Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that (1) Respondent Randell E. Aultman be found guilty of violating Sections 470.036(1)(e) and (o) on three occasions by reason of his failure to timely file death certificates and that Aultman be found guilty of violating the same statutes for failure on three occasions to timely obtain a burial-transit permit and to see that such permits accompanied the bodies when being transported out-of-state, and (2) Respondent The American Funeral Home be found guilty of violating Subsections 470.036(1)(e) and (o) on four occasions by reason of its failure to timely file death certificates, and that American be found guilty of violating the same statutes for failure to timely obtain burial- transit permits on five occasions and to see that such permits accompanied the bodies when being transported out-of-state. It is further RECOMMENDED that Respondent Aultman be given a public reprimand and that Respondent The American Funeral Home be given a public reprimand and required to make six monthly filings as set forth in the Conclusions of Law portion of this order. DONE and ENTERED this 5th day of April, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. DONALD R. ALEXANDER Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of April, 1982.
Findings Of Fact William E. Manker, Jr. and Manker Funeral Home are licensed as Funeral Director License No, 905 and Embalmer License No. 1007. Accordingly the Hearing Officer has jurisdiction over the Respondents and the alleged offenses. In October, 1977 Hobby Tillman, a registered nurse who worked part time for Manker, told Louis C. Slater, a forensic technician at the DCMEO that he could make it worthwhile to Slater if he could provide information on bodies at the morgue which led to these bodies being turned over to Manker for interment. Manker suggested to Tillman that such representation be made to an employee of DCMEO. Tillman was paid by Manker only for services he performed at specific funerals. No agreement was made between Manker and Tillman whereby the latter would receive additional compensation for any business he brought to the funeral home. Tillman had worked for several other funeral homes in the Miami area and had picked up bodies at the DCMEO for these other homes. He was a salaried employee for House of Albert funeral home for a period of time but in October and November 1976 the only funeral home at which he was working was Mankers. Slater reported this offer to his superiors who notified the Dade County Public Safety Department. The case was assigned to Detective Buckley and Sergeant Beirne who arranged for Slater to call Tillman at the Manker Funeral Home to accept his offer and arrange a meeting for the exchange of information for money. On November 9, 1976 Slater called the number of Manker Funeral Home and asked to speak to Bobby. An individual purporting to be Tillman talked with Slater, and Manker was made aware of this conversation. This call was taped when both police officers assigned to this investigation were present in the room with Slater. During this conversation Slater stated he would accept Tillman's offer and would call later for an appointment to meet him. The tape and transcription thereof constituted Exhibits 2 and 1 respectively. The police officer who was present and transcribed a copy of this tape testified that the transcription was an accurate reproduction of the conversation; however, the other police officer who was also present, testified that only Slater's voice could be heard in the room. Absent evidence of an open mike in the room the testimony that only Slater's voice could he heard by the police officer is obviously correct. No witness identified the voice purporting to be Bobby on the other end of the line; and Tillman, in whose presence the copy offered as the new Exhibit 2 was played, denied that the voice was his or that he ever talked to Slater over the phone. On November 17, 1976 Slater called the Manker Funeral Home to speak to Hobby to set up a meeting to pass to him the name of a body at the morgue. At this point the testimony diverges. Slater testified the call was made between 12 noon and 1:00 p.m. Tillman testified that he was told the call came about 10:00 a.m. Slater testified he talked to Tillman while the latter's testimony was that he was working at his nursing job at the time of the call and didn't arrive at the funeral home until after 1:00 p.m. Upon Tillman's arrival at the funeral home he was advised by another Manker employee of the message received from Slater to meet him at the South China Cafe at 2:00 p.m. that day. Tillman was in his nurse's uniform and was driven home by Manker to change clothes. Then he was driven by Manker to the South China Cafe, stopping en route at a drug store where Manker had a prescription filled and purchased sun glasses. Upon arrival at the South China Cafe on Northwest Tenth Street Manker remained in the car while Tillman entered the cafe and met with Slater. Slater told Tillman he had the name of a body and next of kin and asked if Tillman would give him something for the information. Tillman left the cafe and went to Manker's car, spoke to Manker and returned to the cafe. Before returning to the table where Slater was waiting Tillman ordered a hot dog and coke and took these to the table where Slater waited. With respect to these events again the testimony varied principally as to detail. Slater testified he didn't give the paper containing the fictitious name that had been supplied him by the police until after Tillman gave him ten dollars. Tillman testified he took the piece of paper with the names to show Manker from whom Tillman got twenty dollars. Part of this twenty dollars was used to purchase his hot dog and coke, ten dollars was given to Slater for the information and the balance was pocketed by Tillman. Manker's version of the events was that Tillman wanted a ride to pick up a prescription at Jackson Memorial Hospital Pharmacy on Northwest Tenth Street across from the South China Cafe, and since he had to go in that direction to pick up his own prescription he agreed to take him. Manker drove Tillman home to change clothes then drove him to Northwest Tenth Avenue. Tillman came back to the car for a short visit to advise Manker he would be a few minutes longer, but according to Manker, Tillman made no request for money nor did he give him any money. Manker further testified he did not even know Tillman was to meet with Slater. Slater had been wired for sound for the cafe meeting with Tillman but background noises rendered their conversation unintelligible to the police officer monitoring the conversation a few tables away. After the paper with the names had been exchanged for ten dollars, Slater, as a prearranged signal to the police of this fact, dropped a coin on the floor as he got up to leave. When exiting the cafe Tillman was arrested and booked at county jail. A preliminary search at the jail did not produce the paper that had been given Tillman by Slater but shortly thereafter one of the wardens saw Tillman throw something in the waste basket which the warden retrieved and turned over to Detective Buckley who identified it as the paper he had given to Slater with the fictitious names. Prior to his subsequent trial Tillman agreed with the State's Attorney that in exchange for a plea of guilty and testimony against Manker he would be given probation. Tillman pleaded guilty to offering a bribe and was placed on probation.
Findings Of Fact Upon consideration of the oral and documentary evidence produced at the hearing, the following relevant facts are found: At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Larkins was licensed as an embalmer and funeral director by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued licensed numbers FE 2310, E 2310 and FD 2106. At all times pertinent to this proceeding the Respondent Anderson was licensed as a funeral director and embalmer by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license numbers FE 2204, E 2204 and FD 2003. At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Evans was licensed as an embalmer and funeral director by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license numbers FE 790, E 790 and 672. At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Stone was licensed as a funeral director and embalmer by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license numbers FE 459, E 459 and 205. At all times pertinent to this proceeding Respondent Stone Funeral Home was licensed as a funeral establishment by the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, having been issued license number FH 214. The corporate officers of said establishment are Fannie B. Stone, President; Rosalyn Gordon, Secretary- Treasurer; and Raymond S. Gordon, Vice-President. Raymond S. Gordon's address is the same as the Respondent funeral establishment, 2401 East Columbus Drive, Tampa, Florida. Neither Raymond S. Gordon nor Rosalyn Gordon have ever been licensed as a funeral director, embalmer, funeral director intern or embalmer intern by the Florida Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers. James Williams was a licensed funeral director in charge of Williams Funeral Home, Plant City, Florida, between October 1979 and March 1980. Williams was never the licensed funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment. On or about October 28, 1976, the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers was advised that Respondent F.B. Stone had replaced William Gordon as the funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment. The Respondent Anderson replaced Respondent F.B. Stone as the funeral director in charge of Respondent establishment on August 4, 1980, and prior to that time, Respondent Anderson was the funeral director in charge of a Lakes Wales funeral home. The Respondent Anderson notified the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers that he was no longer the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment as of August 27, 1980. It was not until on or about October 1, 1980, that the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers was advised that Respondent Evans was the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment. By letter dated May 14, 1981, Respondent Larkins notified the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers that he was the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment as of April 1, 1981. As a normal course of conduct, affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled by the Respondent funeral establishment were filed with the local registrar of vital statistics, more than five working days after the end of each month The following chart sets forth the months in question and the actual date of filing of the affidavits with the local registrar of vital statistics: MONTH ACTUAL DATE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT January 1980 February 28, 1980 February 1980 April 7, 1980 March 1980 October 14, 1980 April 1980 October 14, 1980 May 1980 October 14, 1980 June 1980 October 14, 1980 July 1980 October 14, 1980 August 1980 October 14, 1980 September 1980 (Signed October 7, 1980) October 1980 (Received by Board December 1, 1980) November 1980 (Signed December 9, 1980) December 1980 January 29, 1981 January 1981 February 5, 1981 February 1981 March 18, 1981 March 1981 June 26, 1981 April 1981 June 26, 1981 May 1981 June 26, 1981 June 1981 July 9, 1981 July 1981 (Signed August 5, 1981) August 1981 November 4, 1981 September 1981 November 4, 1981 October 1981 January 3, 1982 November 1981 January 3, 1982 December 1981 January 3, 1982 January 1982 February 14, 1982 February 1982 April 9, 1982 March 1982 April 9, 1982 April 1982 May 6, 1982 May 1982 June 4, 1982 June 1982 July 12, 1982 (Petitioner's Exhibit 1) The Respondents were placed on notice, both written and oral, of the lateness of filing the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled. A review of Petitioner's Exhibit 1, the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled, reflects that between July 1979 and September 1979, the affidavits were signed by Elliot C. Bruton as the funeral director in charge when the evidence demonstrates that Respondent F.B. Stone was the licensed funeral director in charge. Between October 1979, and March 1980, James Williams signed the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled as the funeral director in charge when the evidence demonstrates that Respondent F.B. Stone was the licensed funeral director in charge and Williams was the licensed funeral director in charge of another establishment. Between the dates of April 1980, and July 1980, Respondent Anderson signed the affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled as the funeral director in charge when the evidence demonstrates that Respondent F.B. Stone was the funeral director in charge and Respondent Anderson was employed as the funeral director in charge during this same time period at a Lake Wales funeral home. Respondent Anderson informed an investigator for the Department of Professional Regulation that affidavits for the months of April through July were signed by him and submitted based upon the request of a previous Executive Director of the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers. However, Respondent Anderson also informed the investigator that after submitting the affidavits he remembered that the affidavits were incorrect in certain material respects as to the embalmer, but Respondent Anderson has never attempted to amend the affidavits. While the affidavit for September 1980, lists E. Marion Evans as the embalmer and the funeral director in charge, by letter dated October 7, 1980, the Respondent Evans informed the Board that he was the funeral director in charge as of October 1, 1980. On or about November 1981, the Respondent funeral establishment amended its exterior sign to delete the name of Respondent F.B. Stone as the funeral director in charge and display instead the name of the actual full-time funeral director in charge, at that time, Respondent Larkins. In late March 1981, Dessie Alexander's son, Alfred Alexander, died and Mrs. Alexander made arrangements through Respondent funeral establishment to have her son buried. She called the Respondent funeral establishment and left word for Raymond Gordon to call her back. Raymond Gordon then called her and she told him she wanted to release her son's body to him. Raymond Gordon then came to Dessie Alexander's home and asked her to sign a release paper so that he could pick up the body at the morgue, which she signed. Raymond Gordon called her later and asked her to come to the Respondent funeral establishment to make funeral arrangements. She and her family arrived at the Respondent funeral establishment and, with the assistance of Raymond Gordon, chose a funeral casket. Raymond Gordon took the family to the cemetery to purchase a cemetery lot for the burial. At the Respondent funeral establishment, Raymond Gordon assisted the family in determining the exact funeral arrangements necessary. Marion Evans, although present at the funeral establishment building at certain times, was not involved in the formulation of the funeral arrangements and did not act in a supervisory capacity over Raymond Gordon. Raymond Gordon wrote the funeral purchase contract, and after determining and itemizing the charges, had the family sign the contract. At the funeral service of Alfred Alexander at a local church, Raymond Gordon and Rosalyn Gordon were present, with Ms. Gordon making the payments to the pianist and minister while Raymond Gordon coordinated the funeral services. Respondent Evans was not involved in conducting the funeral service of Alfred Alexander. During this time period, Respondent Evans was the funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment. Thelma Collins utilized the Respondent funeral establishment on April 29, 1981, when her son, Anthony Bethea, died. Ms. Collins spoke with Raymond Gordon and then he, Stanley Larkins and another unidentified person came to her home. Raymond Gordon spoke with Ms. Collins at her home. At this time, Ms. Collins and Raymond Gordon discussed picking up the body, the time of death and other information concerning the deceased. Ms. Collins' funeral purchase agreement, Petitioner's Exhibit 4, was executed at the Respondent funeral establishment and was drafted, discussed and explained by Raymond Gordon to Ms. Collins when no other employees or agent of the Respondent funeral establishment was present. The funeral service was conducted at a local church and Raymond Gordon, Rosalyn Gordon and an unlicensed workman for the Respondent funeral establishment attended. Ms. Collins does not remember the presence of Respondent Larkins at the funeral service. Marie Butler's sister, Cora Evans, died in January 1980, and the Respondent funeral establishment handled the funeral arrangements and services. Raymond Gordon arranged the funeral service, determined prices and contractual terms and conditions, assisted in determining the arrangements to be made for the funeral service, and conducted and directed the funeral services at the church and grave site. In June 1980, when Respondent Larkins was the registered funeral director in charge of the Respondent funeral establishment, Marie Butler's brother died. Raymond Gordon again personally handled all the funeral arrangements and services by arranging the funeral service, determining prices and contractual terms and conditions, assisting in determining the arrangements to be made for the funeral service, and conducting and directing the funeral services. Respondent Larkins was physically present during most of these activities but did not directly supervise the arrangements of the funeral services. Virgilio O'Farrell died on May 11, 1981, during the time that Respondent Larkins was the funeral director in charge of Respondent funeral establishment. Gail Blackman arranged the funeral services for Mr. O'Farrell through Respondent funeral establishment. Ms. Blackman did not recall dealing with Respondent Larkins in arranging the funeral services through Respondent funeral establishment, but dealt instead with two unknown men from the Respondent funeral establishment. Respondent Larkins testified that during his employ at Respondent funeral establishment, April 1980 through the present, he has been the only licensed funeral director representing the Respondent funeral establishment. Respondent Larkins remembered the Thelma Collins' transaction. On this occasion as well as others, Raymond Gordon was present but Larkins did most of the talking regarding the funeral arrangements. He remembered this particular case because it was the first funeral arrangement he handled in Progress Village. The affidavits of cases embalmed and bodies handled were late in being properly filed due to the fact that Raymond Gordon was acting as the courier of the affidavits and he failed to timely post the same.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED: That a Final Order be entered placing the Respondents Larkins, Evans, Anderson, Stone and Stone Funeral Home on reporting probation for a period of two years and imposing an administrative fine of $750 per Respondent. During the probationary period, the Respondents should be required to regularly certify to the Board that they are complying with all requirements of Chapter 470, Florida Statutes in a timely and accurate manner. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of November, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. SHARYN L. SMITH Hearing Officer Department of Administration Division of Administrative Hearings Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 8th day of November, 1981.
Findings Of Fact Thomas F. Nelson, Jr. is licensed by the Florida Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers as a Funeral Director and Embalmer and holds license number FE 0002843. He was so licensed at all times here relevant. Joan Kelly died 7 July 1980 and the body was given to Respondent for preparation. At the time, Respondent had an agreement to use the facilities at Stowers Funeral Home at 11301 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida, to prepare the body and hold funeral services. The body of Kelly remained at the funeral home for approximately five days before it was taken to the crematorium at Brandon, Florida. An incision had been made in the body to embalm, but the blood vessels had not been raised and the body was not embalmed. Respondent's testimony to the contrary, that he did embalm the body of Kelly, and the confirming testimony of Respondent's other witness is not believed. When Kelly's body was delivered to the crematorium some five days after death, the body was in an advanced state of decomposition, was turning green in color and emitted a strong odor of putrefaction. Respondent's witness could not account for his inability to detect an odor when he delivered Kelly's body to the crematorium while others could detect the odor. There was no evidence of maggots in the body as alleged in the Administrative Complaint. In 1979, Respondent and Richard Stowers, owner of Stowers Funeral Home, discussed an arrangement whereby Respondent could operate out of Stowers Funeral Home as an independent funeral director and pay, as rent, a percentage of the fees he received for services. Before these arrangements were finalized, Stowers went to the mountains on a vacation. When he returned, he found Respondent had moved in and was operating out of the address at 11301 North Florida Avenue, Tampa. Upon concluding the arrangements with Stowers, Respondent allowed his registration as a funeral home on Busch Boulevard to lapse. While using the facility at 11301 North Florida Avenue, Respondent was holding himself out as Thomas Nelson Funeral Home, P.A., and advertised in the yellow pages of the 1980 Tampa telephone directory that his address was 11301 North Florida Avenue. In the initial application for the 1980 yellow page ads, Respondent directed the address be omitted from the column in which "Thomas Nelson Funeral Home, P.A." was listed with other funeral homes. However, before the yellow pages are published, the proposed ad is presented to the advertiser, who has a final opportunity to make corrections before the yellow pages are printed. There was no record that Respondent objected to any of these ads. Respondent testified that he told the phone company to leave out the 11301 North Florida Avenue address from the yellow pages. He also testified that he researched the laws and determined that his method of operation as a Professional Association was legal. Respondent contended that Thomas Nelson Funeral Home, P.A., was a fictitious name even though he had formed the service corporation while he was operating a funeral establishment from an address on Busch Boulevard. Although the initial entry by Respondent to the funeral establishment at 11301 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, was with Stowers' implied, if not expressed, consent, Stowers received information that the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers frowned on two funeral homes being operated at the same address and attempted to terminate his agreement with Nelson. Since Nelson did not move voluntarily, in August, 1980, Stowers brought eviction proceedings against Nelson and obtained an eviction in September, 1980. Nelson contends that the ad he intended for the yellow pages was the photograph presented as Exhibit 3. It is noted that "Funeral Home" has been x- ed out on Exhibit 3 and that "Funeral Directors" has been substituted. The ad appearing on Exhibit 2 (p. 382, Tampa Yellow Pages 1980) has a different photograph of Nelson than the one presented in Exhibit 3. Otherwise, the printed information in this ad in Exhibit 2 is the same as the printed information on Exhibit 3, except for the telephone numbers, which are different. No explanation was presented for this disparity in telephone numbers, but the number in the yellow page ad with the photograph is the same number shown with the other five yellow page entries in which Nelson's name appears. Nelson introduced Exhibit 3 for the apparent purpose of showing the phone company makes mistakes.
