Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs ANDY RODRIGUEZ, 04-003424PL (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida Sep. 22, 2004 Number: 04-003424PL Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 1
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs KENNETH JEFFREY BERMAN, 04-002871PL (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Fort Lauderdale, Florida Aug. 16, 2004 Number: 04-002871PL Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 2
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs PATRICIA MARIE LORELLO, 00-001943 (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:St. Petersburg, Florida May 09, 2000 Number: 00-001943 Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 3
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs NINA MICHELLE CROASMUN-ROBERTS, 01-004766PL (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Fort Myers, Florida Dec. 10, 2001 Number: 01-004766PL Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 4
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs JEFFREY CARL PELLET, 10-008909PL (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Fort Lauderdale, Florida Sep. 03, 2010 Number: 10-008909PL Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 5
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs MANUEL CHAMIZO, JR., 00-001895 (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida May 03, 2000 Number: 00-001895 Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 6
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs GLENN KENNETH FANNIN, JR., 08-003079PL (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:West Palm Beach, Florida Jun. 24, 2008 Number: 08-003079PL Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 7
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs VINCENT BONDI, 02-003622PL (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Fort Lauderdale, Florida Sep. 19, 2002 Number: 02-003622PL Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 8
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs. CHARLES LEE ANDERSON, 86-001214 (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 86-001214 Latest Update: Sep. 10, 1986

Findings Of Fact Introduction At all times relevant hereto, respondent, Charles Lee Anderson, was licensed as a general lines insurance agent by petitioner, Department of Insurance and Treasurer. Respondent presently resides at 2291 Northwest 12th Court, Pompano Beach, Florida. He has been licensed by petitioner since 1968, and, prior to this proceeding, had no blemishes on his record. When the events herein occurred, Anderson was the president and director of Payless and Save Insurance Underwriters Corporation (Payless), an insurance agency located and doing business at 2401 Northwest 21st Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Anderson was also the general lines agent of record for the corporation. Count I In early January, 1984 Anderson was working from midnight until 8:00 a.m. as a security guard. Because of this, he hired one Mamie Baugh as an independent contractor to operate his insurance agency. Anderson authorized Baugh to sell policies and sign his name on insurance applications and other documents. Anderson would drop by his office two or three times a week to "check on (Baugh)" and "look at the paperwork." On or about January 3, 1984 Blanche Jones went to Payless to purchase an automobile insurance policy. She chose Payless because it was located just around the corner from her home in Fort Lauderdale, and was more convenient than her former insurance agent in Hallandale. Because Anderson was not present, Jones met with Baugh and discussed her insurance needs. Baugh filled out an application on behalf of Jones for automobile insurance with Industrial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (Industrial) in Hollywood, Florida. Anderson was a licensed agent with Industrial, and authorized to act as a brokering agent for that company. Baugh signed Anderson's name on the application as brokering agent. Jones then gave Baugh a check for $456 as payment for the policy and was given a receipt. In February Jones had not received her policy or any evidence that she was insured. Her husband decided to visit the Payless office and obtain an insurance identification card in the event they had an accident. He met with Anderson who promised to give him a card. The following day, Anderson went to Jones' house and dropped off a business card. 1/ While there, Jones told Anderson she had paid for a policy but had never received anything. Anderson promised to "check into the particulars." After not hearing from Anderson for two months, Jones' husband went to Payless' office and found it closed. Jones thereafter went to her old insurance agent in Hallandale, and then to Public Insurance Agency (Public) in Hollywood. Public was the managing general agent for Industrial, the insurance company with whom Jones thought she had a policy. Public had no record of having received Jones' application or the $456 premium paid to Anderson. It also had no record of Anderson having telephoned Public on its "application telephone", a procedure that Anderson should have followed in order to have a binder issued on the policy. Consequently, Public never issued a policy insuring Jones. In late 1985 Jones was reading a copy of the Hollywood Sun Tattler, a local newspaper, and noticed an article about Anderson, who was then running for chief of police in Dania. She contacted the reporter who wrote the story who in turn contacted Anderson. Respondent telephoned Jones the next day and promised to return her money. A week later (January 10, 1986) Jones received a $456 money order from Anderson. A representative of Public established that Anderson was given a copy of an underwriting guide which contained explicit instructions on how to bind coverage and fill out applications. Among other things, the guide required that Anderson, and not his surrogate, sign all applications. Therefore, he was not authorized to allow Baugh to sign in his stead. Count II On or about December 20, 1983 Joseph V. Baxter visited Payless for the purpose of purchasing insurance coverage on various rental properties he owned. Baxter met with Anderson who prepared six "Homeowners Application for Quotation Only" with International Bankers Insurance Company (IBIC). Baxter gave Anderson a check for $818 as payment for the coverage. Anderson later endorsed the check. On January 11, 1984 Baxter returned to Payless and made application for a seventh insurance policy on another rental property. He gave Anderson a $318 check which Anderson subsequently endorsed. At that time Baxter was given a certificate of insurance indicating coverage with Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company (GSFIC). Several months later Baxter received a telephone call from a representative of the lending institution which held the mortgages on his property. Baxter then instructed Anderson to contact the institution and certify that Baxter had coverage on his properties. Anderson telephoned the institution in Baxter's presence and told the representative that Baxter was insured. Sometime later Baxter was again contacted by the mortgagee concerning his insurance coverage. Baxter attempted to visit Anderson but found Payless had closed its offices and gone out of business. Baxter then filed a complaint with petitioner. He never received insurance policies from IBIC or GSFIC. On January 10, 1986 Anderson repaid Baxter $1,136, the amount received by Anderson some two years earlier. A representative of IBIC established that Anderson never remitted the premiums or mailed the six quotation forms to the home office. It was further established that although GSFIC quoted a rate for Anderson on Baxter's seventh piece of property, it never received the follow-up application or premium. Respondent's Case Respondent blamed the Jones mishap on Baugh, who he claimed may have misplaced the application and taken the money. According to Anderson, she now lives in California and was unable to attend the hearing. However, he had no explanation for failing to follow up on Baxter's applications. Anderson said he closed his business in February, 1984 after a series of break- ins at his office, and left a note on the door giving a telephone number where he could be reached. However, he made no effort to personally contact those persons who held policies. Anderson further stated that he was unaware of the Jones and Baxter complaints until contacted by the newspaper reporter and petitioner, and then promptly repaid all monies due.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that respondent be found guilty of the violations set forth in the Conclusions of Law portion of this order, and that his license and eligibility for licensure be REVOKED. DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of September, 1986, in Tallahassee, Florida. DONALD R. ALEXANDER Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904)488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 10th day of September, 1986.

Florida Laws (4) 120.57626.561626.611626.734
# 9
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs JOAN LORRAINE DRAGONE, 09-001209PL (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Lauderdale Lakes, Florida Mar. 06, 2009 Number: 09-001209PL Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2009

The Issue The issues in this case are whether Respondent, Joan Lorraine Dragone, committed the offenses alleged in an Amended Administrative Complaint, issued by Petitioner, the Department of Financial Services and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.

Findings Of Fact The Parties. Petitioner, the Department of Financial Services (hereinafter referred to as the "Department"), is the agency of the State of Florida charged with the responsibility for, among other things, the investigation and prosecution of complaints against individuals licensed to conduct insurance business in Florida. Ch. 626, Fla. Stat. Respondent Joan Lorraine Dragone is currently and was at the times relevant, licensed in Florida as a Health (2-40) and General Lines (Property & Casualty)(2-20) insurance agent. Ms. Dragone was first licensed in December 1992. Ms. Dragone’s license identification number is A071793. At all relevant times, Ms. Dragone operated and owned All Neighbors Discount Insurance, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “All Neighbors”). Ms. Dragone is and was the president and a director of All Neighbors. All Neighbors’ principal address is 7116 Stirling Road, Davie, Florida 33024. Ms. Dragone, who was first licensed by the Department in December 1992, has worked in the insurance business for approximately 23 years. Part of that time she worked with her sister, Nancy Rice, who also became a licensed insurance agent. Ms. Rice left All Neighbors in April 2004. Employment of Jose Corilloclla. Sometime in 1997, Jose Corilloclla, a native of Peru, was employed at All Neighbors. Mr. Corilloclla, who was an illegal alien at the time, was paid weekly in cash at an hourly rate of $6.00. Although Ms. Dragone denied knowledge of Mr. Corilloclla’s status and employment, it is inferred that she had knowledge that he was not legally in the United States. Initially, Mr. Corilloclla was employed as a file clerk and to do odd jobs for All Neighbors. Mr. Corilloclla also acted as an interpreter of Spanish-speaking customers for All Neighbors. After Ms. Rice’s departure in April 2004, Mr. Corilloclla was employed full-time at All Neighbors until his departure in 2005. Ms. Dragone was his only supervisor during this time. While directly under Ms. Dragone’s supervision, Mr. Corilloclla usually arrived at the office at about 10:00 a.m. and departed at about 6:00 p.m. On most days, Ms. Dragone began work at approximately 11:00 to 11:30 a.m. On occasion, Ms. Dragone did not arrive until noon. Ms. Dragone also, on occasion, would leave the office for an hour or more during the afternoon. On all of these occasions, Mr. Corilloclla was left alone, unsupervised, at All Neighbors. From at least April 2004 until his departure, Mr. Corilloclla’s duties at All Neighbors increased dramatically. Mr. Corilloclla answered the telephone and met with customers, describing the benefits of insurance coverage, giving interpretations of insurance coverage and/or policies, describing the terms of insurance coverage, including premiums, inviting customers to contract for insurance, quoting premiums and binding coverage, recommending insurance options, and completing applications. Mr. Corilloclla also conducted vehicle inspections. Mr. Corilloclla generally held himself out to be an insurance agent. At some time after April 2004, Ms. Dragone encouraged Mr. Corilloclla to obtain an insurance license. While Mr. Corilloclla began the process of obtaining a license, completing approximately eight of a 40-hour insurance agent course, he did not complete the process. As the agent in charge, Ms. Dragone agreed to supervise Mr. Corilloclla during the process of obtaining his license. Ms. Dragone’s testimony that Mr. Corilloclla’s activities after April 2004 were limited to those for which she fully supervised him was not credible. Mr. Corilloclla, having been with All Neighbors since 1997, had learned how the business operated and Ms. Dragone simply allowed him to operate as if he were already an insurance agent, essentially unsupervised. Suresh Parmanand’s Automobile Insurance Purchase. In 2002, Suresh Parmanand (hereinafter referred to as “Suresh”), a resident of New York, purchased a 2002 Mercedes- Benz S430 (hereinafter referred to as the “Vehicle”) from somewhere in Virginia (Suresh was unable to recall where exactly in Virginia the purchase took place). The Vehicle was a used one. Suresh decided to insure the Vehicle in Florida, at least in part, because of lower insurance rates than he could obtain in New York. Utilizing his brother’s name, Hemchand Parmanand (hereinafter referred to as “Hemchand”), and his brother’s Florida address, Suresh obtained insurance for the Vehicle through All Neighbors. Suresh insured the Vehicle by telephone conversations with Mr. Corilloclla, who also obtained a Florida title in the name of Hemcharnd for the Vehicle for Suresh. After speaking with Mr. Corilloclla by telephone about insuring the Vehicle, Mr. Corilloclla, who was fully aware that the vehicle was located in New York, had never been in Florida, and would not be located in Florida, completed an application for insurance from Gainsco Insurance Group (hereinafter referred to as “Gainsco”). Mr. Corilloclla filled out a Gainsco application for insurance on the Vehicle, signing it with Hemchand’s name as applicant, Ms. Dragone’s name as agent, and binding the insurance effective December 18, 2004. While an explanation as to why it took approximately two years to bind the coverage was given, like many issues surrounding Suresh’s questionable automobile insurance dealings, that explanation was not convincing enough on which to make a finding. Mr. Corilloclla also completed a Vehicle Pre-insurance Inspection Form, signing Hemchand’s name and Ms. Dragone’s name. No inspection was ever conducted by Mr. Corilloclla or Ms. Dragone. Suresh paid for the insurance with three separate, sequentially numbered checks dated the same day and all made payable to Mr. Corilloclla. Mr. Corilloclla deposited those checks into his personal bank account, keeping part of the payments (approximately $200.00) for himself, and placed the premium with the application for insurance at All Neighbors. The application and premium were processed by Ms. Dragone. While the evidence failed to prove clearly and convincingly that Ms. Dragone was fully aware of the nature of this transaction, she was aware that Mr. Corilloclla had obtained the insurance and had signed the documentation on her behalf. Ms. Dragone, at the time of the foregoing transaction, had an agency agreement with National Specialty Lines, the Managing General Agent subsidiary of Gainsco. Pursuant to that agreement, Ms. Dragone was appointed and authorized to solicit and submit applications for insurance, and to deliver policies and binders consistent with the insurance company’s underwriting guidelines. Those guidelines limited the binding of coverage to Ms. Dragone and required that she conduct the vehicle inspection and complete and sign the inspection form. Ms. Dragone did not comply with either of these requirements. Ultimately, the Vehicle was allegedly involved in an accident for which Suresh submitted an insurance claim. As a result of the claim, an investigation was begun by Gainsco Insurance Group which led to the discovery that the Vehicle had been fraudulently insured.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered by the Department finding that Joan Lorraine Dragone violated the provisions of Chapter 626, Florida Statutes, described more fully in this Recommended Order; dismissing all other charges; and suspending her license and appointment for a period of between 18 and 24 months. DONE AND ENTERED this 21st day of August, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. LARRY J. SARTIN Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this day 21st day of August, 2009. COPIES FURNISHED: David J. Busch, Senior Attorney Division of Legal Services Department of Financial Services 612 Larson Building 200 East Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0333 Joan Lorraine Dragone 3100 Southwest 20 Court Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312 Tracey Beal, Agency Clerk Department of Financial Services 200 East Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0390 Honorable Alex Sink Chief Financial Officer Department of Financial Services The Capitol, Plaza Level 11 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0300 Benjamin Diamond, General Counsel Department of Financial Services The Capitol, Plaza Level 11 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0307

Florida Laws (10) 120.569120.57626.015626.0428626.112626.611626.621626.7315626.734626.9911 Florida Administrative Code (1) 69B-222.060
# 10

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer