welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Thomas Ira Mayton, Jr.
Thomas Ira Mayton, Jr.
Thomas Ira Mayton, Jr.
Visitors: 73
0
Bar #905909(FL)     License for 34 years; Member in Good Standing
Palatka FL

Are you Thomas Ira Mayton, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-002543RE  ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, FLORIDA DEFENDERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT, SILVER SPRINGS ALLIANCE, AND ALICE GARDINER vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 28, 2017
The issue to be determined is whether St. Johns River Water Management District Emergency Rule 40CER17-01 constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.The Emergency Rule establishing minimum flows and levels for Silver Springs is not arbitrary or capricious or otherwise an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
14-002608  SIERRA CLUB, INC., AND ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, INC. vs SLEEPY CREEK LANDS, LLC AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Consumptive Use Permit No. 2-083-91926-3, and Environmental Resource Permit No. IND-083-130588-4 should be issued as proposed in the respective proposed agency actions issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District.Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving the case in opposition to the issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit and Environmental Resource Permit for irrigation in support of a grass-fed cattle ranch. Thus, the permits should be issued.
14-002609  KAREN AHLERS AND JERI BALDWIN vs SLEEPY CREEK LANDS, LLC AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Consumptive Use Permit No. 2-083-91926-3, and Environmental Resource Permit No. IND-083-130588-4 should be issued as proposed in the respective proposed agency actions issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District.Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving the case in opposition to the issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit and Environmental Resource Permit for irrigation in support of a grass-fed cattle ranch. Thus, the permits should be issued.
14-002610  KAREN AHLERS AND JERI BALDWIN vs SLEEPY CREEK LANDS, LLC AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Consumptive Use Permit No. 2-083-91926-3, and Environmental Resource Permit No. IND-083-130588-4 should be issued as proposed in the respective proposed agency actions issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District.Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving the case in opposition to the issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit and Environmental Resource Permit for irrigation in support of a grass-fed cattle ranch. Thus, the permits should be issued.
05-000344  MIAMI CORPORATION AND VERGIE CLARK vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 18, 2007
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
05-002607  VERGIE CLARK vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 20, 2005
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
05-002940  MIAMI CORPORATION vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2005
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
04-000880RP  ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2004
The issue for determination in this case is whether proposed rules 62-40.410(3) and 62-40.474, in whole or in part, are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority within the meaning of Section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2005).1The proposed rules are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.
00-002230  BOBBY C. BILLIE AND SHANNON LARSEN vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND HINES INTERESTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 26, 2000
The issues to be resolved in this proceedings concern whether Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 4-109-0216-ERP, should be modified to allow construction and operation of a surface water management system (project) related to the construction and operation of single-family homes on "Marshall Creek" (Parcel D) in a manner consistent with the standards for issuance of an ERP in accordance with Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Florida Administrative Code.Applicant Respondent showed reasonable assurance that all stormwater and water quality parameters would be met, especially in view of wetland mitigation and preservation plan.
00-002231  THE SIERRA CLUB vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND HINES INTERESTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 26, 2000
The issues to be resolved in this proceedings concern whether Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 4-109-0216-ERP, should be modified to allow construction and operation of a surface water management system (project) related to the construction and operation of single-family homes on "Marshall Creek" (Parcel D) in a manner consistent with the standards for issuance of an ERP in accordance with Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Florida Administrative Code.Applicant Respondent showed reasonable assurance that all stormwater and water quality parameters would be met, especially in view of wetland mitigation and preservation plan.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer