Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Daniel H Thompson
Daniel H Thompson
Visitors: 76
0
Bar #195101(FL)     License for 50 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Daniel H Thompson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

07-003543PL  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs PATRICK ERIK NADELHOFFER  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 01, 2007
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, as amended at hearing, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Aggravated stalking, the crime to which Respondent pled guilty, is a felony involving moral turpitude. Accordingly, by having entered plea, Respondent violated Sections 626.611(14) and 626.621(8), Florida Statutes. Recommend a 3-month license suspension.
03-002872RP  MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION COMMISSION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 2003
Whether Proposed Rule 62-302.540, as formally noticed for adoption by the Department of Environmental Protection on July 18, 2003, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?Respondent`s proposed rule, "water quality standards for phosphorus within the Everglades Protection Area," is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
03-002873RP  FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION COMMISSION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 2003
Whether Proposed Rule 62-302.540, as formally noticed for adoption by the Department of Environmental Protection on July 18, 2003, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?Respondent`s proposed rule, "water quality standards for phosphorus within the Everglades Protection area," is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
03-002884RP  SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 2003
Whether Proposed Rule 62-302.540, as formally noticed for adoption by the Department of Environmental Protection on July 18, 2003, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?Respondent`s proposed rule, "water quality standards for phosphorus within the Everglades Protection area," is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
01-004026RU  ANGELO`S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD. vs SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 19, 2001
Whether Respondent's statements as set forth in the First Amended Petition to Determine Validity of Agency Statements Defined as Rules are rules as defined in Section 120.52(15), Florida Statutes, which have not been promulgated as required by Section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes.Agency statements concerning reliance on FEMA flood maps for establishing floodway and alternatively requiring applicants to obtain map amendment from FEMA before agency will accept alternative boundaries are rules as defined by Section 120.52(15), F.S.
01-004383RX  ANGELO`S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD. vs SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 09, 2001
Whether Rules 40B-1.702(4); 40B-4.1020(12) and (30); 40B-4.1030; 40B-4.1040(1)(b) and (c); 40B-4.2030(4); 40B-4.3000(1)(a); 40B-4.3010; 40B-4.3020; 40B-4.3030; 40B- 4.3040; and 40B-400.103(1)(h), Florida Administrative Code, of the Suwannee River Water Management District, are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority for reasons described in the Second Amended Petition to Determine Validity of Rules.Water Management District`s existing rules governing "works of district" do not constitute invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Petition is dismissed; Respondent`s request for attorney`s fees is denied.
00-003520BID  LAUDERDALE MARKET PLACE INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 2000
Whether the decision to reject all bids for Lease No. 800:0187 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent under the provisions of Section 120.57(3), Florida Statutes, or violates the terms of the Request for Proposal.Agency`s inability to provide facts or logic to justify rejection of all bids is arbitrary and violates term of Request for Proposals requiring "strong justification" to reject all bids.
00-003522BID  SUNRISE POINT I, LTD. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 2000
Whether the decision to reject all bids for Lease No. 800:0187 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent under the provisions of Section 120.57(3), Florida Statutes, or violates the terms of the Request for Proposal.Agency`s inability to provide facts or logic to justify rejection of all bids is arbitrary and violates term of Request for Proposals requiring "strong justification" to reject all bids.
96-002365BID  KNAUS SYSTEMS, INC. OF FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 17, 1996
Did Respondent Department of Labor and Employment Security (Department) properly reject the response submitted to the Department's Request For Proposal No. RFP 96-033-VA, For Computer Hardware and Related Equipment Maintenance Including Operating Software (RFP) by Petitioner Knaus Systems, Inc. (Knaus)? Did the Department provide Knaus with a clear point of entry to challenge the Department's decision, and, if so, did Knaus timely file its notice of protest or formal written protest?Although Petitioner didn't file protest within time under 120.53(5), protest was timely. However, cost proposal was not filed timely/considered as minor irregularity

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer