Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | Theodore R Gay -- eLawyers

Theodore R Gay

Visitors: 129

305-551-0529

Bar #242896(FL) License for 48 years

Miami FL

Are you Theodore R Gay? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Administrative Code: 61G4-17.001

10-009213PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs CHANDRA BETH CURBELO (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 2010

Whether Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes (2005),1 by abandoning a construction project, and, if so, the appropriate discipline; and Whether Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(i) by virtue of her violation of section 489.127(1)(f), which prohibits engaging in the business or acting in the capacity of a contractor without being licensed, and, if so, the appropriate discipline.Respondent was found guilty of violating section 489.129(1)(j) by abandoning a construction job and section 489.127(1(f) by acting as a contractor without a license.

10-009317PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs BRIAN VINCENT BURNS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2010

In this disciplinary proceeding, the issues are: (1) Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint issued by the Petitioner; and (2) Whether disciplinary penalties should be imposed on Respondent if Petitioner proves one or more of the violations charged in its Administrative Complaint.Respondent violated Chapter 489 by abandoning a construction project when he failed to complete the work under contract and he did not include a written statement explaining the consumer's rights under the Florida Homeowners' Construction Recovery Fund.

1D07-6171 Sneed v. McNeil (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 2008 Citations: 984 So. 2d 1253

984 So. 2d 1253 (2008) SNEED v. McNEIL. No. 1D07-6171. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 23, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Cert.denied.

1D10-2337 Cargile v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2010 Citations: 41 So. 3d 892

41 So. 3d 892 (2010) CARGILE v. STATE. No. 1D10-2337. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 5, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

05-002798PL JOHN L. WINN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs CYNTHIA B. FOY (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 03, 2005

The issues are whether Respondent, Cynthia A. Foy (Respondent), committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint; whether the alleged conduct constitutes violations of Subsection 1012.795(1)(b), (c), (f), and (i), Florida Statutes (2003),1/ and Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-1.006(3)(a) and (e) and (5)(d); and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be imposed on Respondent's teaching certificate.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent was guilty of gross immorality or act involving moral turpitude, incompetence, personal conduct which seriously reduced her effectiveness as a teacher, or of violating the Principles of Professional Conduct.

07-003592PL JOHN L. WINN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs VIRGINIA BRYAN MARTIN (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2007

Whether Respondent, Virginia Bryan Martin, is guilty of the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated April 16, 2007, and, if so, should her Florida Professional Educator's Certificate be disciplined.Respondent had two DUIs. One was reduced to reckless driving; Respondent was found guilty of the other count. Although the violations were not found to be gross immorality, Respondent`s Educator`s Certificate should be disciplined.

06-003659 RICHARD BRANDENBERGER vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2006

The issue in the case is as set forth in the Notice of Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits dated November 10, 2005, and issued by the Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement (Respondent), to Richard Brandenberger (Petitioner).Petitioner`s conviction for smuggling drugs to prisoners warrants forfeiture of his Florida Retirement System benefits.

06-003532 DAVID W. DEY vs CITY OF KISSIMMEE (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 19, 2006

The issue for determination is whether Respondent discriminated against Petitioner on the basis of a handicap, in violation of Section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2003).Diabetes is not a per se disability, and the preponderance of the evidence did not show that diabetes substantially impaired major life activity.

05-001499PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs VIC GEORGE (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2005

In this disciplinary proceeding, the issues are whether Respondent, a licensed contractor, failed timely to renew the certificate of authority issued to his qualified business entity; failed to include, in a construction contract, the required notice regarding consumer rights under the recovery fund; abandoned a construction project; or committed any of these offenses, as alleged by Petitioner in its Administrative Complaint. If Petitioner proves one or more of the alleged violations, then an additional question will arise, namely whether penalties should be imposed on Respondent.Respondent is guilty of failing to include the notice of consumer rights under the recovery fund, but is not guilty of failing to timely renew the certificate of authority or of abandoning the construction contract. Recommend a $1,000 fine plus costs.

05-001686PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs BRET JAYSON BOREK (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 12, 2005

The issue for determination is whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what action should be taken.Respondent failed to have a current certificate of authority; failed to include the consumer`s rights provision in the contract; and committed misconduct, but did not abandon the project. Recommend administrative fine of $6,500 and revocation of license.