Pinellas FL Lawyers | Barbara Ann Dell McPherson -- eLawyers

89-001187 CELESTE H. TIEMSANGUAN vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 14, 1989

The issue in this case is whether Celeste H. Tiemsanguan (Petitioner) abandoned her career service position with the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (Respondent).Petitioner is presumed to have abandoned her position because she did not follow the required procedures to obtain approval for 6 months maternity leave.

86-001039 BEVERLY LASSOR vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 09, 1987

Absolutely no merit to charge of discrimination; HRS did everything possible to accommodate and please ill-tempered, non-productive employee

86-004181 DENNIS J. DONEGAN vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 24, 1987

Petitioner not qualified by education to take laboratory technologist exam

86-003504BID JAMES P. GILLS AND MARGARET R. GILLS vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 15, 1986

Whether the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in determining to award the bid for its district office to Koger Properties, Inc. (Koger) and whether the petitioner submitted the lowest and best bid under the terms of the bid specifications.Respondent's bid is ruled as best bid based on a comparative assessment of the facilities and the evaluation criteria included in the Invitiation To Bid.

85-003654 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. FRANCES KEY, D/B/A FRAN'S PLACE (1985)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 20, 1986

Whether Respondent, Fran's Place, violated provisions of Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes, and the provisions of Chapter 10A-5, Florida Administrative Code, and whether and in what amount a civil penalty should be imposed; and Whether Respondent should be granted renewal of its license for its Adult Congregate Living Facility because of alleged violations of Chapter 400 of the Florida Statutes and Chapter 10A-5 of the Florida Administrative Code, and whether said violations constituted an intentional negligent act seriously affecting the health, safety or welfare of the residents.Adult Congregate Living Facility was found violating Health and Rehabilitative Services rules relating to fire safety, medication, and food on hand. Fined $1500 and close checks were recommended.

86-000307 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. DARLINGTON CORPORATION, D/B/A DARLINGTON HOUSE (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 02, 1986

Whether the Respondent violated Rule 10A-5.19(5)(d), Florida Administrative Code. Whether the Respondent violated Rule 10A-5.20 or 5.24(1)(d)1,a, Florida Administrative Code. Whether the Respondent violated Rule 10A-5.182(2)(d)1 and 2, Florida Administrative Code. Both parties have submitted post-hearing Proposed Findings of Fact. A ruling has been made on each proposed finding of fact in the Appendix to this Recommended Order.Adult Congregate Living Facility fined for failure to have copies of it's nutritional policies on premium. Requirement to develop job descriptions did not require to be on premises.

81-001603 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. SHIVE NURSING CENTERS OF FLORIDA, INC. (1981)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 17, 1981

Because patient developed bedsores and nurse notes didn't reflect preventive therapy for them, issue admonition. Drop other charges.

80-002272 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. M. B. JONES, D/B/A PALMETTO PALMS ADULT CONGREGATE (1980)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 18, 1981

The evidence shows that Jones continued to operate an adult congregate living facility after her application for license renewal was denied. The primary issue of law is whether the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services has jurisdiction to impose a fine on a person whose license, according to the Department's own complaint, has expired and whose application for renewal has been denied, for operating without a license.Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS) cannot levy civil fine for operating an Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) without a license. It is the license which confers jurisdiction.

80-002139 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. J. ARMAND MARTIN (1980)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 13, 1981

The parties stipulated that the sole issue to be resolved was whether the Respondent misrepresented his application by failing to reveal the existence of certain water on his property.Recommend not rescinding septic tank permit where drawing accurately shows past local officials didn`t ID wet area as "surface water."

79-002489 ELINOR BURGER vs. ALEX RUTKOWSKI AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1979)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 15, 1980

Whether a septic tank construction permit should be issued by the Respondent, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, for use by the Respondent, Alex Rutkowski, owner of Lot number 6, Block E, Carlton Terrace Subdivision First Addition, in Clearwater, Florida. Whether the filling in of Lot number 6 and the construction of a septic tank will damage the residence of the Petitioner, Elinor Burger, on Lot number 5.Deny application for septic tank permit. Respondent didn't show compliance with rule requirements. Allow reapplication if change in circumstances.

Barbara Ann Dell McPherson