The Issue The ultimate issue is whether, the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services may intercept Daniels' income tax refund. However, this turns on the issue of whether Daniels has been delinquent in excess of 3 months. Factually, Daniels owed money for aid provided his child. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services has obtained a judgement in the amount of $6,673 upon which Daniels is to make payments of $25/month. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services argues that Daniels owes and has been delinquent on the $6,673 since the order was entered. Daniels argues that he is not over three months in arrears on his payments of $25/month. The evidence introduced by Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services shows Daniels is in arrears only $27.91 on his payments on the judgement. The issue is whether Section 45 CFR Section 303.72 requires a delinquency in payments required to be made on the amount of money established in a court order.
Findings Of Fact On October 10, 1981, Carol Renee Neal assigned to the State of Florida her rights to child support for Latoya v. Daniels, acknowledged child of Ira Clayton Daniels. An Order was entered on January 14, 1985, which established that Ira Clayton Daniels owed the State of Florida $6,673 for a public assistance child support obligation and provided that Ira Clayton Daniels would pay $25/month until the $6,673 was repaid. The records of the Department, Daniels' Exhibit 1, reflect Daniels has made regular payments on the debt, and at the time of the hearing owed $27.91 arrearage on the debt. Daniels was less than three months in arrears on his payments established by the Order referenced above.
Recommendation Based upon the foregoing, the claim against Ira Clayton Daniels should be dismissed. DONE AND ORDERED 16th day of September 1986 in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. STEPHEN F. DEAN Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 FILED with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 16th day of September 1986. COPIES FURNISHED: Warren J. Schulman, Esquire Assistant General Counsel Child Support Enforcement Program 105 East Monroe, Suite 101 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Frederick J. Simpson, Esquire HRS District IV Legal Counsel Post Office Box 2417 Jacksonville, Florida 32231-0083 Ira C. Daniels 8904 Greenleaf Road Jacksonville, Florida 32208
The Issue The issues for determination are: (1) whether Petitioner is delinquent in child support payments; (2) if yes, what is the amount of the delinquent child support; and (3) whether Respondent is authorized to levy Petitioner’s two bank accounts at the Bank of America and apply the funds to reduce or satisfy Petitioner’s outstanding arrearage for child support.
Findings Of Fact On April 11, 1996, a judicial hearing officer in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Orange County, Florida (Orange County Circuit Court), issued a Report and Recommendation of Hearing Officer on Paternity and/or Other Issues (Report). The Report found that Petitioner, Gary Walther (Petitioner), was the natural father of two minor children and recommended that he pay $200.00 per month for each child. The Report also recommended that the child support payments commence on May 5, 1996, and that they be made through the Clerk of the Circuit Court. On April 11, 1996, the Orange County Circuit Court issued an Income Deduction Order (Order) in State of Florida, Department of Revenue, on behalf of Theresa Walther v. Gary Walther, Case No. 86-1675. The Order directed any employer or any other person providing or administering income to Petitioner to deduct from such income $400.00 per month for periodic child support and to pay this amount to the Clerk of the Court. According to the Order, the $400.00 "reflects on-going child support of $200.00 per month, per child, for two minor children." On May 15, 2000, a judicial hearing officer issued a Report and Recommendation in Department of Revenue v. Gary Walther, Case No. 86-1675, in the Orange County Circuit Court. The Report and Recommendation abated Petitioner’s on-going child support payments as of April 24, 2000; found Petitioner $10,468.76 in arrears in child support as of April 24, 2000; and recommended that Petitioner pay an additional payment of $200.00 per month as payment on the arrears. These payments were to be made to the State of Florida, State Disbursement Unit, in Tallahassee, Florida. On May 15, 2000, the Orange County Circuit Court approved, confirmed and adopted as a Final Order the Report and Recommendation described and referred to in paragraph 3 above. On October 13, 1999, the Department sent a Notice to Freeze to the Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia. In the notice, which was sent by certified mail, the Department advised the Bank of America that Petitioner had a past due and/or overdue child-support obligation of $10,717.29 as of October 13, 1999. Moreover, the Department directed the bank not to transfer, dispose of, or return any credits, debts, or other personal property owned by or owed to Petitioner. On October 25, 1999, the Bank of America verified that it held two accounts identified as belonging to Petitioner. The funds in both accounts totaled $2,894.56. On October 15, 1999, the Department sent a Notice of Intent to Levy by certified mail to Petitioner. That notice provided in pertinent part the following: You are hereby notified that pursuant to Section 409.25656, Florida Statutes, the Department of Revenue intends to levy on credits, or personal property belonging to the obligor named above [Petitioner], or debts owed to the obligor. The property consists of liquid assets and is in the control of BANK OF AMERICA. This action is taken for nonpayment of child support by the obligor in the amount of $10,717.29 as of October 13, 1999. You are hereby notified that you may contest the agency’s action to levy on the above referenced property. You may do so by either filing an action in Circuit Court or by requesting an administrative hearing. If you wish to request an administrative hearing, you must file your petition for hearing, in writing, accordance with the Notice of Rights attached to this Notice. If you elect to file an action in Circuit Court, your complaint must be filed with the Clerk of Court within twenty-one (21) days of your receipt of this notice. . . . You may NOT request both an administrative hearing and a hearing in circuit court. Attached to the notice was a Notice of Rights form that detailed Petitioner's due process rights as provided for in Section 409.25656, Florida Statutes. The return receipt from the October 15, 1999, Notice of Intent addressed to Petitioner indicated that the Notice was delivered and received by someone at Petitioner’s address of record on or about October 20, 1999. On or about November 3, 1999, Petitioner filed a Petition for Formal Hearing (Petition), which requested a "formal hearing concerning the Notice of Intent to Levy" which he received October 19, 1999. The Petition listed Petitioner’s address as 234 Crabtree Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32835. On or about November 10, 1999, the Department issued and sent a Notice of Extension of Freeze to the Bank of America. The notice advised the bank that Petitioner had "filed an action in the circuit court or under Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, to contest the Department of Revenue’s intention to levy upon assets as specified in the Notice of Freeze." The Department further directed the Bank of America not to transfer, dispose, or return any credits, debts or other personal property owned/controlled by Petitioner and in the bank’s possession and control. Finally, the Notice of Extension of Freeze stated that the Notice remained effective "until final resolution of the circuit court or Chapter 120 action, and the Department issued a Notice of Levy or a Notice of Full or Partial Release of Freeze." On November 30, 2000, the Clerk of the Orange County Circuit Court prepared and issued an Arrearage Affidavit in Case No. 86-1675. The affidavit stated that the May 15, 2000, a Final Order issued by the court established that Petitioner's child support arrearage was $10,468.76. However, because of payments made by Petitioner, the affidavit noted that Petitioner's remaining established arrearage, as of the date of the affidavit, was $6,924.01. As of the date of the final hearing, Petitioner's outstanding arrearage for child support was $6,924.01. Notwithstanding his filing a Petition for Formal Hearing, Petitioner failed to appear at the hearing and no evidence was presented on his behalf.
Recommendation Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Department of Revenue enter a final order that (1) levies the $2,894.56 in the Petitioner's two bank accounts at the Bank of America; (2) applies the funds to reduce Petitioner's accrued child support arrearage of $6,924.01; and (3) credits Petitioner for said payment. DONE AND ENTERED this 6th day of March, 2001, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 6th day of March, 2001. COPIES FURNISHED: Albert Thorburn, Esquire Florida Department of Revenue Post Office Box 8030 4070 Esplanade Way Tallahassee, Florida 32314-8030 Gary Walther 5965 Spring Street Austell, Georgia 30168-4041 James Zingale, Executive Director Department of Revenue 5050 West Tennessee Street 104 Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100 Linda Lettera, General Counsel Department of Revenue 204 Carlton Building Post Office Box 6668 Tallahassee, Florida 32314-6668
The Issue The issues are whether Petitioner is delinquent in his child support payments; and if so, whether Respondent may levy the funds from Petitioner's bank account pursuant to Section 409.25656, Florida Statutes.
Findings Of Fact It is undisputed that Petitioner's child support obligation is ongoing. He admits that his overall monthly obligation is $312.00. As of October 24, 2001, Petitioner's was in arrears on his child support obligation in excess of $53.03. Petitioner has not made any payments toward his child support obligation since September 2000. On March 20, 2001, Respondent issued a Notice of Freeze. This notice advised Tampa Bay Federal Credit Union that Petitioner had a past-due and/or overdue child support obligation and that any funds held by Tampa Bay Federal Credit Union in Petitioner's name were frozen pursuant to Section 409.25656, Florida Statutes. At that time, Petitioner had funds in the amount of $53.03 in an account at Tampa Bay Federal Credit Union. On March 27, 2001, Respondent issued a Notice of Intent to Levy. This notice advised Petitioner that Respondent intended to levy on the $53.03 in Petitioner's account with Tampa Bay Federal Credit Union. According to the notice, Respondent intended to take the funds due to Petitioner's non- payment of child support. During the hearing, Petitioner stated that he did not object to Respondent's action to levy on the funds held by Tampa Bay Federal Credit Union. Accordingly, there are no disputed issues of material fact.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED: That Respondent enter a final order directing that $53.03 currently held at Tampa Bay Federal Credit Union be applied towards meeting the Petitioner's unpaid child support obligation. DONE AND ENTERED this 13th day of December, 2001, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. SUZANNE F. HOOD Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 13th day of December, 2001. COPIES FURNISHED: Michael A. Chang, DC #T18277 Gulf Forestry Camp 699 Ike Steele Road Wewahitchka, Florida 32465 Scott Edmonds, Esquire Department of Revenue Post Office Box 8030 Tallahassee, Florida 32314 Bruce Hoffmann, General Counsel Department of Revenue 204 Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100 James Zingale, Executive Director Department of Revenue 104 Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100
Findings Of Fact In 1968, Petitioner's marriage to Judith Marie Youmans was dissolved by the Circuit Court in Duval County, Jacksonville, Florida. One child, D. R. Y. was born of the marriage. Custody of D. R. Y. was given to Petitioner's ex- wife. However, except for a few months, D. R. Y. was in the actual custody of her father until she reached the age of majority in 1982. Petitioner's ex-wife never paid any child support to Respondent for his custody of D. R. Y. Petitioner never had the final divorce decree modified to reflect D. R. Y.'s custody arrangement or to seek an award of child support for his custody of D. R. Y. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services is not seeking child support enforcement in reference to D. R. Y. From 1968 until about 1977, Petitioner maintained an on again-off again relationship with his ex-wife. They never remarried. However, by 1977, Petitioner had fathered two children with his ex-wife, who are the subject of this action. C. D. Y., Jr., was born July 29, 1971, and M. S. Y. was born August 15, 1973. In 1977, Petitioner's ex-wife filed a paternity action against Petitioner alleging that the two boys were his children. Petitioner made an appearance in the paternity action and reached an agreement with his ex-wife regarding the paternity of the two boys and how much child support he would pay until they reached the age of majority. A final judgment incorporating the agreement between the parties was entered by the Circuit Court in Duval County, Jacksonville, Florida, on January 28, 1977. Petitioner states that he was never served with the 1977 paternity suit papers or the final judgment entered in the action. Petitioner testified that he was not aware that a final judgment had been entered awarding his ex-wife $15.00 per week per child until a few months before HRS became involved in the tax intercept under consideration here. However, Petitioner made two of the agreed to child support payments in February, 1977, after his attorney had advised him to do so. After the first two payments, Petitioner ceased making the $15.00 per child per week payments and has not made any child support payments to his ex-wife or to the Clerk's Office since February 4, 1977. Petitioner has, therefore, accumulated an alleged arrearage of child support for C. D. Y. and M. S. Y. in the amount of $16,35.00 through July 1987. Prior to HRS's involvement in the case in 1986, Petitioner's ex-wife neither asked for nor received any child support from Petitioner, except for the few payments made in 1977. She did not try to enforce the paternity settlement agreement until September 12, 1986, when she asked for HRS's help. Apparently, the reason she went to HRS was to attempt to collect the child support. She has not received any "public assistance" such as AFDC money from HRS and apparently is not asking for such aid. HRS has not obtained a court order finding Petitioner to be delinquent and no such order has been previously entered. Petitioner has, therefore, never been afforded an opportunity to raise his defenses to any alleged arrearage or non payment of support before the circuit court. Petitioner felt very strongly that he should not have to pay child support since his ex-wife did not perform her part of the agreement regarding her visitation. He testified that he attempted to visit the two boys on several occasions, but was usually frustrated in his attempts. The last time he attempted to visit the two boys was several years ago when he was met at the door by his ex-father-in-law who was pointing a shot gun at Petitioner and told him to leave. After the shot gun incident, Petitioner did not feel it to be in his best interest to attempt to see the boys anymore. Petitioner also maintained that he should not have to pay child support because she would not raise the boys correctly throughout the time period involved in this case. In essence, he left her because she would not give up certain drugs and he did not want to be living in such an environment nor did he want his boys to be living in such an environment. However, his ex-wife felt otherwise and didn't mind her children being raised around drugs. Petitioner felt that his ex-wife's involvement of HRS to collect child support was simply a tactic on her part to harass him and otherwise be mean. Petitioner also felt that he should have been paid child support for his custody of D. R. Y. who had refused to live with her mother. Petitioner felt that he should at least receive recognition of the fact that he did not receive any such support and be credited with the amount he should have been paid, i.e. $15.00 per week.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law it is RECOMMENDED: That the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services enter a Final Order in this case to the effect that the Department is not entitled to intercept Charles D. Youmans' federal tax refund unless and until Youmans is adjudicated delinquent by a circuit court in the periodic court ordered payment, and to the further effect that any federal tax refund which may already have been intercepted shall be returned to Youmans. DONE and ENTERED this 29th day of August, 1988, in Tallahassee, Florida. DIANE CLEAVINGER Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 29th day of August, 1988. APPENDIX TO RECOMMENDED ORDER, CASE NO. 88-2365 Petitioner's factual allegations contained in paragraph 1 of his letter are immaterial. Petitioner factual allegations contained in paragraph 2 are irrelevant. The factual allegation in the 1st sentence of paragraph 3 was not shown by the evidence. The rest of paragraph 3 is adopted. Paragraph 4, 5 and 7 are subordinate. Paragraph 6 is not shown by the evidence. Paragraph 8 discusses evidence not presented at the final hearing and is inadmissible. Paragraph 9 is irrelevant. COPIES FURNISHED: Charles D. Youmans, pro se Route 5, Box 44 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 Warren J. Schulman SCHULMAN, HOWARD & HEMPHILL, P.A. 331 East Union Street, Suite 1 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Sam Power, HRS Clerk Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Gregory L. Coler, Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Tom Batchelor Staff Attorney House HRS Committee The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1300 =================================================================
Findings Of Fact Based upon the testimony of the witnesses and the documentary evidence received at the hearing, the following findings of fact are made: The Petitioner is listed as the obligor for child support payments which are payable through the central governmental depository for Hillsborough County, Florida. According to the records maintained by Hillsborough County, as of November 7, 1990, the Petitioner owes $4073.61 for back child support. Petitioner did not dispute the accuracy of that amount at the hearing nor did she object to the entry of the records establishing that amount. Harold C. Ludwig, purportedly Petitioner's former husband who is also listed as the obligee to receive the child support payments from Petitioner, contacted the Department and requested assistance in connection with enforcing the court order authorizing child support. The Department has a contract with Mr. Ludwig and has searched the account history maintained by Hillborough County to determine the amount of arrearages owed by the Petitioner. The Department has standing requests from credit agencies for information on child support accounts where the arrearage amount exceeds $500.00. Based upon the conclusion that Petitioner owed an amount in excess of $500.00, the Department preliminarily determined this account to be subject to disclosure and gave the Petitioner notice of its intent to release the information regarding her arrearage to the credit agencies which have requested the information.
Recommendation Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services enter a final order denying Petitioner's challenge to the proposed agency action regarding the referral of child support arrearages to a credit reporting agency. DONE AND ENTERED this 17 day of January, 1991, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. Joyous D. Parrish Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 17 day of January, 1991. APPENDIX TO CASE NO. 90-4480 RULINGS ON THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER: 1. None submitted. RULINGS ON THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT SUBMITTED BY THE DEPARTMENT: 1. Paragraphs 1 through 3 are accepted. COPIES FURNISHED: Theodore J. Rechel Law Offices of DONALD W. BELVEAL 100 West Kennedy Boulevard Suite 600 Tampa, Florida 33602 Sandra A. Ludwig 3212 West Coachman Avenue Tampa, Florida 33611 Linda K. Harris, Esquire Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Building One, Suite 407 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 R.S. Power, Agency Clerk Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Building One, Suite 407 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
The Issue Whether Petitioner's Federal Income Tax refund should be intercepted by Respondent?
Findings Of Fact On August 17, 1984, the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, entered an order finding Petitioner to be in arrears in child support payments in the amount of $6,400.49. As of July 21, 1988, Petitioner was in arrears in his child support payments in the amount of $6,954.52. Petitioner does not dispute that he is in arrears in his child support payments, but argues that Respondent should not take the entire refund, but should only take one-half.
Recommendation Therefore, based upon the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent issue a final order affirming the determination that Petitioner owes past-due support. DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of August, 1988, in Tallahassee, Florida. JOSE A. DIEZ-ARGUELLES Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 24th day of August, 1988. COPIES FURNISHED: Johnny E. Matthews 4435 Kenndle Road Jacksonville, Florida 32208 Warren J. Schulman, Esquire 331 East Union Street, Suite 1 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Sam Power, Clerk Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Gregory L. Coler, Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
Findings Of Fact Based upon my observation of the witnesses and their demeanor while testifying, documentary evidence received and the entire record compiled herein, I make the following relevant factual findings: Petitioner, Enrique Rivera, was married to Emma Rivera on April 15, 1973, and of that marriage two children were born, Lisa and Tomas. A Final Judgement of Dissolution of Marriage was entered on September 8, 1980 in Dade County, Florida. On March 14, 1980, however, Petitioner's then spouse, Emma Rivera obtained an order of support in the 264th District Court of Bell County, Texas, (Texas) whereby she was awarded $75 every two weeks per child for child support for petitioner's two children. The child support payments were to commence on March 15, 1980. (Respondent's exhibit 1). The final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered by the circuit court of Dade County, Florida, on September 8, 1980, required petitioner to pay the sum of $75 every two weeks for child support based on the order of support issued in Texas. (Respondent's exhibit 2). During late 1987, petitioner, received a pre-offset notice from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) indicating that it would intercept and apply an IRS tax refund to fully or partially satisfy a past due child support obligation. (Respondent's exhibit 2). Petitioner signed a judgment agreement in Texas during 1980 wherein he agreed to pay child support in the amount of $75 per child every two weeks to Emma Rivera for the support of his minor children. (Respondent's exhibit 3). On January 9, 1980, Emma Rivera signed a uniform reciprocal enforcement of support petition seeking an order of support under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). Respondent, through its URESA Division, obtained copies of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, the support petition and the account master record display of the Clerk of the Court, Central Depository of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, Family Division. Based on information obtained from those copies, petitioner owed Emma Rivera child support arrearage in the amount of $14,436 as of July 15, 1988. (Respondent's composite exhibit 3). Petitioner disputes that he owes any child support arrearage and contends that the judgment agreement he signed in 1980 was altered after he signed it and that subsequent court orders relied upon that judgment to establish an incorrect amount for child support. Petitioner maintains that there was a typographical error in the Texas support order and that he was only obligated to pay $75 per month for each of the two children for a total of $150.00 per month. The agreement Petitioner signed in Texas however obligated him to pay child support in the amount of $75 per child every two weeks for his minor children. That support obligation shows that petitioner owes Emma Rivera a child support arrearage in the amount of $14,436 as of July 15, 1988. Petitioner sought an amendment to the Texas order of support and he has been unable to obtain any amendment to that order as of the date of this administrative hearing.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that: The respondent, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, enter a final order recommending that the Internal Revenue Service forward the sum collected from its intercept to the respondent forthwith for payment toward satisfaction of the child support arrearage due and owing Emma Rivera. DONE AND ENTERED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 1st day of November, 1988. COPIES FURNISHED: Phillip J. Coniglio, Esquire 12595 North East 7th Avenue North Miami, Florida 33161 JAMES E. BRADWELL Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 1st day of November, 1988. Deborah Magid, Esquire Assistant State Attorney Child Support Enforcement Division 1490 North West 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 33125 R. S. Power, Clerk Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Building One, Room 407 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Gregory L. Coler, Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Building One, Room 407 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 John Miller, Esquire Acting General Counsel Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services Fort Knox Executive Center 2727 Mahan Drive Suite 309 Tallahassee, Florida 32308
The Issue Whether the five thousand dollars of prize money claimed by the Petitioner should be paid to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services due to the Petitioner's outstanding debt for child support collected through a court.
Findings Of Fact The Petitioner is the individual whose name appeared on the lottery ticket and claim form for a five thousand dollar prize. The claim form and winning ticket were submitted by the Petitioner to the Tallahassee Office of the Department of the Lottery for validation and payment in accordance with that Department's procedures. The Department of the Lottery, as required by law, provided the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services with a list of five thousand dollar winners. The list contained the name of the Petitioner. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services compared the list with its records and determined that there was an arrearage in child support of eight thousand one hundred and fifty-seven dollars and eighty-four cents owed by the Petitioner in Lee County, Florida. On July 12, 1988, the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services certified the child support arrearage to the Department of the Lottery in accordance with Section 24.115(4), Florida Statutes. The Department of the Lottery fowarded the five thousand dollar prize money to the Office of the Comptroller. On July 19, 1988, the Petitioner was notified by certified mail by the Office of the Comptroller of its intention to apply the entire five thousand dollars towards the Petitioner's unpaid court ordered child support. The Petitioner requested a hearing on the nature of the debt and the amount owed. The amount of unpaid court ordered child support due on the date of the hearing was eight thousand one hundred and fifteen dollars and fifty-three cents.
Findings Of Fact Case No. 88-1323 On November 10, 1986, the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, entered an order finding Petitioner to be in arrears in child support payments in the amount of $3,099.30. As of July 21, 1988, Petitioner's arrearage for his child support payments was $2,430.71, Case No. 88-1324 On November 26, 1986, the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, entered an order finding Petitioner to be in arrears in child support payments in the amount of $665.00. Also, the court determined that Petitioner owed the State of Florida $3,082.00 as a public assistance obligation which had been previously established by the court. As of July 21, 1988, Petitioner was in arrears in the amount of $3,432.01 in his child support payments and in the public assistance obligation. Petitioner's Case Mr. Brown is currently making all the payments he is required to make under both court orders. He admits he owes the amount at issue in this case, although he believes there may be minor discrepancies in the records and he plans to pursue this with the agency responsible for record keeping.
Recommendation Therefore, based upon the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent issue a final order affirming the determination that Petitioner owes past-due support. DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of August, 1988, in Tallahassee, Florida. JOSE A. DIEZ-ARGUELLES Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 24th day of August, 1988. COPIES FURNISHED: Billy Lee Brown 3490 Lannie Road Jacksonville, Florida 32201 Warren J. Schulman, Esquire 331 East Union Street, Suite 1 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Sam Power, Clerk Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Gregory L. Coler, Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
