Leon FL and Government Lawyers | Kyle Christopher -- eLawyers

Kyle Christopher

Visitors: 49

(850

) 617-8893

Bar #40853(FL) License for 17 years; Member in Good Standing

Tallahassee FL

Are you Kyle Christopher? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 18 U.S.C 1341, 18 U.S.C 371

Florida Laws: 1.01, 119.071, 120.569, 120.57, 120.574, 120.68, 17.001, 17.002, 20.165, 219.06, 440.02, 440.05, 440.10, 440.107, 440.12, 440.13, 440.192, 440.20, 440.38, 455.227, 455.2273, 456.072, 456.073, 458.331, 475.25, 486.125, 489.105, 489.111, 489.113, 489.115, 489.119, 489.1195, 489.126, 489.127, 489.129, 489.13, 489.1425, 548.003, 548.006, 548.0065, 548.007, 548.008, 548.041, 548.071, 553.62, 57.105, 57.111, 570.11, 627.8405, 812.014, 838.014, 838.016, 90.301, 90.803, 90.805

Florida Administrative Code: 60Q-6.105, 61G4-17.001, 61G4-17.002

09-000121 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs FRED BOWYER, D/B/A PROTEAM AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 2009

Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent’s licenses to practice contracting, license numbers CGC057941, CGC1509240 and QB37866, based on alleged violations of Section 489.1425, and Subsections 489.129(1)(g)1., 489.129(1)(g)2., 489.129(1)(g)3., 489.129(1)(j), 489.129(1)(m), and 489.129(1)(o), Florida Statutes (2007),1 as charged in the Administrative Complaint filed against Respondent in this proceeding.Petitioner proved that Respondent was the primary qualifying agent for ProTeam. Respondent abandoned one project and failed to properly supervise a second project. Recommend 4 years probation, administrative fine, costs and restitution.

09-000174 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs PAGE WURTS, D/B/A PAGE HOME BUILDERS, INC. (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2009

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsections 489.129(1)(n) and 489.129(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2005),1 and if so, what discipline should be imposed.Contractor failed to properly supervise resulting in the collapse of homeowner`s ceiling.

09-001574 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs JEFFREY LUIS CARRASCO, D/B/A JCSI CERTIFIED ROOFING CONTRACTORS (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2009

The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the charged provisions of Section 489.129, Florida Statutes (2006), and if so, what penalty should be imposed for his conduct?Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Section 489.129(i)(g)2., (i) and (m), Florida Statutes. All other charges should be dismissed.

10-007400PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs JAIME QUILES (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 10, 2010

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him.Department failed to clearly and convincingly prove that contractor abandoned project; counts of complaint alleging violations of Section 489.129(1)(g)2 and (j) thus must be dismissed. Remaining count, alleging violation of Section 489.1425, was proven.

10-009213PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs CHANDRA BETH CURBELO (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 2010

Whether Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes (2005),1 by abandoning a construction project, and, if so, the appropriate discipline; and Whether Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(i) by virtue of her violation of section 489.127(1)(f), which prohibits engaging in the business or acting in the capacity of a contractor without being licensed, and, if so, the appropriate discipline.Respondent was found guilty of violating section 489.129(1)(j) by abandoning a construction job and section 489.127(1(f) by acting as a contractor without a license.

11-000244PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs JACK V. ORGANO (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2011

The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 489.129(1)(i), 489.129(1)(o), and 489.1425, Florida Statutes (2007 & 2009),1/ and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Contractor failed to put language in contracts with two customers advising them of their rights under the Florida Homeowners' Construction Recovery Fund and commenced work on two projects without obtaining the necessary building permits.

11-000245PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs JACK V. ORGANO (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2011

11-004156PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs ANDRES R. VILLARREAL (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2011

The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Guilty plea to accepting unlawful compensation relates to the ability to practice contracting, in violation of s.489.129(1)(b); recommend 1 -year suspension, probation and fine. Failure to report guilty plea to licensing board warrants reprimand and fine.

08-004836 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs FREDERICK B. NOWELL, SR., D/B/A WELLING CONSTRUCTION, INC./REDLAND COMPANY, INC. (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2008

The issue to be determined is whether Respondent has committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Sections 489.129(1)(b) and 455.227(1)(c), Florida Statutes, when he pled guilty to mail fraud in federal district court. Recommend revocation, a $15,000 fine and costs.

18-005347 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs DAVE'S TRACTOR, LLC (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2018

The issue is whether the Amended Order of Penalty Assessment issued to Respondent, Dave's Tractor, LLC, on August 27, 2018, is correct.Employer failed to timely file business records after penalty assessment issued. Agency properly imputed payroll during review period.