Any general litigator could handle your case, but unfortunately it would be very hard to litigate a collection of this debt cost effectively due to it's small amount. In California you could retain a lawyer who assists pro se litigants under a "limited scope" representation. I sometimes do that in an appropriate case and other lawyers do as well. That way you do most of the work, but have a qualified attorney coaching you and watching out for mistakes. They may also agree to make limited court appearances if appropriate. I am not sure, however, if limited scope representations are allowed under Texas laws governing the practice of law there.
Which brings us to your other question: TX or CA. The answer to that depends on whether a credible case can be made that your loan agreement was entered into in CA. The basic rule is you must sue a defendant where they are, but there are exceptions to that rule, one of them being if the contract was entered into in another state, or was to be performed in another state, in which case either state would have jurisdiction. You would need to go over the facts and documentation of the transaction with a CA lawyer to get an opinion on whether you could have the case heard here.
Any general litigator could handle your case, but unfortunately it would be very hard to litigate a collection of this debt cost effectively due to it's small amount. In California you could retain a lawyer who assists pro se litigants under a "limited scope" representation. I sometimes do that in an appropriate case and other lawyers do as well. That way you do most of the work, but have a qualified attorney coaching you and watching out for mistakes. They may also agree to make limited court appearances if appropriate. I am not sure, however, if limited scope representations are allowed under Texas laws governing the practice of law there.
Which brings us to your other question: TX or CA. The answer to that depends on whether a credible case can be made that your loan agreement was entered into in CA. The basic rule is you must sue a defendant where they are, but there are exceptions to that rule, one of them being if the contract was entered into in another state, or was to be performed in another state, in which case either state would have jurisdiction. You would need to go over the facts and documentation of the transaction with a CA lawyer to get an opinion on whether you could have the case heard here.