Findings Of Fact Jerry Franklin, Sr., owns funeral establishments bearing the name of Franklin Funeral Home in Tampa, Lakeland and Avon Park, Florida. He is not licensed by Petitioner as a funeral director or embalmer. Each of these locations is licensed as a funeral establishment. Nettie Fay Franklin is the daughter of Jerry Franklin, Sr., and is a licensed funeral director and embalmer. She was so licensed at all times here relevant. Jerry Franklin, Jr., was a licensed funeral director and embalmer until his license was revoked in 1977. He was unlicensed at all times here relevant. Thomas F. Nelson, Jr., was licensed as a funeral director and embalmer until he surrendered his license to Petitioner in April of 1982, at which time he was dropped as a party-respondent in Case 82-669. Willie B. Williams was licensed as a funeral director and embalmer until he died in December, 1981. He was dismissed as a party-respondent in Cases 82-1494 and 82-1495. Ed Farmer operated the Franklin Funeral Home in Avon Park, Florida, during the latter part of 1980 and the first part of 1981. He was never licensed as a funeral director or embalmer. During the time he operated this funeral home he performed the services of a funeral director such as arranging for and conducting funerals, although, without a license, performance of such services is unauthorized. Diane Gossett, an investigator for the Department of Professional Regulation, visited the Franklin Funeral Home in Avon Park, Florida, on November 16, 1981. The sign on the door said Franklin Funeral Home, Willie W. Benton, Licensed F.D.. & Emb. in Charge." No one. responded to the door bell and there was no evidence of persons present. No evidence was presented that Benton was not registered as a funeral director and embalmer. The Benton funeral director sign was erected by Jerry Franklin, Sr., in September, 1981, while in the company with Leo Huddleston. Clara Mae Foster died on 31 March 1981. Her adult grandchildren contacted Jerry Franklin, Sr., who transported the body from the hospital to the Avon Park funeral home on that date. These grandchildren went to the Franklin Funeral Home the following day to make arrangements for the funeral. There they talked to Jerry Franklin, Sr., who showed them caskets and discussed the price of the funeral services, transportation, flowers, time for viewing the body, etc. When told they wanted the funeral on Saturday, April 4, Franklin replied that he had to go to Jacksonville for his son's funeral on that date and it was agreed Jerry Franklin, Jr., would conduct the funeral services. Funeral services for Foster were scheduled for 11 a.m. on April 4, 1981, and around 11:30 a.m. Jerry Franklin, Jr., came to the home of the Foster family to collect the balance of the amount owed for the funeral. Some arguments arose and a grandson wrote out a check for Franklin which he reportedly refused to accept and demanded cash. Nevertheless, the funeral proceeded with Franklin, Jr., apparently in charge of all functions. No witness reported seeing Nettie Fay Franklin at this funeral although Jerry Franklin, Sr., testified she was in charge of this funeral. Nettie Fay Franklin prepared the Foster body for burial after it was transported to the Franklin Funeral Home in Avon Park. Leo Huddleston, an investigator for Petitioner, visited all of the Franklin funeral establishments several times while conducting his investigation. He last visited the Tampa funeral home around June 1, 1982, and the name on the funeral director sign at this funeral home still read "Thomas Nelson," although Thomas Nelson had surrendered his license in April, 1982. In July, 1981, when Huddleston visited the Franklin Funeral Home in Avon Park, the sign read "Jerry and Nettie Franklin, Jr., Funeral Directors in Charge." In September, 1981, Huddleston visited the Avon Park facility in company with Jerry Franklin, Sr., who installed a sign reading "William B. Benton, Licensed F.D. & Emb. in Charge." In April, 1981, the sign at Lakeland Franklin Funeral Home had the name J. T. Bronson and the telephone number but did not indicate Bronson was the funeral director or embalmer. Huddleston also visited the Lakeland establishment with Jerry Franklin, Sr., September, 1981, at which time Franklin installed a hand-lettered sign reading "Nettie Franklin Lic. F.D. & Emb. in Charge." Jerry Franklin's testimony, that he believed he could legally perform funeral director functions if a licensed funeral director was at the funeral home, is not credible. According to his own testimony, Franklin has been in the funeral business since he was 12 years old, some 53 years. Charges similar to those here involved were brought against the Franklin Funeral Home in Tampa in 1977 and Jerry Franklin, Sr., participated in those proceedings. His son, Jerry Franklin, Jr., lost his license as a funeral director after disciplinary proceedings had been brought against him. Jerry Franklin, Sr., was well aware that in preparing the funeral arrangements with the relatives of Foster he was performing acts the law requires be performed by a licensed funeral director. By his own admissions (Exhibit 5) he acknowledged that he frequently discussed and prepared funeral arrangements with the survivors of the deceased. It is only his claim, that he believed such actions proper so long as a licensed funeral director is on the premises, that is not believed. His conduct in selling caskets and making funeral arrangements is not surprising when performed by the owner of the funeral home living on the premises. Jerry Franklin, Sr., Lives at the Franklin Funeral Home in Tampa. The Lakeland and Avon Park Funeral Homes failed to report the number of cases embalmed and bodies handled at those funeral homes during 1981 and 1982. All of the cases embalmed and bodies handled at the three funeral homes were reported by the Tampa funeral home.
Findings Of Fact Dale Woodward, the Respondent, holds Funeral Director's License No. 671 and Embalmer's License No. 536 at the present time, and during the times pertinent to 1978 and January through 1979. The Respondent Dale Woodward is the owner of the Dale Woodward Funeral Home of Holly Hill, Florida. The Dale Woodward Funeral Home holds an establishment operating License No. 123. During all times relevant to the allegations in the complaint, Ricky Charles Vyse and Richard G. McCafferty were employees of Dale Woodward and the Dale Woodward Funeral Home. In early 1978, one Howard McMurray made arrangements with Dale Woodward for his own funeral seven to eight months prior to his death. Mr. McMurray stated that he would prefer to have his funeral similar to that of his wife, which arrangements had earlier been handled by the Dale Woodward Funeral Home. On December 19, 1978, Howard McMurray passed away and his body was delivered to the Dale Woodward Funeral Home. On the morning of December 20, Violet Eggleston, his executrix, and her husband Raymond, came to the funeral home. Mrs. Eggleston was met by Mr. Woodward and Mr. McCafferty and introduced to Mr. McCafferty by Mr. Woodward. Although Mrs. Eggleston stated in her deposition (Exhibit 12) that she did not meet Mr. Woodward upon coming into the funeral home, she did state that he might have been painting or hanging wallpaper and that she would not have recognized him with painting clothes on and in fact Mr. Woodward's testimony establishes that he was painting the funeral home that day and was dressed in old clothes and his presence at the funeral home on that morning is corroborated by Mrs. Eggleston's later statement that Mr. Woodward introduced her to Mr. McCafferty at the time they began to discuss funeral arrangements. Mr. McCafferty was introduced to Mrs. Eggleston and obtained some information for the preparation of death certificates as well as for Mrs. Eggleston's desires regarding arrangements for funeral services. Mr. McCafferty also assisted Mrs. Eggleston on behalf of the family in making funeral selections from the Respondent's stock of caskets and urns. Mrs. Eggleston was not the person considered in sole charge of arranging for Mr. McMurray's funeral in that she was not the next of kin, rather the deceased's daughter Diana Keeley apparently had some responsibility in arranging for the funeral, although Mrs. Eggleston was primarily responsible for making the subject arrangements and indeed paid for the Respondent's services herself. Mr. McCafferty did not complete a sale of a casket or urn to Mrs. Eggleston, although she did select a salix casket that day. These preliminary negotiations and discussions of the funeral arrangements and the obtaining of a casket engaged in by Mr. McCafferty with Mrs. Eggleston were at the direction of Respondent Dale Woodward, the subject licensed funeral director, and Mr. McCafferty himself was not present at the funeral. On or about December 22, 1978, the same day, Mrs. Eggleston signed an authorization for the cremation of the body of Howard McMurray and he was subsequently cremated at the Cedar Hill Crematory in Daytona Beach, Florida. The body was removed from the casket in which it had been placed for viewing and was cremated in a cardboard cremation container, The value of that cremation container or the sales price, was substantially less than that of the $865 casket. Neither Mrs. Eggleston nor Diana Keeley, the decedent's daughter, ever gave any written instructions regarding the manner of cremation of the body of Howard McMurray as to the container which should be used, nor does the record reflect that any written instructions or understandings passed between these two ladies and Mr. Woodward or his employees. Mrs. Eggleston's instructions regarding the cremation were verbal and made no provision for the type container to be used in the cremation process. Ricky Charles Vyse was employed by the Dale Woodward Funeral Home on or about June, 1978. At that time, and at times subsequent thereto, he represented that he was qualified to embalm human bodies as an apprentice or intern embalmer in that he had submitted papers registering him for such internship to the Florida Board of Funeral Directors. Dale Woodward and Dale Woodward Funeral Home believed and relied upon that representation, thus permitting Ricky Vyse to assist or participate in embalming procedures. The Respondent Dale Woodward supervised any embalming procedures in which Ricky Vyse participated. Particularly, Dale Woodward did virtually all cosmetic work, including that in the cases involving the decedent, Howard McMurray, as well as with regard to the funeral and embalming of Mary Salvonge. Further, evidence adduced at the hearing revealed that Ricky Vyse had never actually been registered as an intern embalmer with the Board of Funeral Directors and the testimony of four of Respondent's witnesses revealed that Ricky Vyse had been detected on a number of occasions stealing office records and various items of property from the funeral home, including an embalming machine, a Beethoven bust, a desk globe, and other items. After repeated warnings, the Respondent Dale Woodward through his employees Franklin Muffley and Richard McCafferty terminated Ricky Vyse's employment. It was evident from the demeanor of Ricky Vyse on the witness stand that he was a disgruntled employee and hostile former employee of the Respondents, and that be approached the State Attorney in January, 1979 with accusations against Dale Woodward and the Dale Woodward Funeral Home involving violations such as those involved herein. The record reflects that no prosecution was initiated by the State Attorney's office. Franklin Muffley is the internal auditor and bookkeeper for the Dale Woodward Funeral Home. As such he is responsible for the billing in cases such as the McMurray case. It is his practice and custom to gather all figures and data regarding funeral arrangements, verify them and routinely mail a statement within approximately two weeks following a funeral service. In the McMurray case however, the executrix, Mrs. Eggleston, made payment on the day the funeral arrangements were made before any written itemization for funeral services to be rendered was finalized or verified by Muffley. As a result, after having been shown the salix casket priced at $865, she proceeded to pay for the casket, as well as for the other arrangements for a total of $1,785. The record is not clear whether Franklin Muffley or Richard McCafferty who were privy to the discussions of arrangements and price with Mrs. Eggleston that morning knew that the decedent would be cremated in a cardboard container. Dale Woodward, the Respondent in this case, did not learn of the fact that Mrs. Eggleston had been billed for the casket which was not used in the ultimate disposition of the body of Mr. McMurray until approximately three months later, in about March of 1979, when, as it was his regular custom and practice, he instituted his quarterly review of his business's billing and receipts. Having been closely acquainted with the McMurray family and being aware of the arrangements Mrs. Eggleston had requested for Mr. McMurray's funeral (i.e., cremation), Mr. Woodward detected an error in billing due to the charge for the casket which was not ultimately used except for display purposes. Mr. Woodward thereupon immediately made a refund to Mrs. Eggleston of $805 representing the price charged her for the casket less the $60 charge legitimately due and owing for the cardboard cremation container. Dale Woodward and Dale Woodward Funeral Home have been in operation and licensed approximately 25 years and have never been the subject of such complaints and charges heretofore. The Respondents Dale Woodward and Dale Woodward Funeral Home, as established by the four "character witnesses," enjoy a good reputation for truth and veracity in the community
Findings Of Fact Upon consideration of the oral and documentary evidence produced at the hearing, the following relevant facts are found: At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Larkins was licensed as an embalmer and funeral director by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued licensed numbers FE 2310, E 2310 and FD 2106. At all times pertinent to this proceeding the Respondent Anderson was licensed as a funeral director and embalmer by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license numbers FE 2204, E 2204 and FD 2003. At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Evans was licensed as an embalmer and funeral director by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license numbers FE 790, E 790 and 672. At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Stone was licensed as a funeral director and embalmer by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license numbers FE 459, E 459 and 205. At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Stone Funeral Home was licensed as a funeral establishment by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license number FH 214. The corporate officers of said establishment are Fannie B. Stone, President; Rosalyn Gordon, Secretary- Treasurer; and Raymond S. Gordon, Vice-President. Raymond S. Gordon's address is the same as the Respondent funeral establishment, 2401 East Columbus Drive, Tampa, Florida. Neither Raymond S. Gordon nor Rosalyn Gordon have ever been licensed as a funeral director, embalmer, funeral director intern or embalmer intern by the Florida Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers. James Williams was a licensed funeral director in charge of Williams Funeral Home, Plant City, Florida, between October 1979 and March 1980. Williams was never the licensed funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment. On or about October 28, 1976, the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers was advised that Respondent F.B. Stone had replaced William Gordon as the funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment. The Respondent Anderson replaced Respondent F.B. Stone as the funeral director in charge of Respondent establishment on August 4, 1980, and prior to that time, Respondent Anderson was the funeral director in charge of a Lakes Wales funeral home. The Respondent Anderson notified the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers that he was no longer the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment as of August 27, 1980. It was not until on or about October 1, 1980, that the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers was advised that Respondent Evans was the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment. By letter dated May 14, 1981, Respondent Larkins notified the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers that he was the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment as of April 1, 1981. As a normal course of conduct, affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled by the Respondent funeral establishment were filed with the local registrar of vital statistics, more than five working days after the end of each month The following chart sets forth the months in question and the actual date of filing of the affidavits with the local registrar of vital statistics: MONTH ACTUAL DATE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT January 1980 February 28, 1980 February 1980 April 7, 1980 March 1980 October 14, 1980 April 1980 October 14, 1980 May 1980 October 14, 1980 June 1980 October 14, 1980 July 1980 October 14, 1980 August 1980 October 14, 1980 September 1980 (Signed October 7, 1980) October 1980 (Received by Board December 1, 1980) November 1980 (Signed December 9, 1980) December 1980 January 29, 1981 January 1981 February 5, 1981 February 1981 March 18, 1981 March 1981 June 26, 1981 April 1981 June 26, 1981 May 1981 June 26, 1981 June 1981 July 9, 1981 July 1981 (Signed August 5, 1981) August 1981 November 4, 1981 September 1981 November 4, 1981 October 1981 January 3, 1982 November 1981 January 3, 1982 December 1981 January 3, 1982 January 1982 February 14, 1982 February 1982 April 9, 1982 March 1982 April 9, 1982 April 1982 May 6, 1982 May 1982 June 4, 1982 June 1982 July 12, 1982 (Petitioner's Exhibit 1) The Respondents were placed on notice, both written and oral, of the lateness of filing the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled. A review of Petitioner's Exhibit 1, the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled, reflects that between July 1979 and September 1979, the affidavits were signed by Elliot C. Bruton as the funeral director in charge when the evidence demonstrates that Respondent F.B. Stone was the licensed funeral director in charge. Between October 1979, and March 1980, James Williams signed the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled as the funeral director in charge when the evidence demonstrates that Respondent F.B. Stone was the licensed funeral director in charge and Williams was the licensed funeral director in charge of another establishment. Between the dates of April 1980, and July 1980, Respondent Anderson signed the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled as the funeral director in charge when the evidence demonstrates that Respondent F.B. Stone was the funeral director in charge and Respondent Anderson was employed as the funeral director in charge during this same time period at a Lake Wales funeral home. Respondent Anderson informed an investigator for the Department of Professional Regulation that affidavits for the months of April through July were signed by him and submitted based upon the request of a previous Executive Director of the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers. However, Respondent Anderson also informed the investigator that after submitting the affidavits he remembered that the affidavits were incorrect in certain material respects as to the embalmer, but Respondent Anderson has never attempted to amend the affidavits. While the affidavit for September 1980, lists E. Marion Evans as the embalmer and the funeral director in charge, by letter dated October 7, 1980, the Respondent Evans informed the Board that he was the funeral director in charge as of October 1, 1980. On or about November 1981, the Respondent funeral establishment amended its exterior sign to delete the name of Respondent F.B. Stone as the funeral director in charge and display instead the name of the actual full-time funeral director in charge, at that time, Respondent Larkins. In late March 1981, Dessie Alexander's son, Alfred Alexander, died and Mrs. Alexander made arrangements through Respondent funeral establishment to have her son buried. She called the Respondent funeral establishment and left word for Raymond Gordon to call her back. Raymond Gordon then called her and she told him she wanted to release her son's body to him. Raymond Gordon then came to Dessie Alexander's home and asked her to sign a release paper so that he could pick up the body at the morgue, which she signed. Raymond Gordon called her later and asked her to come to the Respondent funeral establishment to make funeral arrangements. She and her family arrived at the Respondent funeral establishment and, with the assistance of Raymond Gordon, chose a funeral casket. Raymond Gordon took the family to the cemetery to purchase a cemetery lot for the burial. At the Respondent funeral establishment, Raymond Gordon assisted the family in determining the exact funeral arrangements necessary. Marion Evans, although present at the funeral establishment building at certain times, was not involved in the formulation of the funeral arrangements and did not act in a supervisory capacity over Raymond Gordon. Raymond Gordon wrote the funeral purchase contract, and after determining and itemizing the charges, had the family sign the contract. At the funeral service of Alfred Alexander at a local church, Raymond Gordon and Rosalyn Gordon were present, with Ms. Gordon making the payments to the pianist and minister while Raymond Gordon coordinated the funeral services. Respondent Evans was not involved in conducting the funeral service of Alfred Alexander. During this time period, Respondent Evans was the funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment. Thelma Collins utilized the Respondent funeral establishment on April 29, 1981, when her son, Anthony Bethea, died. Ms. Collins spoke with Raymond Gordon and then he, Stanley Larkins and another unidentified person came to her home. Raymond Gordon spoke with Ms. Collins at her home. At this time, Ms. Collins and Raymond Gordon discussed picking up the body, the time of death and other information concerning the deceased. Ms. Collins' funeral purchase agreement, Petitioner's Exhibit 4, was executed at the Respondent funeral establishment and was drafted, discussed and explained by Raymond Gordon to Ms. Collins when no other employees or agent of the Respondent funeral establishment was present. The funeral service was conducted at a local church and Raymond Gordon, Rosalyn Gordon and an unlicensed workman for the Respondent funeral establishment attended. Ms. Collins does not remember the presence of Respondent Larkins at the funeral service. Marie Butler's sister, Cora Evans, died in January 1980, and the Respondent funeral establishment handled the funeral arrangements and services. Raymond Gordon arranged the funeral service, determined prices and contractual terms and conditions, assisted in determining the arrangements to be made for the funeral service, and conducted and directed the funeral services at the church and grave site. In June 1980, when Respondent Larkins was the registered funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment, Marie Butler's brother died. Raymond Gordon again personally handled all the funeral arrangements and services by arranging the funeral service, determining prices and contractual terms and conditions, assisting in determining the arrangements to be made for the funeral service, and conducting and directing the funeral services. Respondent Larkins was physically present during most of these activities but did not directly supervise the arrangements of the funeral services. Virgilio O'Farrell died on May 11, 1981, during the time that Respondent Larkins was the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment. Gail Blackman arranged the funeral services for Mr. O'Farrell through Respondent funeral establishment. Ms. Blackman did not recall dealing with Respondent Larkins in arranging the funeral services through Respondent funeral establishment, but dealt instead with two unknown men from the Respondent funeral establishment. Respondent Larkins testified that during his employ at Respondent funeral establishment, April 1980 through the present, he has been the only licensed funeral director representing the Respondent funeral establishment. Respondent Larkins remembered the Thelma Collins' transaction. On this occasion as well as others, Raymond Gordon was present but Larkins did most of the talking regarding the funeral arrangements. He remembered this particular case because it was the first funeral arrangement he handled in Progress Village. The affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled were late in being properly filed due to the fact that Raymond Gordon was acting as the courier of the affidavits and he failed to timely post the same.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED: That a Final Order be entered placing the Respondents Larkins, Evans, Anderson, Stone and Stone Funeral Home on reporting probation for a period of two years and imposing an administrative fine of $750 per Respondent. During the probationary period, the Respondents should be required to regularly certify to the Board that they are complying with all requirements of Chapter 470, Florida Statutes in a timely and accurate manner. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of November, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. SHARYN L. SMITH Hearing Officer Department of Administration Division of Administrative Hearings Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 8th day of November, 1981.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that (1) Respondent Randell E. Aultman be found guilty of violating Sections 470.036(1)(e) and (o) on three occasions by reason of his failure to timely file death certificates and that Aultman be found guilty of violating the same statutes for failure on three occasions to timely obtain a burial-transit permit and to see that such permits accompanied the bodies when being transported out-of-state, and (2) Respondent The American Funeral Home be found guilty of violating Subsections 470.036(1)(e) and (o) on four occasions by reason of its failure to timely file death certificates, and that American be found guilty of violating the same statutes for failure to timely obtain burial- transit permits on five occasions and to see that such permits accompanied the bodies when being transported out-of-state. It is further RECOMMENDED that Respondent Aultman be given a public reprimand and that Respondent The American Funeral Home be given a public reprimand and required to make six monthly filings as set forth in the Conclusions of Law portion of this order. DONE and ENTERED this 5th day of April, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. DONALD R. ALEXANDER Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of April, 1982.
Findings Of Fact William E. Manker, Jr. and Manker Funeral Home are licensed as Funeral Director License No, 905 and Embalmer License No. 1007. Accordingly the Hearing Officer has jurisdiction over the Respondents and the alleged offenses. In October, 1977 Hobby Tillman, a registered nurse who worked part time for Manker, told Louis C. Slater, a forensic technician at the DCMEO that he could make it worthwhile to Slater if he could provide information on bodies at the morgue which led to these bodies being turned over to Manker for interment. Manker suggested to Tillman that such representation be made to an employee of DCMEO. Tillman was paid by Manker only for services he performed at specific funerals. No agreement was made between Manker and Tillman whereby the latter would receive additional compensation for any business he brought to the funeral home. Tillman had worked for several other funeral homes in the Miami area and had picked up bodies at the DCMEO for these other homes. He was a salaried employee for House of Albert funeral home for a period of time but in October and November 1976 the only funeral home at which he was working was Mankers. Slater reported this offer to his superiors who notified the Dade County Public Safety Department. The case was assigned to Detective Buckley and Sergeant Beirne who arranged for Slater to call Tillman at the Manker Funeral Home to accept his offer and arrange a meeting for the exchange of information for money. On November 9, 1976 Slater called the number of Manker Funeral Home and asked to speak to Bobby. An individual purporting to be Tillman talked with Slater, and Manker was made aware of this conversation. This call was taped when both police officers assigned to this investigation were present in the room with Slater. During this conversation Slater stated he would accept Tillman's offer and would call later for an appointment to meet him. The tape and transcription thereof constituted Exhibits 2 and 1 respectively. The police officer who was present and transcribed a copy of this tape testified that the transcription was an accurate reproduction of the conversation; however, the other police officer who was also present, testified that only Slater's voice could be heard in the room. Absent evidence of an open mike in the room the testimony that only Slater's voice could he heard by the police officer is obviously correct. No witness identified the voice purporting to be Bobby on the other end of the line; and Tillman, in whose presence the copy offered as the new Exhibit 2 was played, denied that the voice was his or that he ever talked to Slater over the phone. On November 17, 1976 Slater called the Manker Funeral Home to speak to Hobby to set up a meeting to pass to him the name of a body at the morgue. At this point the testimony diverges. Slater testified the call was made between 12 noon and 1:00 p.m. Tillman testified that he was told the call came about 10:00 a.m. Slater testified he talked to Tillman while the latter's testimony was that he was working at his nursing job at the time of the call and didn't arrive at the funeral home until after 1:00 p.m. Upon Tillman's arrival at the funeral home he was advised by another Manker employee of the message received from Slater to meet him at the South China Cafe at 2:00 p.m. that day. Tillman was in his nurse's uniform and was driven home by Manker to change clothes. Then he was driven by Manker to the South China Cafe, stopping en route at a drug store where Manker had a prescription filled and purchased sun glasses. Upon arrival at the South China Cafe on Northwest Tenth Street Manker remained in the car while Tillman entered the cafe and met with Slater. Slater told Tillman he had the name of a body and next of kin and asked if Tillman would give him something for the information. Tillman left the cafe and went to Manker's car, spoke to Manker and returned to the cafe. Before returning to the table where Slater was waiting Tillman ordered a hot dog and coke and took these to the table where Slater waited. With respect to these events again the testimony varied principally as to detail. Slater testified he didn't give the paper containing the fictitious name that had been supplied him by the police until after Tillman gave him ten dollars. Tillman testified he took the piece of paper with the names to show Manker from whom Tillman got twenty dollars. Part of this twenty dollars was used to purchase his hot dog and coke, ten dollars was given to Slater for the information and the balance was pocketed by Tillman. Manker's version of the events was that Tillman wanted a ride to pick up a prescription at Jackson Memorial Hospital Pharmacy on Northwest Tenth Street across from the South China Cafe, and since he had to go in that direction to pick up his own prescription he agreed to take him. Manker drove Tillman home to change clothes then drove him to Northwest Tenth Avenue. Tillman came back to the car for a short visit to advise Manker he would be a few minutes longer, but according to Manker, Tillman made no request for money nor did he give him any money. Manker further testified he did not even know Tillman was to meet with Slater. Slater had been wired for sound for the cafe meeting with Tillman but background noises rendered their conversation unintelligible to the police officer monitoring the conversation a few tables away. After the paper with the names had been exchanged for ten dollars, Slater, as a prearranged signal to the police of this fact, dropped a coin on the floor as he got up to leave. When exiting the cafe Tillman was arrested and booked at county jail. A preliminary search at the jail did not produce the paper that had been given Tillman by Slater but shortly thereafter one of the wardens saw Tillman throw something in the waste basket which the warden retrieved and turned over to Detective Buckley who identified it as the paper he had given to Slater with the fictitious names. Prior to his subsequent trial Tillman agreed with the State's Attorney that in exchange for a plea of guilty and testimony against Manker he would be given probation. Tillman pleaded guilty to offering a bribe and was placed on probation.
Findings Of Fact At times pertinent to this proceeding, Lewis J. Howell has been licensed as a funeral director and embalmer under the laws of the State of Florida, license numbers FE 1442, FD 1270, and E 1442. Further, Howell Morning Glory Chapel has been licensed as a funeral establishment under the laws of the State of Florida, license number FH 1092. Respondent Howell has acted as the only funeral director in charge, and owner of Respondent Funeral Establishment. The testimony of Assistant to the Executive Director of the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, Department of Professional Regulation, established that for the 1979/1981 renewal period for licensure of funeral directors and embalmers, Respondent Lewis J. Howell issued a check on November 1, 1979, to cover renewal fees and late penalties. This check was dishonored by the bank, and funds covering the returned check were received by the Department of Professional Regulation on or about January 18, 1980. The 1981/1983 renewal of the funeral director and embalmer licenses of Respondent Howell, were due as of September 1, 1981. After that date the licenses would become inactive. By a check dated March 3, 1982, Respondent Howell remitted to the Department/Board a check in the amount of $230 for renewal of embalmer and funeral director licenses and licenses for these capacities were issued by the Department/Board based upon this check. The check was later dishonored by the bank. Funds covering the dishonored check were received by the Department on or about August 4, 1982. On March 31, 1982, Crawford C. Richardson, Jr., investigator for the Department of Professional Regulation, went to the Respondent Funeral Establishment for the purpose of conducting an inspection of the premises. Due to Respondent Howell's absence, the investigator informed the attendent that he would return the next day at 9:00 a.m. On April 1, 1982, Investigator Richardson returned to the Respondent Funeral Establishment at 9:00 a.m., and met Respondent Howell. When he entered the Respondent Funeral Home he smelled a very strong, putrid odor emitting from the side of the building where the preparation room was located. Based upon his previous experience, Richardson identified this as the smell of decaying bodies. Richardson noted the following deficiencies on the April 1, 1982, inspection: No hand basin in the preparation room. No operating table in the preparation room. Embalming tools were rusted and dirty. Ceiling of the chapel was partially collapsed. Ceiling in the preparation room was water damaged. No sanitary waste receptacle was present. Ventilation equipment in the preparation room was inoperable. Entire funeral establishment was dirty and had empty liquor bottles strewn about. No printed or typewritten list of retail prices or written agreement form was available as required by Sections 470.035, Florida Statutes. On April 26, 1982, Investigator Richardson returned for an announced follow-up inspection but Respondent Howell was not present. None of the corrective work noted from the April 1, 1982, inspection had been accomplished. After waiting for over an hour for Howell to return, Richardson informed the attendent that he would return the next day at 9:00 a.m. On April 27, 1982, at 9:00 a.m., Investigator Richardson returned to the Respondent Funeral Establishment and Howell informed Richardson that he had insufficient time to complete the repairs, but that he would have them completed by the following day. Richardson noted that there was an electrician repairing the ventilator fan and that a stainless steel operating table was in the preparation room. On that visit, Respondent Howell produced his funeral director and embalmer licenses issued by the State. Investigator Richardson informed Respondent Howell that he would return in one week. On May 4, 1982, Investigator Richardson arrived at the Respondent Funeral Establishment at 9:00 a.m. and noted that the exhaust fan had been repaired, but noted that a deceased body was lying on a makeshift plyboard table in the preparation room. The table was of a porous material which cannot be properly maintained. Respondent had several bodies in the Chapel of the Funeral Establishment on this visit and they, too, were lying on makeshift plyboard shelves. Respondent Howell informed Investigator Richardson that the stainless steel operating table Richardson had seen on the April 27 visit was being repaired but refused to state which repair shop it was located at. The hand sink had not yet been installed. The general condition of the funeral facility was still filthy, and no written price lists or agreements were available. The preparation room floors were dirty and there were no sanitary waste receptacles present. As to the written price lists and agreements, Howell told Richardson that he had not had time to accomplish this requirement, so Investigator Richardson showed him several examples of these written documents from other funeral establishments to aid him in this task.
Recommendation From the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED: That the licenses of Respondent Howell as a funeral director and embalmer, and the license of the Funeral Establishment, be suspended until the Respondents present to the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers a plan for reentry into the practice of funeral directing and embalming that will insure that the statutes and rules governing such practice will be followed and that, thereafter, their licenses be placed on probation for one year subject to continued adherence to such statutes and rules. DONE and ENTERED this 30th day of December, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. R. T. CARPENTER, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 30th day of December, 1982. COPIES FURNISHED: Joseph W. Lawrence, II, Esquire Dept. of Professional Reg. 130 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. Lewis H. Howell 669 Florida Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Bruce Barcelo, Acting Executive Director Board of Funeral Director and Embalmers Room 507, 111 East Coastline Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32301 Samuel R. Shorstein, Secretary Department of Professional Regulation 130 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301
