Okaloosa FL Employment and labor, Estate planning and Litiga -- eLawyers

Stefan Thomas Peavey Hoffer

Visitors: 33

(850

) 502-3601

Bar #935921(FL) License for 20 years; Member in Good Standing

Destin FL

Are you Stefan Thomas Peavey Hoffer? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 10.001, 119.07, 120.569, 120.57, 120.69, 20.165, 550.002, 550.0251, 550.105, 550.2415, 559.791, 90.803

Florida Administrative Code: 61D-10.001, 61D-5.006, 61D-6.005

05-000601PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs KIMBERLY A. HUDSON (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 2005

The issue for determination is whether Petitioner should discipline Respondent's pari-mutuel wagering occupational license for allegedly preventing authorized personnel from taking a urine sample from a greyhound after a race in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-6.005(9).Petitioner should impose a $1,000 fine on Respondent who effectively interferred with the collection of urine samples from a winning greyhound by insisting on the presence of two dogs in the detention area.

06-000736PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JOSE PARADELO (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 2006

Whether Petitioner committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what discipline should be imposed against Respondent's Pari-Mutuel Wagering Occupational License?The evidence did not clearly establish that Respondent falsified his application. The other allegation was not sufficiently pled. Recommend that the Administrative Complaint be dismissed.

06-000164RP WASHINGTON COUNTY KENNEL CLUB, INC.; HARTMAN-TYNER, INC.; SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ENTERPRISES, INC.; AND ST. PETERSBURG KENNEL CLUB, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2006

Whether the proposed repeal of Rule 61D-11.027, Florida Administrative Code, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority because the repeal has the effect of creating or implementing a new rule or policy.Repeal of the rule was not an invalid exercise as the agency articulated valid reasons for its repeal.

06-003040PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs CHAD E. MICHAUD (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 18, 2006

The issue in this case is whether Respondent's license should be summarily suspended in accordance with Subsection 550.2415(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2006).The summary suspension of Respondent`s license is upheld due to the presence of a prohibited subtance in the dog`s system.

06-000737PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs THOMAS M. DUDLEY (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 2006

Should Petitioner impose discipline against Respondent's Pari-Mutuel Wagering Occupational License, and other relief for alleged violation of Section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2005)?Respondent was the trainer for greyhounds that raced under the influence of drugs.

05-004358PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs SRDAN SARIC (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 30, 2005

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Srdan Saric, committed violations of Chapter 550, Florida Statutes (2005), and Florida Administrative Code Chapter 61D-6, as alleged in an Administrative Complaint filed with the Department of Business and Professional Regulation in DBPR Case Nos. 2005042972, 2005039423, and 2005042974, and amended January 30, 2006; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against his State of Florida pari-mutuel wagering occupational license.Respondent was found to have two syringes in his tack box. Two horses tested positive for Flunixin, a Class IV drug, and phenylbutazone in excessive amounts.

05-003208 JOSEPH L. NACCA vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 02, 2005

The issues are: (1) whether Petitioner is qualified for a pari-mutuel wagering occupational license; and (2) whether Petitioner is entitled to waiver of his felony conviction in accordance with Chapter 550, Florida Statutes (2006).Petitioner`s felony conviction warrants denial of a pari-mutuel occupational license, where Petitioner failed to establish rehabilitation or present good moral character.

05-002408 STEPHEN M. MORRIS vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2005

The issues are: (1) whether Petitioner is qualified for a pari-mutuel wagering occupational license as a greyhound owner; and, (2) whether Petitioner is entitled to waiver of the provisions in accordance to Chapter 550, Florida Statutes (2004).Respondent properly denied Petitioner`s application for a pari-mutuel wagering license based on his three felony convictions and his failure to establish rehabilitation and demonstrate present good moral character.

04-003039PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JERRY M. BONETT (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 27, 2004

The issues in the case are whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent failed to completely disclose felony convictions on an application filed with Petitioner.

04-003638PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JENNETTE D. HOLMES (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2004

Whether Respondent violated Subsection 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.The Greyhound tested positive for a metabolite of Cocaine. The trainer is statutorily responsible for the condition of the dog.