Leon FL Lawyers | Jonathan Anthony Martin -- eLawyers

Jonathan Anthony Martin

Visitors: 77

Bar #117535(FL) License for 10 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Jonathan Anthony Martin? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 114.02, 120.52, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 402.70, 440.01, 440.02, 440.10, 440.107, 440.12, 440.38, 658.53, 90.303, 90.304

Florida Administrative Code: 69L-6.015, 69L-6.028

15-3160 William David Webb v. State of Florida (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 13, 2017

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA WILLIAM DAVID WEBB, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-3160 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 14, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge. Andy Thomas, Public Defender, William Pafford, Assistant Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, ..

18-001300 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs JOHN MCCARY GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC. (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 2018

Did Respondent, John McCary General Contractor, Inc. (McCary), fail to secure workers’ compensation insurance for employees as required by chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2016)?1/ If so, what is the appropriate penalty?DFS proved contractor owed penalty of $269,317.06 for uncovered employees, uncovered subcontractors, and undocumented cash expenditures.

17-005900 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs A.S.A.P. FLOORING, INC. (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 2017

Whether Respondent violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2016),1/ by failing to secure the payment of workers’ compensation coverage, as alleged in the Third Amended Order of Penalty Assessment; and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent failed to secure workers' compensation insurance for its employee during the audit period, and Petitioner correctly calculated the penalty to be imposed.

18-001804 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs HORACE BRADLEY SHEFFIELD BUILDERS, LLC (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 06, 2018

The issue is whether Horace Bradley Sheffield Builders, LLC (“Sheffield Builders”), had insufficient workers’ compensation insurance during the time period in question; and, if so, the amount of the resulting penalty.Petitioner failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that a payroll recipient was not working under the auspices of a subcontractor with workers' compensation coverage.

15-007356 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs SOLER AND SON ROOFING (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 30, 2015

The issues are whether, under section 440.107, Florida Statutes, Petitioner may calculate a penalty assessment for a failure to secure the payment of workers' compensation for one day as though the failure persisted over two years and whether Petitioner may calculate a penalty assessment based on double the statewide average weekly wage (AWW) when the lone uncovered employee earned $10 per hour.For calculation of penalty assessment, DFS proved that one employee earning $10/hr was uncovered for one day for penalty of $1000 statutory minimum. DFS's interpretation of rule extending period of noncompliance 2 yrs rendered rule invalid in this case.

15-005379 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs M AND M MAINTENANCE OF TAMPA BAY, INC. (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 2015

The issue is whether the Stop-Work Order and 2nd Amended Order of Penalty Assessment issued by Petitioner, Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation (Department), on July 1, 2015, and February 29, 2016, respectively, should be upheld.Department established by clear and convincing evidence that 2nd amended penalty assessment was correct.