Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Rodney Marcum Johnson
Rodney Marcum Johnson
Visitors: 38
0
Bar #472387(FL)     License for 39 years; Member in Good Standing
Pensacola FL

Are you Rodney Marcum Johnson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52120.569120.57381.0061381.0065381.0101489.553489.556760.02760.10838.021

Florida Administrative Code: 64E-6.00164E-6.00264E-6.022

09-006439  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs JOHN E. MCDANIEL, D/B/A SUPERIOR SEPTIC AND SEWER, INC.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 23, 2009
The issues, as framed by the Administrative Complaint, are twofold: Whether Respondent committed gross negligence, incompetence, or misconduct which caused monetary harm to a customer, in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rule 64E-6.022(1)(l)2; and Whether Respondent practiced fraud or deceit by making a misleading or untrue representation to a home purchaser, or the home purchaser's agents, incident to a loan application, in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rule 64E-6.022(1)(k).Respondent's septic tank inspection and allowing a non-licensed person to sign the certification demonstrated incompetence or misconduct, resulting in harm to a customer. Respondent's license should be suspended for six months and a $1,000 fine imposed.
07-005504  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs G.D. YON, JR., D/B/A YON SEPTIC TANK COMPANY  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 06, 2007
Whether Respondent’s license as a septic tank contractor should be disciplined.The evidence showed that Respondent threatened an inspector with bodily harm, blocked his path, and prevented him from closing truck lid when trying to leave was gross misconduct. Recommend a $500.00 fine with a 90-day suspension.
08-000839  EDNA M. RUBIN vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 19, 2008
: The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Petitioner was subjected to an unlawful employment practice by being allegedly retaliated against by termination from employment for purportedly making complaints concerning alleged discriminatory practices toward Hispanic employees.Petitioner failed to establish prima facie case for discrimination by retaliation. She failed to show she participated in statutorily protected activity and failed to show Respondent knew that the alleged discrimination occurred or she had complained.
03-004765  RONALD E. BURKETT vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 2003
Whether the Agency should register the Petitioner as a septic tank contractor?Petitioner`s application was deficient on its face and Respondent showed that Petitioner`s past violations supported its decision to deny him a septic tank contractor`s license.
00-003445  ADELE SELLERS vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2000
Whether Petitioner may be granted a variance from Rule 64E-6.001(4), Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 381.0065(4)(h)1., Florida Statutes.Twelve-month variance with provisos granted upon financial hardship. Test is whether perpetual use of the variance could, combined with all the other factors present, contribute to surface water degradation.
99-004875  STEPHEN C. METZLER vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 18, 1999
The issue to be resolved is whether Petitioner received more than one increase in pay in any twelve-month period for the category of added duties and responsibilities, Rule 60K-2.006, Florida Administrative Code.Petitioner showed the agency intended to give him an allowable pay raise; however, a clerical error was made which violated procedure. The collection of the money from Petitioner to correct the error is unwarranted; paper work should be corrected.
98-002560  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs TRAMMEL FOWLER  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 1998
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent installed a septic system without a permit; whether a permit was required for the installation; whether the installation was of inadequate size; whether the Respondent caused the disconnection of an existing system without a permit, and whether that system was improperly abandoned. A related issue is whether the proposed $1,500.00 fine should be imposed if the violations are proven or what, if any, fine is warranted.Although septic tank repair was done without permit, Department acquiesced at time inspected and approved it. Respondent who did not conceal it cannot be blame-worthy. The other two charges not supported by evidence. Recommended letter of warning.
99-002474  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs JOHN E. MCDANIEL, D/B/A SUPERIOR SEPTIC AND SEWER, INC.  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 1999
The issues to be resolved in the proceeding concern whether the Respondent, a licensed septic tank contractor, installed twelve septic tank systems at eleven locations in Bay and Walton Counties in which the required filters were removed, allegedly violating the various provisions of Chapter 381, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code, cited and discussed herein below and, if that is the case whether an administrative fine should be imposed.Agency established that Respondent committed the violations charged (as a septic tank contractor) by removing filters after final inspections. A fine of $3,300 should be imposed.
99-004945  STACY L. NORWOOD vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 29, 1999
The issue is whether Petitioner received a salary overpayment of $2,209.76 during 1998 and 1999, as alleged by Respondent.Two increases in base pay in the same category within a 12-month period is improper; State is authorized to seek recovery of salary overpayments from employee.
97-004599  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs WILLIE A. HARMON  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 09, 1997
The issue is whether Respondent should have his license suspended and an administrative fine imposed for allegedly committing fraud and deceit in the practice of contracting, providing septic tank contracting services without an operating permit, and submitting a fabricated building permit number to obtain a final inspection approval of a job.By failing to pump septic tank dry, licensee committed fraud and deceit on consumer.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer