Leon FL Administrative law, Government and Licensing Lawyers -- eLawyers

David Kenneth Minacci

Visitors: 64

850-402-1570

Bar #56774(FL) License for 29 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you David Kenneth Minacci? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-000532 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs MONROE LEE (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 14, 2003

Whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent engaged in the unlicensed practice of architecture. Recommended imposition of administrative penalty.

03-001643 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs HELMUTH GEISER (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 07, 2003

Whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent violated relevant statute by holding himself out as an architect and offering to provide architectural services without a Florida license. Evidence insufficient to demonstrate that Respondent performed "architectural services."

14-004747 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN vs CHARLES JACKSON AND CHARLES JACKSON ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 2014

Whether Charles Jackson and/or Charles Jackson Architectural Designs (Respondents) committed the offenses alleged in the subject Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Individual respondent should be fined for practicing architecture without a license and order to cease and desist doing business as Charles Jackson Architectural Designs should be upheld.

12-001516 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN vs DIAZ AND RUSSELL CORPORATION AND NELSON R. DIAZ (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 23, 2012

The issue for determination is whether Respondents committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint, filed on February 14, 2012, and, if so, what action should be taken.Petitioner demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that Respondents committed the offenses in the two-count administrative complaint. Recommend administrative fine of $5,000 per count, totaling $10,000.

08-001827F SHERYL LYN BRAXTON AND BRAXTON DESIGNERS vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 14, 2008

Whether Petitioners are entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 57.111, Florida Statutes.Actions taken by probable cause panel were not substantially justified. Fees are awarded to Petitioner pursuant to to Florida Equal Access to Justice Act.

05-000552 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs W. R. "BUDDY" BRAREN, III (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 15, 2005

The primary issues for determination are whether W.R. “Buddy” Braren, III, (Respondent) engaged in the unlicensed practice of architecture contrary to the proscription contained in Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes; and secondarily, if Respondent committed such a violation, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner failed to provide clear and convincing evidence that Respondent did not meet the requirements for exemption as set forth in Section 481.229(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Recommend that the complaint be dismissed.

03-004605 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs JIMMY LEE WALLACE AND ONYX DESIGN INC. (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 09, 2003

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Respondents committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint, which involve the Respondents allegedly practicing architecture or providing architectural services without being duly-registered or certified; using the title "architect" or words to that effect when not holding a valid license and Jimmy Lee Wallace presenting another's architecture license as one's own.Petitioner established that Respondent was "holding out" to provide architectural services, drawing plans, disseminating business cards showing he was an architect (wit another`s license number) when he was unlicensed. Some projects exceeded $25,000.

03-000489 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN vs LEE MABIRE AND LEE MABIRE COMPANY (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2003

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondents practiced architecture without being appropriately licensed, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what, if any, penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved that Respondent planned the preparation for a building that was private, but included accessibility to the public. The $25,000 building value exemption did not apply and Respondent was unlicensed in architecture. Recommend fine.

01-000273PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS vs FRANK V. BURIANEK (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 19, 2001

The issues in this case are: (1) whether Respondent used a title that tended to indicate he was an active registered engineer in the State of Florida when he did not hold such registration; (2) whether Respondent violated an order previously issued by the Department; (3) and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent`s use of title Civil and Structural Engineer on business card and letterhead, when followed by listing of educational credentials, is not misleading advertisement; does not indicate he holds active registration as engineer in Florida.

00-003234PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY vs JOHN C. MESE (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 04, 2000

The issues are whether Respondent has been found guilty of crimes directly relating to the practice of public accounting, in violation of Section 473.323(1)(d), Florida Statutes; has performed a fraudulent act while licensed to practice public accounting, in violation of Section 473.323(1)(k), Florida Statutes; has failed to maintain good moral character, in violation of Section 473.323(l)(m), Florida Statutes; all as charged in the Administrative Complaint dated May 23, 2000, and if so what penalty should be imposed.Accountant`s conviction of attempted murder, money laundering, and forgery warrants license revocation.