Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Trevor S Suter
Trevor S Suter
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #17617(FL)     License for 19 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Trevor S Suter? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-006010FL  AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES vs RIVERO GROUP HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY RIVERO GROUP HOME NO. 6, INC.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 12, 2019
Whether Respondent's renewal facilities licensure application for a group home contained a falsified fire inspection report, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty?APD failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Rivero knowingly submitted a false fire inspection report. Recommend granting renewal license application.
5D10-872  Fredrick v. State  (2011)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 18, 2011 Citations: 53 So. 3d 236
53 So. 3d 236 (2011) FREDRICK v. STATE. No. 5D10-872. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 18, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
19-001812FL  AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES vs MEADOWVIEW PROGRESSIVE CARE CORPORATION GROUP HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY MEADOWVIEW PROGRESSIVE CARE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2019
The issues are whether, pursuant to section 393.0673(1), Florida Statutes (2018), Respondent, which holds a license to operate a group home facility, was identified in a verified report by the Department of Children and Families (DCF) as the perpetrator of exploitation of a vulnerable adult, failed to disclose on a renewal application a perpetrator of "the . . . abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult" (Maltreatment),1 and allowed a new employee to begin working at the group home before completing all of the background screening requirements; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed against Respondent's license.Petitioner failed to prove by clear and convicing evidence that verified report of maltreatment named licensee as perpetrator, that licensee lied on renewal application, or that licensee employed an unscreened person.
19-004018FL  AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES vs FIVE STAR GROUP HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY FIVE STAR GROUP HOME, INC.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 29, 2019
Did Petitioner, Agency for Persons with Disabilities (APD), prove by clear and convincing evidence that the Department of Children and Families (Department) verified that Respondent, Five Star Group Home, owned and operated by Five Star Group Home, Inc. (Five Star), was responsible for the abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult? If so, does the verified finding support revocation of Five Star's license under the authority of section 393.0673(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2019) 1/?Evidence proved that DCF made verified finding of abuse against group home owner/operator. Verified finding supported revoking license. Whether the finding was correct is not relevant under the statute.
19-003968EXE  SHATARA JOHNSON vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioner should be granted an exemption from disqualification from holding a position of trust in accordance with the process provided in section 435.07, Florida Statutes.Petitioner did not establish rehabilitation. Recommend denial of exemption from a position of trust.
18-006496FL  LOVING TOUCH "A BRIGHTER FUTURE" HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY ZULIA BRENOVIL, LOVING TOUCH ADULT FAMILY CARE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2018
Whether Petitioners' applications to license their group home facilities should have been approved by Respondent, Agency for Persons with Disabilities ("APD" or "Respondent").Utilizing the provisions of chapter 393.0673, Florida Statutes, the preponderance of the evidence showed that the agency properly denied Petitioners' initial applications for licensure.
18-006497FL  LOVING TOUCH "DYNAMIC" HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY ZULIA BRENOVIL, LOVING TOUCH ADULT FAMILY CARE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2018
Whether Petitioners' applications to license their group home facilities should have been approved by Respondent, Agency for Persons with Disabilities ("APD" or "Respondent").Petitioners' license application should be denied by the agency.
19-000308EXE  NANCY JOSEPH vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Whether Petitioner has demonstrated rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence; and, if so, whether Respondent's intended action to deny Petitioner's request for an exemption from disqualification constitutes an abuse of discretion.Rehabilitation was not established by clear and convincing evidence. Accordingly, Petitioner was not entitled to exemption from disqualification.
18-002106FL  AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES vs ADAMS GROUP HOME, INC., AND JOYCE ADAMS  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Whether Respondents Adams Group Home, Inc., and Joyce Adams' ("Respondents") group home licensure renewal applications should be denied.DCF's verified findings of abuse, neglect, or exploitation involving Ms. Adams in 2014 and 2015, and failure to obtain written consents for video monitoring in common areas did not warrant denial of Respondents' 2018 renewal license applications.
18-000658FL  AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES vs ECO HOMES AND HEALTH SERVICES, GROUP HOME OWNED AND OPERATED BY ECO HOME AND HEALTH SERVICES, LLC  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 09, 2018
Whether Respondent, ECO Home and Health Services Group Home, owned and operated by ECO Home and Health Services, LLC (“Respondent” or “ECO Home”), committed the violations of the applicable statutes and rules alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what is the appropriate sanction.The Agency failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the group home operator pepper sprayed a resident of the home on either occasion alleged in the Administrative Complaint.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer