Alachua FL Lawyers | Patrice Flinchbaugh Boyes -- eLawyers

17-005999GM WHS VISIONS OF LAKELAND, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND BS RANCH AND FARM, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION vs POLK COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 2017

Whether Polk County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 17D-08/DMS 59550, adopted by Ordinance 2017-049 on October 3, 2017 (the Plan Amendment), is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017).1/Petitioners proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the Plan Amendment is not in compliance.

02-002676GM DAVID AND DECEMBER MCSHERRY; DWIGHT ADAMS; AND SUSTAINABLE ALACHUA COUNTY, INC. vs ALACHUA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2002

The issue in these cases is whether the Alachua County Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted through Alachua County Ordinance Number 03-05 on August 26, 2003, are "in compliance," as defined in Subsection 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2003).Petitioner failed to prove beyond "fair debate" that the 2003 Amendments to Alachua County`s Plan were not "in compliance" with the relevant statutory and rule requirements.

03-000955 SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT vs FLORIDA CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS, INC. (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 2003

The issue is whether Respondent's water use permit should be revoked for nonuse of the permit for a period of two years or more.Respondent`s failure to use its water use permit for two years was excusable due to drought conditions and federal regulations, which prevented it from using spring water for bottling purposes.

99-003096 FLORIDA CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND SAVE OUR SUWANNEE, INC. vs SUWANNEE AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 1999

The issue is whether the Petition for Administrative Hearing should be dismissed for failure to state a cause cognizable under Florida Law.Rules related to water quality criteria and Outstanding Florida Water standards do not apply to an application for an air construction permit.

95-000752 CITY OF NEWBERRY vs WATSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 1995

Is Respondent, Watson Construction Company, Inc. (Watson), entitled to a general permit allowing it to operate a construction and demolition debris facility in Newberry, Alachua County, Florida?Insufficient information provided to justify granting a general permit to operate a construction and demolition debris disposal facility.

92-005017 LAKE BROOKLYN CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. vs FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 1992

The issue is whether Florida Rock Industries' application for renewal of its consumptive use permit to pump water at its Goldhead Sand Mine in Clay County, Florida, should be granted.Mining operations not responsible for declining levels of water in nearby lakes. Permit issued.

95-000749GM HISTORIC GAINESVILLE, INC.; DUCKPOND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC.; MARK BARROW; AND JANE MYERS vs CITY OF GAINESVILLE, JOHN AND DENISE FEIBER, KATHERINE BODINE AND DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 1995

The issue in this case is whether the City of Gainesville comprehensive plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 4036 on October 24, 1994, is in compliance.Plan amendment found not to be in compliance. On remand, evidence not reweighed since proper burden of proof used in initial Recommended Order.

20-001562GM WEST SHORE LEGACY LLC vs ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA (2020)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2020

Whether the Alachua County Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 20-05 on February 5, 2020 (the “Plan Amendment”), is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2019).1Petitioner did not prove that Respondent's Plan Amendment is not "in compliance."

Patrice Flinchbaugh Boyes