Miami-Dade FL Administrative law, Appeals and Aviation Lawye -- eLawyers

3:01-cv-00452 PACE v. PLATT (2002)

District Court, N.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 12, 2002 Citations: 228 F. Supp. 2d 1332

228 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (2002) Don H. PACE and Bonnie L. Pace, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Leonard PLATT, Joan E. Klar, Timothy J. Lee, Henry O. Lamar, Jr., Jane and John Does 1-500, and the Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. No. 3:01-CV-452/LAC. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. August 12, 2002. *1333 Don H. Pace, Sedona, AZ, Pro se. Bonnie L. Pace, Panama City Beach, FL, Pro se. Wendy K. Vann, U.S. Department of Jus..

13-002396 STEPHEN J. GONOT vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 25, 2013

Whether Petitioner has forfeited his rights and benefits under the Florida Retirement System (FRS), pursuant to sections 112.3173 and 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes, because of his conviction for official misconduct, a third degree felony under section 838.022(1), Florida Statutes.Petitioner forfeited his rights and benefits under the FRS pursuant to sections 112.3173 and 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes, because he was convicted of official misconduct, a third degree felony, in violation of section 838.022(1), Florida Statutes.

08-006353RX DANIEL METSCH vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 2008

The issue in this case is whether paragraphs (2)(a) and (5), of Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-100.004, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority because these paragraphs of the Rule enlarge, modify, or contravene the law implemented and are arbitrary and capricious.Petitioner failed to prove that Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-100.004(2)(a) and (5) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. The Rule is consisent with the law implemented and is not arbitrary or capricious.

09-003523 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs WEST BROWARD REFERRAL AND NURSES AGENCY, INC. (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 29, 2009

The issue for determination is whether Petitioner should impose a fine upon Respondent as set forth by the Notice of Intent to Impose Fine dated March 9, 2009.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that Respondent failed to "submit" the first quarterly report by e-mail. Recommend dismissal of notice of intent to impose fine.

06-001075 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs CEDRIC MITCHELL (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 2006

The issue is whether the Respondent, Cedric Mitchell (Respondent), committed the violations alleged and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent did not complete the academic work to achieve credits for certification. Recommend dismissal.

06-005029MPI AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs POLARIS PHARMACY CORPORATION, D/B/A LIMA`S PHARMACY (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 12, 2006

Whether Medicaid overpayments were made to Respondent and, if so, in what amount. Whether Respondent should be fined $5,000.00 for failing to document that it had available sufficient quantities of product to support its Medicaid billings.Petitioner met its burden of proving that Respondent received $198,332.78 in Medicaid overpayments by presenting a Final Agency Audit Report and supporting audit work papers.

03-000773MPI R & R MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003

Whether Petitioner received Medicaid overpayments and, if so, the total amount of the overpayments.Evidence at hearing was sufficient to establish Agency was entitled to refund of overpayments.

00-001933 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs OTTO A. VILLAMIZAR (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 08, 2000

Whether Respondent committed the offense set forth in the Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, what action should be taken.Respondent pled guilty and was convicted of a crime directly relating to the practice of nursing. Recommend reprimand, two-year suspension stayed, probation, administrative fine, and cost of investigation.

02-000821PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs BARBARA GONZALEZ (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2002

The issue is whether Respondent has been convicted of a crime directly related to the practice of nursing, in violation of Section 464.018(1)(c), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Recommended reprimand, five years` probation, $10,000 fine, and costs for nurse`s conviction for Medicare fraud. Nurse had cooperated with prosecution of organizers of the fraud.

95-005937BID SILVER EXPRESS COMPANY vs MIAMI-DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 07, 1995

Whether Miami-Dade Community College (hereinafter referred to as the "College") should sustain Petitioner's challenge to the Evaluation Committee's recommendation to award the contract advertised in Request for Proposal 956-34 ("Aviation Program Flight Training Provider, Kendall-Tamiami Executive Airport, Homestead Campus") to Intervenor, as the proposer submitting the proposal considered to be "in the best interest of the College?"Third ranked proposer did not have standing to protest recommendation of contract award on ground that recommended proposal not responsive.

Lawrence Richard Metsch