. 06, 2004 Notice of Violation filed.
Aug. 06, 2004 Notice (of Agency referral) filed.

Orders for Case No: 04-002769
Issue Date Document Summary
Nov. 02, 2004 Recommended Order Respondent failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner did not satisfy statutory director credentialing requirements.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer