Leon FL Appeals, Child support and Criminal defense Lawyers -- eLawyers

18-000402PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JORGE I. NAVARRO (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2018

17-005238RU CHARLES F. MCCLELLAN AND NATASHA NEMETH vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2017

Whether Florida Administrative Code Rules 61D-6.007 and/or 61D-6.012 constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Florida Administrative Code Rules 61D-6.007 and 61D-6.012 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

17-003727 SUMMER JAI-ALAI PARTNERSHIP vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 28, 2017

The issue is whether Petitioner's Notice of Intent to Withdraw License should be granted or dismissed.Agency may not withdraw operating license for mistake but must revoke it on statutory ground. Attempt to restrict holder of converted permit under s. 550.0745 from using s. 550.475 to relocate summer jai-alai to different county is unadopted rule.

17-001533PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs ROBERT G. DAWSON (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 2017

Whether Respondent raced an animal that was impermissibly medicated or determined to have a prohibited substance present, in violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what sanction is appropriate.Petitioner proved 18 counts of racing a greyhound with a drug. Separate counts for drugs that were possibly metabolites of primary drug constituted a mitigating factor.

16-003010 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs RAHAF FOOD SERVICE, INC., D/B/A HOOK FISH AND CHICKEN (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2016

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, dated January 25, 2016; and, if so, what penalty is warranted.The Division proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed the food safety violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint.

16-002758 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CASA MEXICANA RESTAURANT, INC., D/B/A CASA MEXICANA RESTAURANT, INC. (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 2016

Whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint filed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants (Petitioner), against Casa Mexicana Restaurant, Inc., d/b/a Casa Mexicana Restaurant, Inc. (Respondent), are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Code violations support upward deviation of penalty.

16-001603 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs BENITEL EDDIE JOEL PEREZ, D/B/A LOS GORDITOS NO. 2 (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 2016

The issues in this matter are whether Respondent was out of compliance with the food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes (2016),1/ and the implementing administrative rules of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants; and, if so, what disciplinary action is appropriate.Respondent's violation of food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and implementing rules warrants an administrative fine.

15-007347 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC., D/B/A LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC. (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2015

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the administrative complaints dated July 8, 2015, and September 30, 2015; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that an administrative penalty of $2,150.00 and recoupment of investigative costs were warranted for health and safety violations found at the Respondent's restaurant.

15-007350 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC., D/B/A LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC. (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2015

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the administrative complaints dated July 8, 2015, and September 30, 2015; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that an administrative penalty of $2,150.00 and recoupment of investigative costs were warranted for health and safety violations found at the Respondent's restaurant.

16-001170 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs TILLIE'S TWISTEE TREAT, INC., D/B/A TILLIE'S TWISTEE TREAT (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2016

The issue in this case is whether the allegations of the Amended Administrative Complaint filed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants (Petitioner), against Tillie’s Twistee Treat, Inc., d/b/a Tillie’s Twistee Treat (Respondent) are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Ice cream temps exceeded food code maximums and posed threat of food-borne illness to consumers.

Charles LaRay Dewrell Jr.