Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Andrea Valencia Nelson
Andrea Valencia Nelson
Visitors: 66
0
Bar #933260(FL)     License for 33 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Andrea Valencia Nelson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

98-003859  MICKEY PEPPER LIMOUSINE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 1998
Whether Petitioner is entitled to relocation and/or re- establishment assistance pursuant to Section 421.55, Florida Statutes, Chapter 14-66, Florida Administrative Code, and 49 CFR Part 24.Petitioner not entitled to re-establishment benefits because it was not operating its business from taken property.
98-002680  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs DERON`S CUSTOM SCREEN PRINTING  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 1998
Did the Department of Transportation properly issue Notice of Violation No. 10B LJM 1997 197 to Respondent pursuant to Chapter 479, Florida Statutes?The Department presented sufficient evidence to show that Respondent`s sign was not exempted from the requirements of permitting and that sign could not be permitted because of spacing requirements.
98-003300  VLENDA DORNSEIF vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 1998
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Petitioner received appropriate relocation assistance for her home and business as a result of the Department’s taking.Displaced resident has failed to show either a legal or factual basis for modifying the Department`s determination of appropriate residential and business displacement assistance payments.
97-001701  DONALD STEPHENS vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 02, 1997
Whether Petitioner's outdoor advertising sign on the east side of U. S. Highway 441, 1.2 miles north of State Road 46, in Lake County, Florida, can be maintained on the ground it is exempt from permitting requirements.Where no business activity on premises related to sign message, the sign did not qualify for exemption.
97-001417  ALLAN J. STOWELL vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 1997
The issue for consideration in this case is whether the permit for sign installation previously issued by the Department of Transportation is still valid to authorize Petitioner’s sign located on State Road 60 in Pinellas County.Petitioner failed to conform to terms of city ordinance and without approval of his sign by city, DOT could not grant permit for sign.
97-004956  ANTHONY BLACK AND MELISSA OWEN vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 21, 1997
Whether Petitioners maintained a separate household within a multiple occupant displacement dwelling for purposes of calculating the appropriate amount of their relocation assistance benefits.Petitioners failed to establish that they maintained a separate household within a single-family dwelling shared with others. Application for relocation benefits denied.
97-004403  BILL SALTER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 17, 1997
Whether Petitioner's application for two state sign permits to place a two-sided outdoor advertising sign on the east side of State Road 291 in Escambia County, Florida should be approved.Application for permit because of spacing requirement denied where sign visible from I-10, even though intended to be seen from adjacent state road.
97-001704  POZ OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 02, 1997
At issue in this proceeding is whether Petitioner's applications to erect a steel monopole which would support a two- sided outdoor advertising sign to be located west of Interstate Highway 95 (I-95), 2,244 feet north of I-95's intersection with Indrio Road, St. Lucie County, Florida, should be approved.Location of proposed sign violated the Department's rule on minimum spacing requirements and, therefore, application for sign permit properly denied.
96-002969  MAXMEDIA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 24, 1996
Petitioner, Republic Media, Inc., seeks an outdoor advertising sign permit for a two-sided sign to be located on Interstate 4 in Orlando, Florida. The permit was denied because the proposed sign would conflict with (violate spacing requirements) a previously permitted sign. The issue for disposition is whether Petitioner’s permit should be granted. More specifically, disposition requires a determination of whether the previously permitted sign is “on” Interstate 4.Sign is "on" interstate even if barely visible from the interstate and if it is within the controlled area (600 feet).
97-001988  BAYSHORE INN vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 29, 1997
The issue is whether Petitioner’s motel is entitled to designation on a logo sign located at an exit on Interstate 75.Motel that is not visible from or located at interstate intersection is not entitled to designation on logo sign.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer