welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Mary Ellen Winkler
Mary Ellen Winkler
Mary Ellen Winkler
Visitors: 61
0
Bar #153303(FL)     License for 27 years; Member in Good Standing
Palatka FL

Are you Mary Ellen Winkler? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.541, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 180.22, 27.40, 373.016, 373.019, 373.036, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.044, 373.069, 373.079, 373.114, 373.116, 373.171, 373.175, 373.203, 373.217, 373.223, 373.2235, 373.227, 373.229, 373.233, 373.236, 373.239, 373.243, 373.246, 373.249, 373.406, 373.413, 373.4131, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.709, 39.01, 403.067, 403.087, 403.412, 403.927, 57.105, 6.01, 7.38, 7.46, 704.06, 8.031

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.108, 28-106.217, 40C-2.101, 40C-2.301, 40C-2.331, 40C-44.065, 40C-44.066, 40C-8.031, 62-302.300, 62-330.050, 62-330.301, 62-4.240, 62-4.242, 62-40.473

17-000119  ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, FLORIDA DEFENDERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT, SILVER SPRINGS ALLIANCE, AND ALICE GARDINER vs SLEEPY CREEK LANDS, LLC AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 2017
The issue to be determined is whether Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) No. 2-083-91926-4 should be authorized as proposed in the December 12, 2016, Consumptive Use Technical Staff Report (TSR) issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District.Petitioners failed to prove that the standards for issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit modification were not met. Thus, the permit modification should be issued.
14-002608  SIERRA CLUB, INC., AND ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, INC. vs SLEEPY CREEK LANDS, LLC AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Consumptive Use Permit No. 2-083-91926-3, and Environmental Resource Permit No. IND-083-130588-4 should be issued as proposed in the respective proposed agency actions issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District.Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving the case in opposition to the issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit and Environmental Resource Permit for irrigation in support of a grass-fed cattle ranch. Thus, the permits should be issued.
14-002609  KAREN AHLERS AND JERI BALDWIN vs SLEEPY CREEK LANDS, LLC AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Consumptive Use Permit No. 2-083-91926-3, and Environmental Resource Permit No. IND-083-130588-4 should be issued as proposed in the respective proposed agency actions issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District.Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving the case in opposition to the issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit and Environmental Resource Permit for irrigation in support of a grass-fed cattle ranch. Thus, the permits should be issued.
14-002610  KAREN AHLERS AND JERI BALDWIN vs SLEEPY CREEK LANDS, LLC AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Consumptive Use Permit No. 2-083-91926-3, and Environmental Resource Permit No. IND-083-130588-4 should be issued as proposed in the respective proposed agency actions issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District.Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving the case in opposition to the issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit and Environmental Resource Permit for irrigation in support of a grass-fed cattle ranch. Thus, the permits should be issued.
05-000344  MIAMI CORPORATION AND VERGIE CLARK vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 18, 2007
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
05-002607  VERGIE CLARK vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 20, 2005
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
05-002940  MIAMI CORPORATION vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2005
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
05-000130  SIERRA CLUB, INC. vs FCC PARTNERS LP, LTD, PLAZA PARTNERS GROUP LP, LTD, PYRAMID PARTNERS GROUP LP, LTD AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2005
The ultimate legal and factual issue in this matter is whether FCC Partners LP, LTD, et al. (collectively FCC) has provided the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) with reasonable assurances that the activities it proposes to conduct for construction and operation of a surface water management system for a commercial and residential project and alteration of two surface water management systems to implement a wetland mitigation plan pursuant to Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Application No. 4-031-17237-4 (the Permit), meet the conditions for issuance of permits established in Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302 and the District’s Applicant’s Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Water (A.H.).The applicant provided reasonable assurances that its project complies with the applicable provisions of Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and the Applicant`s Handbook.
05-000131  ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, INC. vs FCC PARTNERS LP, LTD, PLAZA PARTNERS GROUP LP, LTD, PYRAMID PARTNERS GROUP LP, LTD AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2005
The ultimate legal and factual issue in this matter is whether FCC Partners LP, LTD, et al. (collectively FCC) has provided the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) with reasonable assurances that the activities it proposes to conduct for construction and operation of a surface water management system for a commercial and residential project and alteration of two surface water management systems to implement a wetland mitigation plan pursuant to Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Application No. 4-031-17237-4 (the Permit), meet the conditions for issuance of permits established in Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302 and the District’s Applicant’s Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Water (A.H.).The applicant provided reasonable assurances that its project complies with the applicable provisions of Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and the Applicant`s Handbook.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer