Leon FL Constitutional, Elder law and Environmental Law Lawy -- eLawyers

03-000059 MITCHELL`S GROCERY & SEAFOOD vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2003

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Department of Revenue (Department) has properly issued an assessment against Mitchell's Grocery and Seafood (Mitchell's) for additional sales and use tax, interest and penalty; local government infrastructure surtax, interest and penalty; and school capital outlay surtax, interest and penalty; purportedly due in connection with business operations of Mitchell's relating to underreported taxable sales.Petitioner failed to offer sufficient evidence that audit sample method was improper or that taxable sales ratio was arrived at improperly. Therefore, assessment was not shown to be incorrect since Petitioner taxpayer had agreed to allow sample method.

03-001249 CYCLE IVAN`S, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 2003

The issue is whether Petitioner owes additional sales and use tax, interest, and penalties, pursuant to a Notice of Proposed Assessment.Respondent proved factual and legal bases for assessment after a reduction of sales tax deficiency for service-only transactions.

02-000469 MY OIL COMPANY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 07, 2002

Whether the Department of Revenue's denial of Petitioner's application for a Florida fuel license should be upheld.Applicant failed to demonstrate its entitlement to fuel license; however, agency`s allegations of fraud in application process were unproven, and applicant should receive opportunity to cure defects in application.

99-001293 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs CARLOS MANUEL RODRIQUEZ (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 1999

Whether Respondent, a licensed insurance salesperson, committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Insurance salesperson is guilty of failing to file a change of address. Twisting allegations were not established by the requisite standard.

99-000852 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs JOSEPH ANTHONY ISABELLA (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 1999

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the offense set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Agent`s license was suspended for one year following conviction for passing worthless check.

98-001285 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs AMELIA KAY JACOBS (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 16, 1998

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Amelia Kay Jacobs, committed the offenses alleged in an Administrative Complaint entered by the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Florida on February 20, 1998.Respondent failed to disclose guilty plea to felony on application for nonresident agent`s license. Recommended six months suspension.

91-007634RP FLORIDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKERS` COMPENSATION SELF-INSURANCE FUND vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 1991

At issue in this proceeding is whether respondent's proposed rule 4- 136.007(2) constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Agency rule that would require the words assessable mutual in the name of such an insurance company exceed agency's grant of rulemaking authority

89-003940 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs BARBARA HELEN ASKEA (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 25, 1989

The issue in this case is whether the Respondent's life and health insurance license should be disciplined for the reasons set forth in the Administrative Complaint filed on June 15, 1989. That Complaint alleges that Respondent has violated certain provisions of the Florida Insurance Code. Specifically, Petitioner alleges Respondent has violated Section 626.611(7), Florida Statutes as a result of a demonstrated lack of fitness or trustworthiness to engage in the business of insurance, Section 626.611(14), Florida Statutes as a result of having been found guilty of, or having pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony in this state which involves moral turpitude and/or Section 626.621(8), Florida Statutes as a result of being guilty of, or having pleaded guilty, or nolo contendere to a felony in this state.Respondent pled guilty to grand theft; adjudication withheld and court expressed belief that respondent could continue in business; suspension rather than revocation recommended.

Robert Franklin Langford Jr.