In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark 8-1 decision in Pereira v Sessions holding that a Notice to Appear (NTA) in Immigration Court which does not state the date and time of the hearing is a defective Notice to Appear and does not give the Immigration Court jurisdiction over a case.
The government has failed to include the date and time in over 90% of the NTAs that it has issued over the past 20 years. Thus, the Pereira decision could void hundreds of thousands of existing and completed removal proceedings.
This would be a disaster for an Administration which is intent on deporting as many people as possible.
Unfair Termination - Instructor at Vocational Program.
Hired 01/07. On 6/7/07, I called the director of ed, for her urgent issue. She said that after reviewing my file, i am no longer eligible to teach since I don't have 2yrs exp - effective immediately. They hired me with complete knowledge that i don't have much experience - and just decided to let me go. In fact, I'm not positive if i've been laid off, fired or suspended. No documentation, just a phone conversation. They didn't offer my office hours. She said until I show documentation that I have 2 years under my belt, I can't do anything. I spoke w/ supervisor and he said that they had a sox audit 2 weeks ago and they've known of my situation. They did not give me any prior notice. This call was 4 hours before my scheduled class shift.
rental leasing
On 9 dec 2006 i was served with papers to appear in court 9 jan 2007 the plaintiff being my landlord file to have me evicted for non payment of rent.At the jan 9th 2007 court date i request 1 week from that date to vacate the apt and return it to rentable condition as per the judge.The second hearing is to acces damages can my security deposit be used for payments of the back rent in dispute.I have receipts and document showing that i do not owe
complaint - summons
My neighbors daughter who is 16 years old who hangs out at the mall with the other young adults aging from 15 – 25 often.
Apparently her and a 23 year old male that’s works and hangs out with that crowd is supposedly to have had an incident were the 16 year girl parents has now filed a complaint summons against the 23 year old that reads, “within the jurisdiction of this court, with purpose to harass another, engage in a course of alarming conduct with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy such other person, specifically by grabbing the complainants the 16 year old girl in a bear hug squeezing and kissing her face.
The 23 year did not know this girl was 16; she told him she was 21.
He also said he did not touch her and she said he did; she said she had witnesses and so did he.
He is summoned to appear before the court to answer the complaint, if he fails to appear on the date a warrant may be issued for his arrest.
Should this young man get him a lawyer?
What will happen to him?
Will they arrest him?
He has neither record nor any parking/tickets or warrants.
He’s not on drugs and works every day.
Please advise if you can.