welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Jodi C Page
Jodi C Page
Jodi C Page
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #174629(FL)     License for 25 years; Member in Good Standing
Miami FL

Are you Jodi C Page? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 42 CFR 483, 42 CFR 483.10, 42 CFR 483.10, 42 CFR 483.10, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.13, 42 CFR 483.20, 42 CFR 483.20, 42 CFR 483.20, 42 CFR 483.20, 42 CFR 483.20, 42 CFR 483.20, 42 CFR 483.20, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.25

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 154.213, 159.30, 394.467, 400.022, 400.023, 400.111, 400.121, 400.141, 400.179, 400.23, 400.235, 90.803

2D11-2128  Harris v. State  (2011)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 11, 2011 Citations: 71 So. 3d 123
71 So. 3d 123 (2011) HARRIS v. STATE. No. 2D11-2128. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 11, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Habeas Corpus denied.
02-000692  BEVERLY HEALTHCARE OF NORTH OKALOOSA vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 15, 2002
Whether Beverly Health Care of North Okaloosa violated certain regulations at the time of two surveys conducted on July 16 and November 29, 2001, so as to justify the Agency for Health Care Administration's decision to issue Beverly Health Care of North Okaloosa Conditional licenses and administrative fines.Agency did not demonstrate Class II violations by nursing home. Change in licensure status inappropriate. Administrative Complaint dismissed.
02-001098  BEVERLY HEALTHCARE OF NORTH OKALOOSA vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 2002
Whether Beverly Health Care of North Okaloosa violated certain regulations at the time of two surveys conducted on July 16 and November 29, 2001, so as to justify the Agency for Health Care Administration's decision to issue Beverly Health Care of North Okaloosa Conditional licenses and administrative fines.Agency did not demonstrate Class II violations by nursing home. Change in licensure status inappropriate. Administrative Complaint dismissed.
02-004161  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSONARY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, INC., D/B/A SHELL POINT NURSING PAVILION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 2002
DOAH Case No. 02-4161: Whether Respondent's licensure status should be reduced from standard to conditional. DOAH Case No. 02-4160: Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated August 29, 2002, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Agency established by clear and convincing evidence that the cited deficiency occurred, as Shell Point knew of resident`s aggressive behavior. Recommend maintaining conditional licensure status and imposing a fine of $2,500.
02-004160  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSONARY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, INC., D/B/A SHELL POINT NURSING PAVILION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 2002
DOAH Case No. 02-4161: Whether Respondent's licensure status should be reduced from standard to conditional. DOAH Case No. 02-4160: Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated August 29, 2002, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Agency established by clear and convincing evidence that the cited deficiency occurred, as Shell Point knew of resident`s aggressive behavior. Recommend maintaining conditional licensure status and imposing a fine of $2,500.
02-003849  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs GENESIS ELDERCARE NATIONAL CENTERS, INC., D/B/A OAKWOOD CENTER  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2002
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Agency did not meet burden of proving that skilled nursing facility failed to have due diligence taken to prevent, subsequently detect if the condition could not be prevented, and provide appropriate care and treatment for alleged condition of resident.
02-003850  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs GENESIS ELDERCARE NATIONAL CENTERS, INC., D/B/A OAKWOOD CENTER  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2002
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Agency did not meet burden of proving that skilled nursing facility failed to have due diligence taken to prevent, subsequently detect if the condition could not be prevented, and provide appropriate care and treatment for alleged condition of resident.
02-003254  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs AVANTE AT LEESBURG, INC., D/B/A AVANTE AT LEESBURG  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2002
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Agency did not meet its burden of proof in that it did not prove that a Class III deficiency was not corrected within the time frame established by the agency. Recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.
02-003255  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs AVANTE AT LEESBURG, INC., D/B/A AVANTE AT LEESBURG  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2002
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Agency did not meet its burden of proof in that it did not prove that a Class III deficiency was not corrected within the time frame established by the agency. Recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.
02-002512  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs NORTHPOINTE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC., D/B/A NORTHPOINTE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2002
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner did not meet its burden of proof to justify imposition of administrative fines. Recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer