Miami-Dade FL Civil rights, Employment and labor and General -- eLawyers

Leslie Phyllis Holland

Visitors: 48

Bar #510688(FL) License for 39 years; Member in Good Standing

North Miami Beach FL

Are you Leslie Phyllis Holland? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 29 U.S.C 623, 42 U.S.C 2000

CFR: 29 CFR 1601.70

Florida Laws: 1001.32, 1001.42, 1012.23, 1012.33, 1012.53, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 20.15, 447.203, 447.209, 509.092, 760.01, 760.02, 760.10, 760.11, 95.051

Florida Administrative Code: 6B-4.009

12-003972TTS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs PAMELA PRUDENT (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 12, 2012

Whether just cause exists to suspend Ms. Prudent without pay and dismiss her from employment with the Miami-Dade County School Board.School Board established just cause for termination based on misconduct in office and violation of School Board Code of Ethics.

08-002168 DAMACIO GREEN vs MIAMI DADE COUNTY (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 05, 2008

Whether Respondent committed the unlawful employment practices alleged in the employment discrimination complaint Petitioner filed with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) and, if so, what relief should Petitioner be granted.Complaint of sexual harassment and retaliation should be dismissed where evidence showed that complainant's sexual relationship with supervisor was a consensual one that he had initiated and that he had made no pre-termination claim of sexual harassment

03-004041 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs DANIEL J. EPSTEIN (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 03, 2003

Whether the Respondent's employment as a teacher with the Petitioner should be terminated.Respondent downloaded pornographic videos on classroom computer when students were present, then viewed them and masturbated in his classroom during school hours when students were not present. Recommend Respondent be dismissed from employment.

03-000708PL CHARLIE CRIST, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs JOE L. COLLADO (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 27, 2003

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Joseph L. Collado, committed the offenses alleged in an Administrative Complaint issued by Petitioner, and dated December 17, 2002, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Educational Practices Commission failed to prove letter criticizing school administration violated principles of professional conduct or constituted gross immorality or act of moral turpitude.

01-004247 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs HENRY T. WOJCICKI (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 2001

Whether Respondent engaged in the conduct alleged in the Notice of Specific Charges, as amended. If so, what action should be taken against Respondent.Just cause existed to dismiss professional service contract teacher who was guilty of using unauthorized physical force against students.

92-001698 ALBERT HARRIS vs SCHOOL BOARD OF BAY COUNTY, JACK SIMONSON, AND CAROL LOVE (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 17, 1992

The ultimate issue is whether the Respondents engaged in an unlawful employment practice by discriminating against the Petitioners on account of race.Petitioners' unsatisfactory evaluations based on valid, non-discriminatory reasons, not on racial discrimination. Failure to establish prima facie case

92-006334 CHARLES JACKSON vs TALLAHASSEE TOYOTA, INC., D/B/A TEAM TOYOTA (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 26, 1992

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Petitioner was terminated from his employment with the Respondent because of his race, in alleged violation of Sections 760.01-760.10, Florida Statutes (1991).Petitioner did not show PF case of discrim. because not qualified; replace- ment more qualified. Poor performance valid business reason for discharge.

92-006043 TONI J. MASON vs SCHOOL BOARD OF LEON COUNTY AND RUTH S. MITCHELL (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 1992

Is the Petitioner handicapped? Was the Petitioner capable of performing her duties satisfactorily? Did Respondent take adverse personnel actions against the Respondent? Were the adverse personnel actions which were taken against the Petitioner based upon her disability? Did the Respondent have a legitimate nondiscriminatory basis for taking the adverse actions against Petitioner? Were the reasons articulated by the Respondent pretextual? Did the Respondent provide reasonable accommodations for the Petitioner? To what relief is the Petitioner entitled if she prevails? Are the Petitioner's rights limited by her status as a non-tenured employee on annual contract status? Is the Petitioner entitled to costs and reasonable attorneys fees?Employer discriminated against employee by not providing reasonable accomodation. Employee failed to mitigate damages by accepting offer job.

90-004184 BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs BURTON A. CASWELL (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1990

Whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Petitioner for Formal Proceedings and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Employment of male employee who engaged in verbal and physical misconduct with female co-workers should be terminated.

88-006352 BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs. JOHN EVANS (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 06, 1990

The ultimate issues for determination at the formal hearing were whether Petitioner abandoned his position as a Junior ROTC instructor or whether Petitioner was improperly suspended or terminated. Ancillary issues were raised by Petitioner and made a part of this proceeding pursuant to the Petition for Administrative Hearing, the Amended Petition for Administrative Hearing, and the Order Denying Motions In Limine and For Attorney's Fees entered on October 10, 1989. 1/ROTC instructor entitled to formal hearing under statute law even though decertified by Air Force. Air Force certified hearing isn't formal hearing required under statute law.